REPEATED SAMPLING Sample Clauses

REPEATED SAMPLING. In the cases of A3, B2, B3 a repeated sampling, third sample C of two headlamps and fourth sample D of two headlamps, selected from stock manufactured after alignment, is necessary within two months' time after the notification. 3.1. The conformity is not contested 3.1.1. Following the sampling procedure shown in Figure 1 of this annex the conformity of mass-produced headlamps shall not be contested if the deviations of the measured values of the headlamps are: 3.1.1.1. sample C C1: one headlamp one headlamp not more than 0 per cent 20 per cent C2: both headlamps but go to sample D more than not more than 0 per cent 20 per cent 3.1.1.2. sample D D1: in the case of C2 both headlamps 0 per cent 3.1.2. or, if the conditions of paragraph 1.2.2. for sample C are fulfilled. 3.2. The conformity is contested 3.2.1. Following the sampling procedure shown in Figure 1 of this annex the conformity of mass-produced headlamps shall be contested and the manufacturer requested to make his production meet the requirements (alignment) if the deviations of the measured values of the headlamps are: 3.2.1.1. sample D D2: in the case of C2 one headlamp more than 0 per cent but not more than 20 per cent one headlamp not more than 20 per cent 3.2.1.2. or, if the conditions of paragraph 1.2.2. for sample C are not fulfilled. 3.3. Approval withdrawn 3.3.1. sample C C3: one headlamp not more than 20 per cent one headlamp more than 20 per cent C4: both headlamps more than 20 per cent 3.3.2. sample D D3: in the case of C2 one headlamp 0 or more than 0 per cent one headlamp more than 20 per cent 3.3.3. or, if the conditions of paragraph 1.2.2. for samples C and D are not fulfilled.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
REPEATED SAMPLING. In the case of A3, B2, B3 a repeated sampling, third sample C of two systems, selected from stock manufactured after alignment, is necessary within two months' time after the notification. 3.1. The conformity is not contested 3.1.1. Following the sampling procedure shown in Figure 1 of this annex the conformity of mass-produced shall not be contested if the deviations of the measured values of the are: 3.1.1.1. Sample C go to sample D 3.1.1.2. Sample D both systems 0 per cent 3.1.2. or if the conditions of paragraph 1.2.2. for sample C are fulfilled. 3.2. The conformity is contested 3.2.1. Following the sampling procedure shown in Figure 1 of this annex the conformity of mass-produced systems shall be contested and the manufacturer requested to make his production meet the requirements (alignment) if the deviations of the measured values of the systems are: Annex 7 3.2.1.1. Sample D D2: in the case of C2
Sample 1Sample 2
REPEATED SAMPLING. In the case of A3, B2, B3 a repeated sampling, third sample C of two headlamps, selected from stock manufactured after alignment, is necessary within two months' time after the notification. 3.1. The conformity is not contested 3.1.1. Following the sampling procedure shown in Figure 1 of this annex the conformity of mass-produced headlamps shall not be contested if the deviations of the measured values of the headlamps are: 3.1.1.1. sample C C1: one headlamp 0 per cent one headlamp not more than 20 per cent C2: both headlamps more than 0 per cent but not more than 20 per cent go to sample D 3.1.1.2. sample D D1: in the case of C2 both headlamps 0 per cent 3.1.2. or if the conditions of paragraph 1.2.2. for sample C are fulfilled. 3.2. The conformity is contested 3.2.1. Following the sampling procedure shown in Figure 1 of this annex the E/ECE/324 Rev.2/Add.111 Regulation No. 112 page 56 Annex 7 conformity of mass-produced headlamps shall be contested and the manufacturer requested to make his production meet the requirements (alignment) if the deviations of the measured values of the headlamps are: 3.2.1.1. sample D D2: in the case of C2 one headlamp more than 0 per cent but not more than 20 per cent one headlamp not more than 20 per cent
Sample 1
REPEATED SAMPLING. In the cases of A3, B2, B3 a repeated sampling, third sample C of two lamps and fourth sample D of two lamps, selected from stock manufactured after alignment, is necessary within two months’ time after the notification. 3.1 The conformity is not contested 3.1.1 Following the sampling procedure shown in Figure 1 of this annex the conformity of mass-produced lamps shall not be contested if the deviations of the measured values of the lamps are: 3.1.1.1 Sample C C1: one lamp 0% the other lamp not more than 20% C2: both lamps more than 0% but not more than 20% go to sample D 1.1.2 Sample D D1: in the case of C2 both lamps 0%
Sample 1
REPEATED SAMPLING. In the cases of A3, B2, B3 a repeated sampling, third sample C of two devices and fourth sample D of two devices, selected from stock manufactured after alignment, is necessary within two months' time after the notification. 3.1. The conformity is not contested 3.1.1. Following the sampling procedure shown in Figure 1 of this annex the conformity of mass-produced devices shall not be contested if the deviations of the measured values of the devices are: 3.1.1.1. sample C C1: one device 0 per cent one device not more than 20 per cent C2: both devices more than 0 per cent but not more than go to sample D 20 per cent 3.1.1.2. sample D D1: in the case of C2 both devices 0 per cent 3.2. The conformity is contested 3.2.1. Following the sampling procedure shown in Figure 1 of this annex the conformity of mass-produced devices shall be contested and the manufacturer requested to make his production meet the requirements (alignment) if the deviations of the measured values of the devices are: 3.2.1.1. sample D D2: in the case of C2 one device more than 0 per cent but not more than 20 per cent one device not more than 20 per cent 3.3. Approval withdrawn 3.3.1. sample C C3: one device not more than 20 per cent one device more than 20 per cent C4: both devices more than 20 per cent 3.3.2. sample D
Sample 1
REPEATED SAMPLING. In the cases of A3, B2, B3 a repeated sampling, third sample C of two lamps and fourth sample D of two lamps, selected from stock manufactured after alignment, is necessary within two months' time after the notification. 3.1. The conformity is not contested 3.1.1. Following the sampling procedure shown in Figure 1 of this annex the conformity of mass-produced lamps shall not be contested if the deviations of the measured values of the lamps are: 3.1.1.1. sample C C2: both lamps more than 0 per cent but not more than 20 per cent go to sample D 3.1.1.2. sample D D1: in the case of C2 both lamps 0 per cent 3.1.2. or, if the conditions of paragraph 1.2.2. for sample C are fulfilled. 3.2. The conformity is contested 3.2.1. Following the sampling procedure shown in Figure 1 of this annex the conformity of mass-produced lamps shall be contested and the manufacturer requested to make his production meet the requirements (alignment) if the deviations of the measured values of the lamps are: 3.2.1.1. sample D D2: in the case of C2 one lamp more than 0 per cent but not more than 20 per cent one lamp not more than 20 per cent 3.2.1.2. or, if the conditions of paragraph 1.2.2. for sample C are not fulfilled. E/ECE/324 Add.6/Rev.3 Regulation No. 7 page 35 Annex 7 3.3. Approval withdrawn 3.3.1. sample C C3: one lamp not more than 20 per cent one lamp more than 20 per cent C4: both lamps more than 20 per cent 3.3.2. sample D D3: in the case of C2 one lamp 0 or more than 0 per cent one lamp more than 20 per cent 3.3.3. or, if the conditions of paragraph 1.2.2. for samples C and D are not fulfilled.
Sample 1

Related to REPEATED SAMPLING

  • Sampling The Licensee agrees that the Composition is purchased as a “Work Made for Hire” whereby the clearing of any sampled materials is the responsibility of Licensee.

  • Testing Landlord shall have the right to conduct annual tests of the Premises to determine whether any contamination of the Premises or the Project has occurred as a result of Tenant’s use. Tenant shall be required to pay the cost of such annual test of the Premises; provided, however, that if Tenant conducts its own tests of the Premises using third party contractors and test procedures acceptable to Landlord which tests are certified to Landlord, Landlord shall accept such tests in lieu of the annual tests to be paid for by Tenant. In addition, at any time, and from time to time, prior to the expiration or earlier termination of the Term, Landlord shall have the right to conduct appropriate tests of the Premises and the Project to determine if contamination has occurred as a result of Tenant’s use of the Premises. In connection with such testing, upon the request of Landlord, Tenant shall deliver to Landlord or its consultant such non-proprietary information concerning the use of Hazardous Materials in or about the Premises by Tenant or any Tenant Party. If contamination has occurred for which Tenant is liable under this Section 30, Tenant shall pay all costs to conduct such tests. If no such contamination is found, Landlord shall pay the costs of such tests (which shall not constitute an Operating Expense). Landlord shall provide Tenant with a copy of all third party, non-confidential reports and tests of the Premises made by or on behalf of Landlord during the Term without representation or warranty and subject to a confidentiality agreement. Tenant shall, at its sole cost and expense, promptly and satisfactorily remediate any environmental conditions identified by such testing in accordance with all Environmental Requirements. Landlord’s receipt of or satisfaction with any environmental assessment in no way waives any rights which Landlord may have against Tenant.

  • Tests 7.7.1 If the Contract Documents, laws, ordinances, rules, regulations or orders of any public authority having jurisdiction require any portion of the Work to be inspected, tested or approved, the Contractor shall give the Architect timely notice of its readiness so the Architect may observe such inspection, testing or approval. The Contractor shall bear all costs of such inspections, tests or approvals conducted by public authorities. 7.7.2 If the Architect determines that any Work requires special inspection, testing, or approval which Subparagraph 7.7.1 does not include, he or she will, upon written authorization from the State, instruct the Contractor to order such special inspection, testing or approval, and the Contractor shall give notice as provided in Subparagraph 7.7.1. If such special inspection or testing reveals a failure of the Work to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall bear all costs thereof, including compensation for the Architect's additional services made necessary by such failure; otherwise the State shall bear such costs, and an appropriate Change Order shall be issued. 7.7.3 Required certificates of inspection, testing or approval shall be secured by the Contractor and promptly delivered by him to the Architect. 7.7.4 If the Architect is to observe inspections, tests or approvals required by the Contract Documents, he will do so promptly.

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 Telepak Networks will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. Telepak Networks must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non-designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, Telepak Networks will be required to provide the results of the Telepak Networks test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop. 2.1.6.2 Once Telepak Networks has isolated a trouble to the BellSouth provided Loop, and had issued a trouble report to BellSouth on the Loop, BellSouth will take the actions necessary to repair the Loop if a trouble actually exists. BellSouth will repair these Loops in the same time frames that BellSouth repairs similarly situated Loops to its End Users. 2.1.6.3 If Telepak Networks reports a trouble on a non-designed or designed Loop and no trouble actually exists, BellSouth will charge Telepak Networks for any dispatching and testing (both inside and outside the CO) required by BellSouth in order to confirm the Loop’s working status. 2.1.6.4 In the event BellSouth must dispatch to the end-user’s location more than once due to incorrect or incomplete information provided by Telepak Networks (e.g., incomplete address, incorrect contact name/number, etc.), BellSouth will xxxx Xxxxxxx Networks for each additional dispatch required to repair the circuit due to the incorrect/incomplete information provided. BellSouth will assess the applicable Trouble Determination rates from BellSouth’s FCC or state tariffs.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!