Resiliency. Punctual peak demands or long term high demands are reflected in the design of systems and services (memory, access and throughput capacities, etc) in order to ensure resilience and consistency of processing. • The infrastructure is designed to function under high demand and can handle peak demands.
Resiliency. During the term of the Agreement and all Orders and Statements of Work under the Agreement, Provider shall maintain a high availability (“HA”) solution and related plan that is consistent with Industry Standards for the Provider Services being provided. The HA solution is required to have a highly available technical architecture across all the application tiers (e.g., Web, application, database, etc.) with nodes deployed across different physical data centers (e.g., across AWS Availability Zones) with no more than one (1) hour of recovery time and data loss. If an HA solution is not able to be deployed, Provider shall maintain a disaster recovery (“DR”) solution and related plan that is consistent with Industry Standards for the Provider Services being provided. The DR solution will ensure identified critical capabilities are restored within a twenty-four (24)-hour period with no more than twelve (12) hours of data loss in the event of a declared disaster or major system outage. Provider will test the HA or DR solution and related plan at least twice annually or more frequently if test results indicate that critical systems were not capable of being recovered within the periods above. Provider will provide summary test results for each exercise which will include the actual recovery point (how much data lost, if any) and recovery times (time to bring back applications and/or the Provider Services, if not automated failover) achieved within the exercise. Provider will provide agreed upon action plans to promptly address and resolve any deficiencies, concerns, or issues that may prevent the critical functionality of the application and/or Provider Services from being recovered within twenty-four (24) hours in the event of a disaster or major system outage. Further, Provider will notify Accenture, in a timely manner, when Provider initiates Provider’s business continuity plan.
Resiliency. Resiliency is the confidence an individual has in their innate ability to overcome adverse situations (Xxxxxxxxxx, 2002). Resilience is an essential quality for educators to possess due to schools being a stressful environment in which to work (Xxxxxxx et al., 2011). Whether teachers work at well-sourced private schools, urban, suburban, rural, or public or charter schools, teaching is emotionally taxing and stressful (Kyriacou, 2001). Toxic stress plagues our schools and teachers through unreasonable demands, poor work conditions, unrealistic job performance expectations, and minimal supports or resources, which ultimately outpace teachers’ ability to cope and perform (Xxxx & Xxx, 2007). This ongoing stress reveals itself as decreased productivity for students, teachers, and school communities, which escalates into symptoms of ongoing trauma such as high levels of frustration, anxiety, dissociation, and eventually burnout (American Psychological Association, 2019). With roughly half a million U.S. educators leaving the teaching profession each year (Alliance for Excellent Education, 2014), increased resiliency of educators is crucial to help reduce this turnover rate of 20%. Attrition of first-year teachers has increased by 40% in the last two decades (Xxxxxxxxx et al., 2014). Factors causing attrition range from low morale; low salaries; increased accountability and expectations; classroom management; and student behavior to overall stress (Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxxx, 2008). The rate of physical and emotional fatigue is higher in urban secondary classrooms, in content areas of math, science, foreign languages, and special education (Xxxxxx-Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxx-Xxxxxxx, 2017). The Alliance for Excellent Education (2014), estimated that teacher attrition costs school districts roughly $2.2 billion per year.
Resiliency. GitLab will architect and maintain an underlying cloud infrastructure with commercially reasonable resiliency for all data, compute, and network services. At a minimum, GitLab will maintain the highest documented level of “GitLab Reference Architecture” as detailed on GitLab’s Website.
Resiliency. A key element for supporting youth at-risk. The Clearing House, 73(2), 121-123. Lake, S.E. Esq. (Ed.). (2000) Alternative schools: Legal guidance for serving special education students. Xxxxxxx, PA: LRP Publications. Xxxxx, X. (1998). Characteristics of alternative schools and programs serving at-risk students. The High School Journal, 81 (4), 183-197. Xxxxx, C., & Xxxx, C. (1997). At-risk students in second chance programs (Research Report No. 20). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Enrollment Options for Students with Disabilities Project. Xxxxx, C., & Xxxx, C. (1999a). At-risk students attending second chance programs: Measuring performance in desired outcome domains. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 4 (2), 173-192. Xxxxx, C., & Xxxx, C. (1999b). At-risk students in second chance programs: Reasons for transfer and continued attendance (Research Report No. 21). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Enrollment Options for Students with Disabilities Project. Xxxxx, C, & Xxxxxxx, S. (1995). Characteristics of alternative schools and programs serving at-risk students (Research Report No. 16). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Enrollment Options for Students with Disabilities Project. Xxxx, X. (1999). Students with and without disabilities attending alternative programs: Reasons for dropping out of an returning to school (Research Report No. 30). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Enrollment Options for Students with Disabilities Project. Xxxx, X., & Xxxxx, X. (2000). Students at risk attending high schools and alternative schools: Goals, barriers and accommodations. The Journal of At-Risk Issues, 6 (2), 11-21. Xxxxx, X.X., & Xxxxxxxxx, X. (1999). Alternative education: From a “last chance” to a proactive model. The Clearing House, 73 (2), 86-88. Xxxxxx, X. (1992, April). Secondary school students classified as seriously emotionally disturbed: How are they being served?. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association 1997 Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA. Xxx, X. X., & Xxxxxxxx, X.X. (1998). Academic persistence and alternative high schools: Student and site characteristics. The High School Journal, 81 (4), 199-208. Xxxxxx, X. (1991). Alternative education (XXXX Document Reproduction Service No. ED 349 652). Clemson, SC: National Dropout Prevention Center. National Center for Education Statistics (2000). Dropout rates in the United States: 1999 (NCES 2001-022). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Educ...
Resiliency. Multi Availability Zones are enabled on AWS and Company conducts Backup Restoration Testing on regular basis to ensure resiliency.
Resiliency. INCIDENT RESPONSE, BCP, AND DR Incident Response Emburse’s Incident Response Policy encompasses four principal phases: 1) preparation, 2) detection and analysis, 3) containment, eradication and recovery and 4) post-incident activity. When an incident is suspected, the appropriate resources are dedicated to validation and remediation. Depending on who reported the issue and how it is handled, the responsibility for remediation will lie with either the Emburse support or operations teams. The Security Incident Response Team (SIRT) Lead acts as the coordinator in response to all major security-related incidents or weaknesses. A major security incident or weakness is considered to be an impact to confidentiality (e.g., exfiltration of encryption keys), integrity (e.g., unanticipated data leakage or exfiltration), or availability (e.g., severe degradation of performance). The Incident Response Team Lead is responsible for assigning staff to work on specific tasks of the incident handling process and coordinating the overall incident response. All personnel involved in incident response and remediation are responsible for providing any needed information to members of the Incident Response Team. Any directives given by a member of the Security Incident Response Team may supersede the specifics of this policy. Emburse conducts a business risk analysis annually to evaluate and determine critical business processes and systems for all business functions. This includes an inventory of critical systems, measuring the overall potential operational impact of critical system disruption and assigning an appropriate RTO and RPO metric based on that criticality. All backups are encrypted. The detection of a disruption or disaster that could affect Emburse operations or application services is the responsibility of the Security Incident Response Team (SIRT). The specific responsibilities of the SIRT and associated groups are outlined in our ISO-certified Business Continuity Plan. The SIRT is automatically updated through monitoring services that provide notifications through email and phone. When a disruption or disaster occurs, the on-call SIRT member immediately makes an assessment of affected services. If necessary, they initiate the Disaster Recovery Plan and notify the other members of the Disaster Recovery Team (DRT).
Resiliency. In completing the final Cleanup Plan, the City of Ponderay also will evaluate the resilience of the remedial options in light of reasonably foreseeable changing climate conditions (e.g., sea level rise, increased frequency and intensity of flooding and/or extreme weather events, etc.). The alternatives may additionally consider the degree to which they reduce greenhouse gas discharges, reduce energy use or employ alternative energy sources, reduce volume of wastewater generated/disposed, reduce volume of materials taken to landfills, and recycle and re-use materials generated during the cleanup process to the maximum extent practicable. Objective: Develop a Voluntary Remediation Work Plan (VRWP) that equals an ABCA.
Resiliency. Leadership in sustainability, health and integration of the built and natural environments, and human interaction with the environment.
Resiliency. Changing environmental and climate conditions will have multiple and complex effects on the Chesapeake Bay. Rising sea levels and changes in precipitation patterns may make restoration more difficult to achieve, and increasing air and water temperatures may affect the integrity of healthy waters and watersheds. Building resiliency to these impacts now will ensure healthy and resilient Bay ecosystems and communities in the future. Goal: Increase the resiliency of the Chesapeake Bay watershed, including its habitats, public infrastructure and human communities to withstand adverse impacts from climate change.
