Review and Monitor Sample Clauses

Review and Monitor. Scrutinise, review and comment on the Annual Delivery Plan and monitor and review progress and risks relating to the plan
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review and Monitor. 3.1 To be reviewed when the Governing Body decide but at least every two years.
Review and Monitor a. The City and SFPD will implement the Remaining Recommendations and submit those recommendations to Cal DOJ for review. The City and SFPD will also provide additional documentation demonstrating substantial compliance with any of the Recommendations in Progress, if requested by Cal DOJ. This work will be done pursuant to a timetable and work plan referenced in Section 2, subdivision (b) below. b. Cal DOJ will serve as the independent third-party reviewer of SFPD’s implementation of the Remaining Recommendations and the Recommendations in Progress. As agreed upon on in the MOU and this Addendum, the standard of review for Cal DOJ’s evaluation of SFPD’s implementation of the recommendations and subsequent monitoring of completed recommendations is substantial compliance. c. Cal DOJ will serve as the independent third-party monitor of the Substantially Compliant Recommendations. Cal DOJ will continue to work with the Consultant as set forth in Section 2, subparagraphs (a) - (f) below on this monitoring. d. Cal DOJ will work with the Consultant to report to the public on SFPD’s progress in effectively and timely implementing the reforms referenced in the US DOJ Report, and specifically on SFPD’s implementation of the Remaining Recommendations and the Recommendations in Progress, and its ability to maintain the reforms described in the Substantially Compliant Recommendations. Copies of any reports will, upon issuance, be provided to SFPD, the City, and the Police Commission. e. In serving as the independent third-party reviewer and monitor, Cal DOJ will not supplant the roles and responsibilities of the City; SFPD, including its Chief of Police; Police Commission; or City boards, commissions, or officials. f. Under this Addendum, it is imperative that Cal DOJ have access to highly confidential and sensitive information. The information disclosed under this Addendum is “official information” under California Code of Evidence, section 1040 and disclosure to Cal DOJ under this Addendum shall not constitute waiver of the privilege as provided for under California Government Code, section 6254.5, subdivision (e). The Parties also agree that Cal DOJ’s input resulting from its review of SFPD’s implementation prior to Cal DOJ’s public report shall also be subject to the aforementioned provisions and will in addition be treated by the Parties as drafts and recommendations of Cal DOJ. These privileges will allow and xxxxxx the type of open and xxxxx discussion between ...
Review and Monitor. 3.1 To be reviewed when the Governing Body decide.
Review and Monitor. The parties will continue to review and monitor the operation of this agreement during its term.

Related to Review and Monitor

  • OIG INSPECTION, AUDIT, AND REVIEW RIGHTS ‌ In addition to any other rights OIG may have by statute, regulation, or contract, OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) may conduct interviews, examine or request copies of Xxxxxx’x books, records, and other documents and supporting materials and/or conduct on-site reviews of any of Xxxxxx’x locations for the purpose of verifying and evaluating: (a) Xxxxxx’x compliance with the terms of this IA and (b) Xxxxxx’x compliance with the requirements of the Federal health care programs. The documentation described above shall be made available by Xxxxxx to OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) at all reasonable times for inspection, audit, and/or reproduction. Furthermore, for purposes of this provision, OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) may interview Xxxxxx and any of Xxxxxx’x employees or contractors who consent to be interviewed at the individual’s place of business during normal business hours or at such other place and time as may be mutually agreed upon between the individual and OIG. Xxxxxx shall assist OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) in contacting and arranging interviews with such individuals upon OIG’s request. Xxxxxx’x employees and contractors may elect to be interviewed with or without a representative of Xxxxxx present.

  • Review of Documentation The Depositor, by execution and delivery hereof, acknowledges receipt of the Mortgage Files pertaining to the Mortgage Loans listed on the Mortgage Loan Schedule, subject to review thereof by Xxxxx Fargo Bank National Association, LaSalle Bank National Association, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and U.S. Bank National Association as applicable (each, a “Custodian” and, together, the “Custodians”), for the Depositor. Each Custodian is required to review, within 45 days following the Closing Date, each applicable Mortgage File. If in the course of such review the related Custodian identifies any Material Defect, the Seller shall be obligated to cure such Material Defect or to repurchase the related Mortgage Loan from the Depositor (or, at the direction of and on behalf of the Depositor, from the Trust Fund), or to substitute a Qualifying Substitute Mortgage Loan therefor, in each case to the same extent and in the same manner as the Depositor is obligated to the Trustee and the Trust Fund under Section 2.02(c) of the Trust Agreement.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Inspection Checklist (Check one)

  • Review Systems The Asset Representations Reviewer will maintain and utilize an electronic case management system to manage the Tests and provide systematic control over each step in the Review process and ensure consistency and repeatability among the Tests.

  • Access to Review Materials The Servicer will give the Asset Representations Reviewer access to the Review Materials for all of the Subject Receivables within sixty (60) calendar days after receipt of the review notice in one or more of the following ways in the Servicer’s reasonable discretion: (i) by electronic posting of Review Materials to a password-protected website to which the Asset Representations Reviewer has access, (ii) by providing originals or photocopies of documents relating to the Subject Receivables at one of the properties of the Servicer or (iii) in another manner agreed by the Servicer and the Asset Representations Reviewer. The Servicer may redact or remove PII from the Review Materials so long as all information in the Review Materials necessary for the Asset Representations Reviewer to complete the Asset Review remains intact and unchanged.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Contract Monitoring The criminal background checks required by this rule shall be national in scope, and must be conducted at least once every three (3) years. Contractor shall make the criminal background checks required by Paragraph IV.G.1 available for inspection and copying by DRS personnel upon request of DRS.

  • Operation and Maintenance Manuals Receipts for transmittal of Operation and Maintenance Manuals, Brochures and Data to the Design Professional (or Commissioning Agent) as required by Section 6.1.1.5.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!