Private Vehicle Availability Sample Clauses

Private Vehicle Availability. Given the focus of the UPA project on traffic congestion reduction and mode shift, a series of questions were asked regarding express bus users’ level of access to a private vehicle. Responses are summarized in Table 26 below. Table 26: Vehicle Availability 2010 UPA Survey 2009 UPA Survey 2008 UPA Survey Had access to a car or motor vehicle for No. of responses 1,146 349 455 Yes 77% 67% 80% surveyed trip No 23% 33% 20% No. of responses 1,000 000 000 Always 74% 65% 79% Level of access to a Most of the time 12% 17% 10% car or motor vehicle Occasionally 8% 10% 5% Never 6% 8% 4% Don’t know - - 2% 95 Express Bus riders were asked two different ways about their access to a personal vehicle. They were asked whether they had access to a personal vehicle for the trip they were making on the day of the survey. They were also asked what their normal level of access to a personal vehicle was. In both instances, it was clear that the majority of 95 Express Bus riders have regular access to a personal vehicle. This was the case before the project began, and it continues to be the case. This indicates that the 95 Express Bus Service has always attracted choice riders.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Private Vehicle Availability. Given the focus of the UPA project on traffic congestion reduction and mode shift, a series of questions were asked regarding 95 Express users’ level of access to a private vehicle. Responses are summarized in Table 16 below, along with the corresponding information from the 2005 MDT system wide survey and the 2008 UPA survey. Table 17 Vehicle Availability Question Category 2009 UPA 95X Survey 2008 UPA 95X Survey 2008 UPA 95X Survey (Northbound) 2005 MDT Survey (286 routes) N. (Population / Sample Size) 349 572 93 26,990 Car/Vehicle Available for this Trip Yes 66.8% 80.0% 70.4% No 33.2% 20.0% 29.6% 0 10.5% 7.6% 11.1% 32% 1 40.6% 35.7% 32.2% 50% Number of household vehicles 2 36.5% 39.7% 38.9% 13% 3 10.5% 12.6% 12.2% 4 1.5% 3.9% 5.6% 5% 5 or more 0.3% 0.6% 0.0% Level of access to a car/motor vehicle for personal use Always 65.3% 79.1% 77.8% Most of the time 16.7% 10.4% 10.0% Occasionally 9.9% 5.3% 3.3% Never 8.0% 3.8% 5.6% Don't know - 1.5% 3.3% With the 2009 survey sample again generally correlated with the 2008 survey sample, Table 17 shows that the majority of riders, 66.8 percent, have access to a car for their northbound trip on the 95 Express. This percentage is somewhat lower than the 80 percent figure observed in the 2008 survey, but correlates closely with the 70.4 percent figure calculated from the northbound sample of 2008 survey respondents. Overall, it appears that private vehicle availability is slightly lower for trips in the northbound direction, though its also possible that the economic recession may have negatively impacted the level of access to private autos.

Related to Private Vehicle Availability

  • Service Availability You understand that Service availability is at all times conditioned upon the corresponding operation and availability of the communication systems used in communicating your instructions and requests to the Credit Union. We will not be liable or have any responsibility of any kind for any loss or damage thereby incurred by you in the event of any failure or interruption of such communication systems or services resulting from the act or omission of any third party, or from any other cause not reasonably within the control of the Credit Union.

  • High Availability Registry Operator will conduct its operations using network and geographically diverse, redundant servers (including network-­‐level redundancy, end-­‐node level redundancy and the implementation of a load balancing scheme where applicable) to ensure continued operation in the case of technical failure (widespread or local), or an extraordinary occurrence or circumstance beyond the control of the Registry Operator. Registry Operator’s emergency operations department shall be available at all times to respond to extraordinary occurrences.

  • EPP service availability Refers to the ability of the TLD EPP servers as a group, to respond to commands from the Registry accredited Registrars, who already have credentials to the servers. The response shall include appropriate data from the Registry System. An EPP command with “EPP command RTT” 5 times higher than the corresponding SLR will be considered as unanswered. If 51% or more of the EPP testing probes see the EPP service as unavailable during a given time, the EPP service will be considered unavailable.

  • Funding Availability 1. This Contract is contingent upon the continued availability of funding. If funds become unavailable through the lack of appropriations, legislative or executive budget cuts, amendment of the Appropriations Act, state agency consolidation or any other disruptions of current appropriations, DFPS will reduce or terminate this Contract.

  • Fund Availability Financial obligations of the University payable after the current fiscal year are contingent upon funds for that purpose being appropriated, budgeted, and otherwise made available.

  • RDDS availability Refers to the ability of all the RDDS services for the TLD, to respond to queries from an Internet user with appropriate data from the relevant Registry System. If 51% or more of the RDDS testing probes see any of the RDDS services as unavailable during a given time, the RDDS will be considered unavailable.

  • System Availability System Availability percentage is calculated as follows:  Total MinutesintheMonth −Downtime   System Availability%age =  Total MinutesintheMonth *100    System Availability SLA (“SLA”) 99.5% System Availability percentage during each Month for productive versions Credit 2% of Monthly Subscription Fees for each 1% below SLA, not to exceed 100% of Monthly Subscription Fees Excluded Downtime Total Minutes in the Month attributable to: (i) a Scheduled Downtime for which a Regular Maintenance Window is described in Section 4 below, or (ii) any other Scheduled Downtime according to Section 4 for which the customer has been notified at least five (5) business days prior to such Scheduled Downtime or (iii) unavailability caused by factors outside of SAP’s reasonable control, such as unpredictable and unforeseeable events that could not have been avoided even if reasonable care had been exercised. Scheduled Downtime Scheduled Downtime for the applicable Cloud Services to which customer has subscribed is set forth in Section 4 below entitled “Maintenance Windows for Cloud Services”.

  • Product Availability Under no circumstances shall Company be responsible to Representative or anyone else for its failure to fill accepted orders, or for its delay in filling accepted orders, when such failure or delay is due to strike, accident, labor trouble, acts of nature, freight embargo, war, civil disturbance, vendor problems or any cause beyond Company's reasonable control.

  • Availability Control Personal Data will be protected against accidental or unauthorized destruction or loss. Measures: • SAP employs regular backup processes to provide restoration of business-critical systems as and when necessary. • SAP uses uninterrupted power supplies (for example: UPS, batteries, generators, etc.) to protect power availability to the Data Centers. • SAP has defined business contingency plans for business-critical processes and may offer disaster recovery strategies for business critical Services as further set out in the Documentation or incorporated into the Order Form for the relevant Cloud Service. • Emergency processes and systems are regularly tested.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!