Periodic Reviews. 1. The College will conduct periodic reviews of faculty members according to the following schedule: Status Maximum Time Until Periodic Review Probationary Full-Time Teaching Faculty Annual Probationary Full-Time Academic Professional Annual Probationary Part-Time Teaching Faculty Within first 24 workload hours and each 40 workload hours thereafter Probationary Part-Time Academic Professional Within first 1,000 clock hours and each 1,000 clock hours thereafter Continuing Contract Full-Time Teaching Faculty Every 6th academic year after achieving Continuing Contract status Continuing Contract Full-Time Academic Professional Every 6th academic year after achieving Continuing Contract status Associate Continuing Contract Part-Time Teaching Faculty Every 6th academic year after achieving Associate Continuing Contract status Associate Continuing Contract Part-Time Academic Professional Every 6th academic year after achieving Associate Continuing Contract status The College will establish a rotating schedule for periodic performance reviews of post-probationary bargaining unit members. Members scheduled for a periodic review will be so advised no later than August 30 of the academic year for which the review is scheduled. If a periodic review cannot be completed (e.g., because the member is on leave of absence or layoff, etc.), it will be rescheduled for the following academic year. 2. Periodic reviews will address professional development activities and plans, performance of professional responsibilities (as summarized in Article VIII.), adherence to professional standards and codes of ethics if applicable, relationships with peers and students, and other work-related criteria. At a minimum, periodic performance reviews will be based on the following components if they are available. a. Administrator Performance Assessment Each faculty member’s performance will be periodically reviewed by the Supervising Administrator or designee. As part of the review, the Supervising Administrator or designee will observe the faculty member’s classroom/ workplace performance for a minimum of one hour on at least one day during the academic year for which the review is scheduled. A second observation will be conducted if requested by the administrator or the faculty member. The faculty member will be given at least seven days’ notice of each such observation period. b. Student/Client Feedback Written feedback about each faculty member’s performance will be obtained from students and other clients of faculty services at least annually and may be sought more often at the College’s discretion. Data or comments extracted from responses will be shared with the faculty member before they are used for purposes of periodic performance reviews. Student/client feedback data will not be used as the sole source of information for periodic performance reviews. c. Peer performance assessment Each faculty member’s performance will be periodically reviewed by one peer identified as follows: Classification Reviewing Peers Teaching Faculty Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible Lab Instructor Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible (including but not limited to the Faculty of Record in relevant courses) Lab Assistant Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible (including but not limited to the Faculty of Record in relevant courses) Professional Tutor Post-probationary Professional Tutors Librarian Post-probationary Librarians Licensed Professional Counselor Post-probationary Licensed Professional Counselors Academic Advisor Post-probationary Academic Advisors Teaching Clinician Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible Supplemental Instruction Leader Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible Sign Language Interpreters Post-probationary Sign Language Interpreters The reviewing peers will be selected from faculty who volunteer or are nominated by other members of the faculty member’s department. The faculty member being reviewed may request that an alternate be assigned for legitimate reason. Whenever possible, the reviewing peer will be selected from those who are appropriately trained to perform peer performance assessments. The reviewing peer will observe the faculty member’s classroom/workplace performance for a minimum of one hour on at least one day during the academic year for which the review is scheduled. A second observation will be conducted if requested by the reviewing peer or the faculty member. The faculty member will be given at least seven days’ notice of each such observation. After each observation, the reviewing peer will document the strengths and weaknesses of the faculty member’s performance, will describe any recommendations for improvement, and will meet with the faculty member to discuss the observations and recommendations. d. Self-Assessment As part of the periodic performance review, the faculty member being reviewed will write a self-assessment concerning the strengths and weaknesses of the faculty member’s performance and will describe any professional growth activities during the review period and any plans for future professional growth activities. The faculty member will submit the self-assessment, along with an updated curriculum vitae, to the responsible administrator at least one week prior to the meeting scheduled to discuss the comprehensive report.
Appears in 3 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Periodic Reviews.
1. The College will conduct periodic reviews of faculty members according to the following schedule: Status Maximum Time Until Periodic Review Probationary Full-Time Teaching Faculty Annual Probationary Full-Time Academic Professional Annual Probationary Part-Time Teaching Faculty Within first 24 workload hours and each 40 workload hours thereafter Probationary Part-Time Academic Professional Within first 1,000 clock hours and each 1,000 clock hours thereafter Continuing Contract Full-Time Teaching Faculty Every 6th academic year after achieving Continuing Contract status Continuing Contract Full-Time Academic Professional Every 6th academic year after achieving Continuing Contract status Associate Continuing Contract Part-Time Teaching Faculty Every 6th academic year after achieving Associate Continuing Contract status Associate Continuing Contract Part-Time Academic Professional Every 6th academic year after achieving Associate Continuing Contract status The College will establish a rotating schedule for periodic performance reviews of post-probationary bargaining unit members. Members scheduled for a periodic review will be so advised no later than August 30 of the academic year for which the review is scheduled. If a periodic review cannot be completed (e.g., because the member is on leave of absence or layoff, etc.), it will be rescheduled for the following academic year.
2. Periodic reviews will address professional development activities and plans, ; performance of professional responsibilities (as summarized in Article VIII.), ; adherence to professional standards and codes of ethics if applicable, ; relationships with peers and students, ; and other work-related criteria. At a minimum, periodic performance reviews will be based on the following components if they are available.
a. Administrator Performance Assessment Each faculty member’s performance will be periodically reviewed by the Supervising Administrator or designee. As part of the review, the Supervising Administrator or designee will observe the faculty member’s classroom/ workplace performance for a minimum of one hour on at least one day during the academic year for which the review is scheduled. A second observation will be conducted if requested by the administrator or the faculty member. The faculty member will be given at least seven days’ notice of each such observation period.
b. Student/Client Feedback Written feedback about each faculty member’s performance will be obtained from students and other clients of faculty services at least annually and may be sought more often at the College’s discretion. Data or comments extracted from responses will be shared with the faculty member before they are used for purposes of periodic performance reviews. Student/client feedback data will not be used as the sole source of information for periodic performance reviews.
c. Peer performance assessment Each faculty member’s performance will be periodically reviewed by one peer identified as follows: Classification Reviewing Peers Teaching Faculty Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible Lab Instructor Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible (including but not limited to the Faculty of Record in relevant courses) Lab Assistant Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible (including but not limited to the Faculty of Record in relevant courses) Professional Tutor Post-probationary Professional Tutors Librarian Post-probationary Librarians Licensed Professional Counselor Post-probationary Licensed Professional Counselors Academic Advisor Post-probationary Academic Advisors Teaching Clinician Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible Supplemental Instruction Leader Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible Sign Language Interpreters Post-probationary Sign Language Interpreters The reviewing peers will be selected from faculty who volunteer or are nominated by other members of the faculty member’s department. The faculty member being reviewed may request that an alternate be assigned for legitimate reason. Whenever possible, the reviewing peer will be selected from those who are appropriately trained to perform peer performance assessments. The reviewing peer will observe the faculty member’s classroom/workplace performance for a minimum of one hour on at least one day during the academic year for which the review is scheduled. A second observation will be conducted if requested by the reviewing peer or the faculty member. The faculty member will be given at least seven days’ notice of each such observation. After each observation, the reviewing peer will document the strengths and weaknesses of the faculty member’s performance, will describe any recommendations for improvement, and will meet with the faculty member to discuss the observations and recommendations.
d. Self-Assessment As part of the periodic performance review, the faculty member being reviewed will write a self-assessment concerning the strengths and weaknesses of the faculty member’s performance and will describe any professional growth activities during the review period and any plans for future professional growth activities. The faculty member will submit the self-assessment, along with an updated curriculum vitae, to the responsible administrator at least one week prior to the meeting scheduled to discuss the comprehensive report.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Periodic Reviews. 1. The College will conduct periodic reviews of faculty members according to the following schedule: Status Maximum Time Until Periodic Review Probationary Full-Time Teaching Faculty Annual Probationary Full-Time Academic Professional Annual Probationary Part-Time Teaching Faculty Within first 24 workload hours and each 40 workload hours thereafter Probationary Part-Time Academic Professional Within first 1,000 clock hours and each 1,000 clock hours thereafter Continuing Contract Full-Time Teaching Faculty Every 6th academic year after achieving Continuing Contract status Continuing Contract Full-Time Academic Professional Every 6th academic year after achieving Continuing Contract status Associate Continuing Contract Part-Time Teaching Faculty Every 6th academic year after achieving Associate Continuing Contract status Associate Continuing Contract Part-Time Academic Professional Every 6th academic year after achieving Associate Continuing Contract status The College will establish a rotating schedule for periodic performance reviews of post-probationary bargaining unit members. Members scheduled for a periodic review will be so advised no later than August 30 of the academic year for which the review is scheduled. If a periodic review cannot be completed (e.g., because the member is on leave of absence or layoff, etc.), it will be rescheduled for the following academic year.
2. Periodic reviews will address professional development activities and plans, ; performance of professional responsibilities (as summarized in Article VIII.), ; adherence to professional standards and codes of ethics if applicable, ; relationships with peers and students, ; and other work-related criteria. At a minimum, periodic performance reviews will be based on the following components if they are available.
a. Administrator Performance Assessment Each faculty member’s performance will be periodically reviewed by the Supervising Administrator or designee. As part of the review, the Supervising Administrator or designee will observe the faculty member’s classroom/ workplace performance for a minimum of one hour on at least one day during the academic year for which the review is scheduled. A second observation will be conducted if requested by the administrator or the faculty member. The faculty member will be given at least seven days’ notice of each such observation period.
b. Student/Client Feedback Written feedback about each faculty member’s performance will be obtained from students and other clients of faculty services at least annually and may be sought more often at the College’s discretion. Data or comments extracted from responses will be shared with the faculty member before they are used for purposes of periodic performance reviews. Student/client feedback data will not be used as the sole source of information for periodic performance reviews.
c. Peer performance assessment Each faculty member’s performance will be periodically reviewed by one peer identified as follows: Classification Reviewing Peers Teaching Faculty Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible Lab Instructor Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible (including but not limited to the Faculty of Record in relevant courses) Lab Assistant Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible (including but not limited to the Faculty of Record in relevant courses) Professional Tutor Post-probationary Professional Tutors Librarian Post-probationary Librarians Licensed Professional Counselor Post-probationary Licensed Professional Counselors Academic Advisor Post-probationary Academic Advisors Teaching Clinician Post-probationary Teaching Faculty faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible Supplemental Instruction Leader Post-probationary Teaching Faculty faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible Sign Language Interpreters Post-probationary Sign Language Interpreters The reviewing peers will be selected from faculty who volunteer or are nominated by other members of the faculty member’s department. The faculty member being reviewed may request that an alternate be assigned for legitimate reason. Whenever possible, the reviewing peer will be selected from those who are appropriately trained to perform peer performance assessments. The reviewing peer will observe the faculty member’s classroom/workplace performance for a minimum of one hour on at least one day during the academic year for which the review is scheduled. A second observation will be conducted if requested by the reviewing peer or the faculty member. The faculty member will be given at least seven days’ notice of each such observation. After each observation, the reviewing peer will document the strengths and weaknesses of the faculty member’s performance, will describe any recommendations for improvement, and will meet with the faculty member to discuss the observations and recommendations.
d. Self-Assessment As part of the periodic performance review, the faculty member being reviewed will write a self-assessment concerning the strengths and weaknesses of the faculty member’s performance and will describe any professional growth activities during the review period and any plans for future professional growth activities. The faculty member will submit the self-assessment, along with an updated curriculum vitae, to the responsible administrator at least one week prior to the meeting scheduled to discuss the comprehensive report.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Periodic Reviews.
1. The College will conduct periodic reviews of faculty members according to the following schedule: Status Maximum Time Until Periodic Review Probationary Full-Time Teaching Faculty Annual Probationary Full-Time Academic Professional Annual Probationary Part-Time Teaching Faculty Within first 24 workload hours and each 40 workload hours thereafter Probationary Part-Time Academic Professional Within first 1,000 clock hours and each 1,000 clock hours thereafter Continuing Contract Full-Time Teaching Faculty Every 6th academic year after achieving Continuing Contract status Continuing Contract Full-Time Academic Professional Every 6th academic year after achieving Continuing Contract status Associate Continuing Contract Part-Time Teaching Faculty Every 6th academic year after achieving Associate Continuing Contract status Associate Continuing Contract Part-Time Academic Professional Every 6th academic year after achieving Associate Continuing Contract status The College will establish a rotating schedule for periodic performance reviews of post-probationary bargaining unit members. Members scheduled for a periodic review will be so advised no later than August 30 of the academic year for which the review is scheduled. If a periodic review cannot be completed (e.g., because the member is on leave of absence or layoff, etc.), it will be rescheduled for the following academic year.
2. Periodic reviews will address professional development activities and plans, ; performance of professional responsibilities (as summarized in Article VIII.), ; adherence to professional standards and codes of ethics if applicable, ; relationships with peers and students, ; and other work-related criteria. At a minimum, periodic performance reviews will be based on the following components if they are available.
a. Administrator Performance Assessment Each faculty member’s performance will be periodically reviewed by the Supervising Administrator or designee. As part of the review, the Supervising Administrator or designee will observe the faculty member’s classroom/ workplace performance for a minimum of one hour on at least one day during the academic year for which the review is scheduled. A second observation will be conducted if requested by the administrator or the faculty member. The faculty member will be given at least seven days’ notice of each such observation period.
b. Student/Client Feedback Written feedback about each faculty member’s performance will be obtained from students and other clients of faculty services at least annually and may be sought more often at the College’s discretion. Data or comments extracted from responses will be shared with the faculty member before they are used for purposes of periodic performance reviews. Student/client feedback data will not be used as the sole source of information for periodic performance reviews.
c. Peer performance assessment Each faculty member’s performance will be periodically reviewed by one peer identified as follows: Classification Reviewing Peers Teaching Faculty Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible Lab Instructor Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible (including but not limited to the Faculty of Record in relevant courses) Lab Assistant Post-probationary Teaching Faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible (including but not limited to the Faculty of Record in relevant courses) Professional Tutor Post-probationary Professional Tutors Librarian Post-probationary Librarians Licensed Professional Counselor Post-probationary Licensed Professional Counselors Academic Advisor Post-probationary Academic Advisors Teaching Clinician Post-probationary Teaching Faculty faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible Supplemental Instruction Leader Post-probationary Teaching Faculty faculty with expertise in the member’s discipline if possible Sign Language Interpreters Post-probationary Sign Language Interpreters The reviewing peers will be selected from faculty who volunteer or are nominated by other members of the faculty member’s department. The faculty member being reviewed may request that an alternate be assigned for legitimate reason. Whenever possible, the reviewing peer will be selected from those who are appropriately trained to perform peer performance assessments. The reviewing peer will observe the faculty member’s classroom/workplace performance for a minimum of one hour on at least one day during the academic year for which the review is scheduled. A second observation will be conducted if requested by the reviewing peer or the faculty member. The faculty member will be given at least seven days’ notice of each such observation. After each observation, the reviewing peer will document the strengths and weaknesses of the faculty member’s performance, will describe any recommendations for improvement, and will meet with the faculty member to discuss the observations and recommendations.
d. Self-Assessment As part of the periodic performance review, the faculty member being reviewed will write a self-assessment concerning the strengths and weaknesses of the faculty member’s performance and will describe any professional growth activities during the review period and any plans for future professional growth activities. The faculty member will submit the self-assessment, along with an updated curriculum vitae, to the responsible administrator at least one week prior to the meeting scheduled to discuss the comprehensive report.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement