Common use of Performance Review Process Clause in Contracts

Performance Review Process. The University shall be responsible for the performance review process and shall ensure fair and reasonable treatment of any faculty members being reviewed. Student course evaluation forms shall be completed for each assigned credit course prior to the end of each academic semester, unless otherwise agreed between the University and the Faculty Association. At the conclusion of each semester, the University shall produce a summary of all numerical ratings along with a record of all written comments from every student course evaluation form. This documentation shall be sent to the faculty member as soon as practicable after the end of the semester, with a copy to the Vice-President Academic and a copy placed in each faculty member’s personnel file. All faculty members shall be notified when their summaries of course evaluations (for Teaching Faculty) or written administrative assessments (for Non-Teaching Faculty) are available for examination and shall be required annually to examine their own summary or assessment and to advise Human Resources, by written record, confirming that they have done so. For each Non-Teaching faculty member, an administrative assessment shall be completed annually by the Non-Teaching faculty member’s direct administrative supervisor and placed in the faculty member’s personnel file. The Developmental Review Committee shall review Probationary faculty members annually. Regular faculty members may be reviewed by the Developmental Review Committee annually, and no less than once within a three year period. The Xxxx, an Assistant Xxxx of the Faculty or equivalent and one faculty elected by the Regular faculty from the Faculty shall review Non-Regular faculty members annually within their program areas. Recommendations of this committee, regarding the eligibility for renewal of Non-Regular appointments, shall be provided to the faculty member, prior to being forwarded to the Sessional Hiring Committees. Where the performance review is deemed unsatisfactory and/or where the recommendation is not to re-hire, the non-regular faculty member shall be notified by the Xxxx and provided an opportunity to discuss the review/recommendation.

Performance Review Process. The University shall be responsible for the performance review process and shall ensure fair and reasonable treatment of any faculty members being reviewed. Student course evaluation forms shall be completed for each assigned credit course prior to the end of each academic semester, unless otherwise agreed between the University and the Faculty Association. At the conclusion of each semester, the University shall produce a summary of all numerical ratings along with a record of all written comments from every student course evaluation form. This documentation shall be sent to the faculty member as soon as practicable after the end of the semester, with a copy to the Vice-President Academic and a copy placed in each faculty member’s personnel file. All faculty members shall be notified when their summaries of course evaluations (for Teaching Faculty) or written administrative assessments (for Non-Teaching Faculty) are available for examination and shall be required annually to examine their own summary or assessment and to advise Human Resources, by written record, confirming that they have done so. For each Non-Teaching faculty member, an administrative assessment shall be completed annually by the Non-Teaching faculty member’s direct administrative supervisor and placed in the faculty member’s personnel file. The Developmental Review Committee shall review Probationary faculty members annually. Regular faculty members may be reviewed by the Developmental Review Committee annually, and no less than once within a three year period. The Xxxx, an Assistant Xxxx of the Faculty or equivalent and one faculty elected by the Regular faculty from the Faculty shall review Non-Regular faculty members annually within their program areas. Recommendations of this committee, regarding the eligibility for renewal of Non-Regular appointments, shall be provided to the faculty member, prior to being forwarded to the Sessional Hiring Committees. Where the performance review is deemed unsatisfactory and/or where the recommendation is not to re-hire, the non-regular faculty member shall be notified by the Xxxx and provided an opportunity to discuss the review/recommendation.