Planning Proposal Authority (PPA Sample Clauses

Planning Proposal Authority (PPA. At its meeting of 6 April 2020, Council resolved that it would not be performing the role of the Planning Proposal Authority (PPA). A Gateway Determination was subsequently issued on 6 July 2020 by DPIE in the further processing of the Proposal. The SNRPP was appointed the PPA for this Proposal. The Planning Proposal was publicly exhibited from 29 October to 26 November 2020. On 30 November 2020, Council considered a report on the public exhibition of the proposal and resolved to object to the proposal. Following the exhibition of the Planning Proposal, to which 139 objections were received, the SNRPP conducted a public hearing on 17 March 2021 and on 23 March 2021, and subsequently issued a report recommending that the Planning Proposal proceed to be made. Subsequent to this decision, Council has made written representations to the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces, Local members and the Greater Sydney Commission, re-iterating its strong concern over the proposal. The amendment to the LEP was recently made by DPIE and came into effect on 31 August 2021. The amendment, as made, applies a maximum building height of RL 148 (approx. 29 storeys) on the portion of the site known as 179 Xxxxxx and 00 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx. This maximum height is only able to be achieved if the entire site is developed as a development site. The maximum heights applied to the remainder of the site are 000-000 Xxxxxx Xxxxxx – RL 89 and 00-00 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx RL 85 (approximately 8 storeys).
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Planning Proposal Authority (PPA

  • Proposed Corrective Action Plan Simultaneously with the submission of the Audit, the Recipient will submit to OCR for its review and approval a proposed Corrective Action Plan to address all inaccessible content and functionality identified during the Recipient’s Audit. The proposed Corrective Action Plan will set out a detailed schedule for: (1) addressing problems, taking into account identified priorities, with all corrective actions to be completed within 18 months of the date OCR approved the Corrective Action Plan; (2) setting up systems of accountability and verifying claims of accessibility by vendors or open sources; and setting up a system of testing and accountability to maintain the accessibility of all online content and functionality on an ongoing basis.

  • Bidding and Proposal Phase 1.5.1 In conjunction with the development of the Guaranteed Maximum Price and at other times as appropriate to the Project, the Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager by receiving and recording requests for Bid and Request for Proposal (“RFP”) Documents, receiving and resolving questions about Bid and RFP Documents; preparing addenda, issuing addenda, and accounting for addenda issued; attending pre-bid and pre-proposal conferences and HUB meetings; evaluating bids and proposals; and assisting in preparing and awarding multiple contracts for construction. Architect/Engineer shall answer inquiries from bidders and proposers at Owner’s request, and shall prepare and issue any necessary addenda to the bidding or proposal documents.

  • Technical Proposal The technical proposal may be presented in free format. It shall not exceed ten pages, not counting the CVs. It shall respect the following page limit and structure: • Technical methodology (max. 7 pages) • Quality management (max. 1 page) • Project management (max. 1 page) • Resource management (proposal (max. 1 page) + CVs of experts)

  • City Council Approval It is agreed that this MOU is of no force or affect until ratified by the City Council of the City of Lompoc.

  • Proposal of Corrective Action Plan In addition to the processes set forth in the Contract (e.g., service level agreements), if the Department or Customer determines that there is a performance deficiency that requires correction by the Contractor, then the Department or Customer will notify the Contractor. The correction must be made within a time-frame specified by the Department or Customer. The Contractor must provide the Department or Customer with a corrective action plan describing how the Contractor will address all performance deficiencies identified by the Department or Customer.

  • REGULATORY FILINGS AND CAISO TARIFF COMPLIANCE 3.1 Filing

  • ROAD WORK PHASE APPROVAL Purchaser shall obtain written approval from the Contract Administrator upon completion of each of the following phases of road work:  Drainage installation  Subgrade compaction  Rock compaction SUBSECTION RESTRICTIONS

  • Technical Proposals Technical proposal information will be streamlined, e.g., the Government anticipates written proposals consisting of thirty (30) pages or less stating compliance or exception to requirements, risks, assumptions and conflict of interest issues. Proposals shall not merely restate PWS/SOO requirements. Written technical proposals shall normally address: * Technical Approach and descriptive narrative of the contractor's understanding of the requested effort * PWS in response to a SOO * Integrated Master Plan (if applicable) * Integrated Master Schedule (if applicable) * Key Personnel Assigned * Quantities/Hours of Personnel by Labor Categories and narrative justification (if applicable) * Other Direct Costs (ODCs) (materials and supplies, travel, training, etc.(quantities and types only)) * Period of Performance * Government-Furnished Equipment (GFE)/Government-Furnished Information (GFI) * Security (including clearance level) * Teaming Arrangement (including subcontracting; identify new ACAs) * Small Business Plan (if a large business) * Other Pertinent Data, such as assumptions made.

  • Required Procurement Procedures for Obtaining Goods and Services The Grantee shall provide maximum open competition when procuring goods and services related to the grant-assisted project in accordance with Section 287.057, Florida Statutes.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.