Review Cycles. A/E’s Professional Services Schedule shall incorporate standard design milestone review cycles and shall include for each cycle the following: (i) Submittal of Deliverables; (ii) Initial review by Project Team [Owner, if not a CMR delivery]; (iii) review meeting to receive and discuss review comments;

Review Cycles. At designated review cycles each year, GBCI will conduct its review, which includes review of the Application and all accompanying documentation You provide therewith to determine compliance with certain WELL Building Standard feature requirements toward the determination of (i) the overall WELL Portfolio Score for the Defined Portfolio; (ii) if the Projects are eligible for WELL Certification (and if so, the appropriate level of WELL Certification to be conferred), (iii) recertification and/or (iv) WELL D&O (design and operations) designation or other awards or distinctions You may seek, as applicable. On site performance testing and performance review along with the assessment of all other information provided to GBCI is collectively referred to as “WELL Performance Verification” or “Performance Verification.” Documents and performance testing results may be uploaded at any time for Defined Portfolios and Projects within a Defined Portfolio, and the portfolio administrator may schedule up to two review cycles per year. Additional review cycles may be scheduled as an Optional Service for an additional fee. At each review cycle, GBCI will review documents and performance testing results that have been submitted through the Platform to date, across all Projects within the Defined Portfolio and across all document scales as such documents are further discussed in the Portfolio Guidebook.

Review Cycles. CxA’s Professional Services Schedule shall incorporate standard design milestone review cycles and shall include for each cycle the following: (i) Submittal of Deliverables; (ii) Initial review by Project Team [Owner, if not a CMR delivery]; (iii) review meeting to receive and discuss review comments;

Review Cycles. At designated review cycles each year, the individual(s) assigned to review Your Portfolio (“WELL Reviewer(s)”) will conduct its review, which includes review of the Application and all accompanying documentation You provide therewith to determine compliance with certain WELL Building Standard feature requirements toward the determination of (i) the overall WELL Portfolio Score for the Defined Portfolio; (ii) if the Projects are eligible for WELL Certification (and if so, the appropriate level of WELL Certification to be conferred), (iii) recertification and/or (iv) WELL Precertified designation, WELL Health-Safety Rating or other awards or designations You may seek, as applicable. On site performance testing and performance review along with the assessment of all other information provided to IWBI is collectively referred to as “WELL Performance Verification” or “Performance Verification.” Documents and performance testing results may be uploaded at any time for Defined Portfolios and Projects within a Defined Portfolio, and the portfolio administrator may schedule up to two review cycles per year. Additional review cycles may be scheduled as an Optional Service for an additional fee. At each review cycle, the WELL Reviewer will review documents and performance testing results that have been submitted through the Platform to date, across all Projects within the Defined Portfolio and across all document scales as such documents are further discussed in the Portfolio Guidebook. During a review cycle, an examination of documentation and performance testing results will be conducted to confirm compliance with the WELL Building Standard feature requirements. Reviews are conducted across Your Defined Portfolio.

Related to Review Cycles

Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).
Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.
Review Systems The Asset Representations Reviewer will maintain and utilize an electronic case management system to manage the Tests and provide systematic control over each step in the Review process and ensure consistency and repeatability among the Tests.
Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.
Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.
POST-REVIEW DISCOVERIES If, during the implementation of an undertaking, a previously unidentified property that may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register is encountered, or a known historic property may be affected in an unanticipated manner, the Agency Official shall follow 36 C.F.R. § 800.13(b). A. In the event that previously unidentified archeological sites or human remains are discovered during project construction, that portion of the project shall stop immediately and the project manager shall take appropriate steps to immediately secure the site, and shall notify the Agency Official within 48 hours. The Agency Official shall immediately notify the SHPO/THPO, Tribes, and other relevant consulting parties including descendent communities. B. If human remains are discovered, they shall be respectfully covered over and protected. In addition, the project manager shall immediately notify local and/or state law enforcement authorities including medical examiner or coroner, pursuant to local and state law. C. The Agency Official shall consult with the SHPO/THPO and Tribes or other descendent community representatives to determine if the discovered site appears eligible for the National Register. If it does appear eligible, the Agency Official shall submit a treatment plan for the avoidance, protection, recovery of information, or destruction without data recovery to the SHPO for review and comment. The treatment plan shall be consistent with the ACHP’s handbook Treatment of Archaeological Properties and subsequent amendments and SHPO Human Remains Discovery Protocol. If human remains are discovered, the treatment plan shall follow the guidance in Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Policy Statement Regarding Treatment of Burial Sites, Human Remains and Funerary Objects, including appropriate consultation with descendent communities. Avoidance and preservation in place are the preferred options for treating human remains. D. The Agency Official shall notify relevant consulting parties of the unanticipated discovery and provide the proposed treatment plan for their comment. Construction work in the area of the discovery shall not continue until the plan has been accepted by SHPO/THPO and implemented. E. An undertaking that may affect a human burial site shall comply with provisions of New York State and local laws, the terms of this Agreement notwithstanding.
Claims Review Report The IRO shall prepare a Claims Review Report as described in this Appendix for each Claims Review performed. The following information shall be included in the Claims Review Report for each Discovery Sample and Full Sample (if applicable).
Review Periods Owner shall have up to ten (10) Business Days from its receipt of the documents listed in Sections 1.3 and 1.4 above, to issue to Contractor written comments on such documents, Drawings and Specifications. The Owner’s approval rights only apply to documents listed in Section 1.3. If comments are not received for items listed in Section 1.3 in ten (10) Business Days, the Contractor may proceed with the development of the Drawings and Specifications with the design reflected in the uncommented document. Owner will annotate the Drawings and Specifications as appropriate and return to Contractor. In the event that Owner disapproves the Drawings or Specifications, Owner shall provide Contractor with a written statement of the reasons for such rejection within the time period required for Owner’s response, and Contractor shall provide Owner with agreed to revised and corrected Drawings and Specifications as soon as possible thereafter.
Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.
Review Reports Within five (5) days after the end of the applicable Review period under Section 3.3(b), the Asset Representations Reviewer will deliver to the Issuer, the Servicer, the Depositor, the Administrator and the Indenture Trustee a Review Report indicating for each Review Receivable whether there was a Test Pass, Test Fail or Test Complete for each related Test. For each Test Fail or Test Complete, the Review Report will indicate the related reason, including (for example) whether the Review Receivable was a Test Fail as a result of missing or incomplete Review Materials. The Review Report will contain a summary of the Review results to be included in the Issuer’s Form 10-D report for the Collection Period in which the Review Report is received. The Asset Representations Reviewer will ensure that the Review Report does not contain any PII. On reasonable request of the Servicer or the Administrator, the Asset Representations Reviewer will provide additional details on the Test results.

Review Cycles Sample Clauses

Filter & Search

Related Clauses

Parent Clauses

Related to Review Cycles