Review of Unsatisfactory Rating Sample Clauses

Review of Unsatisfactory Rating. 13.9.1 When an evaluatee wishes to review an unsatisfactory rating, an additional conference with the evaluator shall be held by the 5th workday in May. If the evaluator, however, is not the site administrator, the evaluatee and the evaluator shall confer with the site administrator by the 10th workday in May.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review of Unsatisfactory Rating. 13.9.1 When an evaluatee wishes to review a “beginning” and/or “developing” rating, an additional conference with the evaluator shall be held by the third Friday in April. If the evaluator, however, is not the site administrator, the evaluatee and the evaluator shall confer with the site administrator by the fourth Friday in April.

Related to Review of Unsatisfactory Rating

  • Industry Ratings The City will only accept coverage from an insurance carrier who offers proof that it:

  • Evaluation Rating The final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher based on the holistic review of all Evaluation Factors, observed during the Evaluation Cycle. The rating shall be “accomplished”, “skilled”, “developing”, or “ineffective”. The final rating shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) domain or component of the evaluation system has a higher importance than another, except that any area marked N/A shall not negatively impact the evaluation rating.

  • Excellent Above Average Satisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory 5 4 3 2 1 5. The instructor demonstrates knowledge of the subject matter.

  • Performance Rating Describes the Educator’s performance on each performance standard and overall. There shall be four performance ratings:  Exemplary: the Educator’s performance consistently and significantly exceeds the requirements of a standard or overall. The rating of exemplary on a standard indicates that practice significantly exceeds proficient and could serve as a model of practice on that standard district-wide.  Proficient: the Educator’s performance fully and consistently meets the requirements of a standard or overall. Proficient practice is understood to be fully satisfactory.

  • Insurance Company Rating The required insurance must be written by a company approved to do business in the State or Texas with a financial standing of at least an A- rating, as reflected in Best’s insurance ratings or by a similar rating system recognized within the insurance industry at the time the policy is issued.

  • Insurance Carrier Rating Coverages provided by Contractor must be underwritten by an insurance company deemed acceptable to the State of Washington’s Office of Risk Management. Insurance coverage shall be provided by companies authorized to do business within the State of Washington and rated A- Class VII or better in the most recently published edition of Best’s Insurance Rating. Enterprise Services reserves the right to reject all or any insurance carrier(s) with an unacceptable financial rating.

  • Credit Rating With respect to the Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor, its senior unsecured, unsubordinated long-term debt rating, not supported by third party credit enhancement, and if such debt is no longer rated, then the corporate or long-term issuer rating of Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor.

  • Moody’s Xxxxx’x Investors Service, Inc. and its successors.

  • Sound Level Company will take all reasonable measures to reduce to a minimum vibrations that may cause damage to any equipment, structure, building or portion of any building whether on the Premises, Common Use Areas, or located elsewhere on the Airport, and to keep the sound level of its operation as low as possible.

  • Rating The Notes can be issued without the requirement that they have any rating from a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.