Pre-Award Audit Sample Clauses

Pre-Award Audit. The Agreement may exceed $250,000 and Contract was selected via a negotiated procurement. Therefore, Contractor has undergone a pre-award audit. The Federal Highway Administration, or Caltrans acting on its behalf, must issue a Pre-Award Evaluation/Recommendation Letter for the Project utilizing Contractor’s services before Contractor can proceed. An additional audit may need to be carried out if this Agreement is amended, legal requirements change, or circumstances warrant additional auditing. Contractor agrees to fully cooperate if an additional audit is requested. Attachments: Attachment 1 Subcontractor’s Statement of Eligibility Attachment 2 Public Contract Code Section 10162 Questionnaire/Statement of Eligibility Attachment 3 Certification of Restrictions on Lobbying Attachment 4 Disclosure of Lobbying Activities and Continuation Sheet Attachment 5 Instructions for Completion of SF-LLL Disclosure of Lobbying Activities Attachment 1 SUBCONTRACTOR'S STATEMENT OF ELIGIBILITY certifies that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in any federal project by any federal department or agency. Where the Subcontractor is unable to certify any of the statements in the certification, such Subcontractor shall attach an explanation with this form. The Subcontractor certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of the contents of the statements submitted on or with this certification and understands that the provisions of 31 U.S.C. Section 3801, et. seq., are applicable. Name of Firm Printed Name and Title of Signatory Signature: Date: PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 10162 QUESTIONNAIRE In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 10162, the Contractor shall complete, under penalty of perjury, the following questionnaire: Has the contractor, any officer of the contractor, or any employee of the contractor who has a proprietary interest in the contractor, ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing a federal, state, or local government project because of a violation of law or a safety regulation? YES □ NO □ If the answer is yes, explain the circumstances in the following space. Name of Contractor: Name of Signatory: Title: Signature of Contractor: Date: (SIGN HERE) STATEMENT OF ELIGIBILITY hereby certifies that it □ is □ is not (Must Check One) included on the U.S. Comptroller General's Consolidated List of Pe...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Pre-Award Audit. The Agreement may exceed $250,000 and Contract was selected via a negotiated procurement. Therefore, Contractor has undergone a pre-award audit. The Federal Highway Administration, or Caltrans acting on its behalf, must issue a Pre-Award Evaluation/Recommendation Letter for the Project utilizing Contractor’s services before Contractor can proceed. An additional audit may need to be carried out if this Agreement is amended, legal requirements change, or circumstances warrant additional auditing. Contractor agrees to fully cooperate if an additional audit is requested.
Sample 1

Related to Pre-Award Audit

  • Pre-Award Costs Pre-award costs are those incurred prior to the effective date of the award directly pursuant to the negotiation and in anticipation of the award where such costs are necessary to comply with the proposed delivery schedule or period of performance. Such costs are allowable only to the extent that they would have been allowable if incurred after the date of the award and only with the prior written approval of the Department.

  • Final Award Where the tribunal makes a final award against a party, the tribunal may award, separately or in combination, only:

  • PERFORMANCE PERIOD This Agreement shall be performed during the period which begins Oct 01 2020 and ends Sep 30 2022. All services under this Agreement must be rendered within this performance period, unless directly specified under a written change or extension provisioned under Article 14, which shall be fully executed by both parties to this Agreement.

  • Award Criteria 40.1 The Procuring Entity shall award the Contract to the successful tenderer whose tender has been determined to be the Lowest Evaluated Tender in accordance with procedures in Section 3: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Performance Pay In accordance with Section 8 of the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2020-2021, contingent upon the availability of funds and at the Agency Head’s discretion, each agency is authorized to grant merit pay increases based on the employee’s exemplary performance, as evidenced by a performance evaluation conducted pursuant to Rule 60L-35, Florida Administrative Code.

  • Compensation Committee (A) The Compensation Committee shall be composed of not more than five (5) members who shall be selected by the Board of Directors from its own members who are not officers of the Company and who shall hold office during the pleasure of the Board.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • The Committee For purposes of this Agreement, the term “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company or any replacement committee established under, and as more fully defined in, the Plan.

  • Grant Award On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, Triumph hereby agrees to make a grant (the “Grant”) to Grantee in the aggregate maximum amount of up to Two Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($200,000.00) (the “Maximum Grant Amount”) to provide partial funding for the Project.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!