Patent and Trademark Disputes. Notwithstanding Section 16.2, any dispute, controversy or claim relating to the inventorship, scope, validity, enforceability or infringement of any Patents or Marks Covering the manufacture, use, importation, offer for sale or sale of Products shall be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction in the country in which such patent or trademark rights were granted or arose.
Patent and Trademark Disputes. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, any and all issues regarding the scope, construction, validity, and enforceability of any Patent or trademark relating to a Product that is the subject of this Agreement shall be determined in a court or other tribunal, as the case may be, of competent jurisdiction under the applicable patent or trademark laws of the country in which such Patent or trademark rights were granted or arose.
Patent and Trademark Disputes. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Article 12, any dispute, controversy or claim relating to the scope, validity, enforceability or infringement of any Licensed Patents shall be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction in the country in which such Patent was filed or granted.
Patent and Trademark Disputes. Notwithstanding Section 13.1, any dispute, controversy or claim relating to the scope, validity, enforceability or infringement of any Patent or trademark rights outside the U.S. covering the manufacture, use, importation, offer for sale or sale of the Product shall be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction in the country in which such Patent or trademark rights were granted or arose. [ * ] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Patent and Trademark Disputes. Notwithstanding Section 15.2, any Dispute between the Parties or their respective Affiliates relating to the scope, validity, enforceability or infringement of any Patents or Trademarks covering the manufacture, use, importation, offer for sale or sale of Galapagos Molecules, Galapagos Products, Optioned Molecules or Optioned Products shall be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction in the country in which such patent or trademark rights were granted or arose.
Patent and Trademark Disputes. Notwithstanding Section 14.2, any dispute, controversy or claim relating to the scope, validity, enforceability or infringement of any Galapagos Patents, Gilead Patents, Gilead Combination Patents, Joint Patents or Marks covering the manufacture, use, importation, offer for sale or sale of Licensed Products or Gilead Combination Products shall be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction in the country in which such patent or trademark rights were granted or arose.
Patent and Trademark Disputes. Notwithstanding Section 11.2, any dispute, controversy or claim between the Parties relating to the scope, validity, enforceability or infringement of any Principia Patent, Joint Patent, Sanofi Patent or Marks, in each case, covering the manufacture, use, importation, offer for sale or sale of Products will be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction in the country in which such patent or trademark rights were granted or arose.
Patent and Trademark Disputes. Notwithstanding Section 17.1, any dispute, controversy or claim relating to the scope, validity, enforceability or infringement of any Unum Background Patents, Unum Program IP, SGI Background Patents, SGI Program IP or Marks covering the manufacture, use, importation, offer for sale or sale of Products will be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction in the country in which such patent or trademark rights were granted or arose.
Patent and Trademark Disputes. Notwithstanding Section 16.3 (Arbitration), any Dispute regarding the scope, construction, validity, enforceability, or infringement of any Patent Rights, trademark rights, or trade dress rights applicable to the Licensed Products will be determined in a court or other tribunal, as the case may be, of competent jurisdiction under the Applicable Laws of the United States or Japan in which such Patent Rights, trademark rights, or trade dress rights were granted or arose. 16.5
Patent and Trademark Disputes. Notwithstanding Section 14.5.2, and without prejudice to CytomX’s rights pursuant to Section 13.2.4 or Astellas’s rights pursuant to Section 13.3.4(b), any dispute, controversy or claim relating to the inventorship, scope, validity, enforceability or infringement of any Patents Covering, or the scope, validity, enforceability or infringement of any trademark used in connection with, the manufacture, use, importation, offer for sale or sale of Products shall be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction in the country in which such patent or trademark rights were granted or arose.
