Potential Funding Sources and Opportunities Sample Clauses

Potential Funding Sources and Opportunities. Our team has successfully helped communities around the country apply for and receive over $30 million in funding for pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Our staff has excellent contacts at FHWA, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, ITE, and APA, which allows us to monitor applications and gain an understanding of funding criteria. Our team is familiar with virtually all State and Federal sources of bicycle and pedestrian funding, including funding sources in the SAFETEA legislation. We are also aware that funding is much more likely from all sources when it comes from a variety of local, State, Federal, and public and private sources. In other words, most funding sources prefer to “leverage” other funds rather than provide the bulk of funding themselves. We will identify potential matching and major funding sources, associated criteria and requirements. Costs of the phased improvements will be compared with funding needs, so that long term programming for local matching funds can be accomplished. Staff assigned to this project have helped over 50 cities, counties, and regions around the United States receive funding. This funding has come from a variety of sources, including: • Local public works and parks and recreation CIP budgets • State agenciesFederal government • SAFETEA-LU (composed of eight separate funding sources) • Non-profit organizations • Corporate sponsorsZoning requirementsDevelopment feesAir quality grants •
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Potential Funding Sources and Opportunities

  • Training Opportunities The requirements of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended, 12 U.S.C. 1701u ("Section 3"), requiring that to the greatest extent feasible opportunities for training and employment be given to lower income residents of the project area and agreements for work in connection with the project be awarded to business concerns which are located in, or owned in substantial part by persons residing in, the areas of the project. Borrower agrees to include the following language in all subcontracts executed under this Agreement:

  • Goals Goals define availability, performance and other objectives of Service provisioning and delivery. Goals do not include remedies and failure to meet any Service Goal does not entitle Customer to a Service credit.

  • Profitability The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by XXXX under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs to XXXX, and pre-tax profits realized by XXXX, from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of DIMA and its affiliates with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board and the Fee Consultant reviewed XXXX’s methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by XXXX in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed certain publicly available information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that, while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates’ overall profitability with respect to the DWS Funds (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by XXXX and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of most comparable firms for which such data was available. Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund’s investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund’s fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.

  • INFORMATION OF THE PARTIES Information of the Company The Company is a company established in the PRC in 1984 and converted into a joint stock limited company on 28 September 2015. The principal business of the Company includes providing comprehensive leasing services to high-quality customers in industries including aviation, infrastructure, shipping, inclusive finance, new energy and high-end equipment manufacturing. Information of the Asset Transferor The Asset Transferor is a state-owned enterprise incorporated in the PRC on 28 March 2008 and located in Shanghai, the PRC, which is principally engaged in the business of finance lease, etc. IMPLICATIONS UNDER THE LISTING RULES According to Chapter 14 of the Listing Rules, as the highest applicable percentage ratio of the transaction under the Asset Transfer Agreement is higher than 5% but lower than 25%, the transaction constitutes a discloseable transaction of the Company and is subject to the announcement requirement but is exempt from the shareholders’ approval requirement under Chapter 14 of the Listing Rules.

  • Program Goals CalHFA MAC envisions that these monies would be used to complement other federal or lender programs designed specifically to stabilize communities by providing assistance to homeowners who have suffered a financial hardship and as a result are no longer financially able to afford their first-lien mortgage loan payments or their Property Expenses when associated with a Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (“HECM”) loan, only.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.