Revisions from Original Proposal Sample Clauses

Revisions from Original Proposal. There were a number of changes from the original proposal, to reflect changing conditions and the increasing familiarity of the IRC with its partners and with the situation in Kono. However, the major elements of the proposal have remained the same, including: - Program site - Partners - Choice of interventions - Major strategies, such as use of quality assurance, the use of health information to improve decision-making, and community Integrated Management of Childhood Illness. Some changes include: Number of beneficiaries A village-by-village census done to prepare for the KPC survey revealed that the population in the program area was approximately 46,000, rather than the 100,000 estimated during proposal development. The IRC has addressed this discrepancy by working with the DHMT to add more health facilities to the program’s catchment area. The District Medical Officer has accepted this solution and assigned nine more PHUs to the Child Survival Program. The IRC will begin work in the thirteen PHUs mentioned in the original proposal. The other nine PHUs will be added around the time of the mid-term. The original program area will act essentially as a pilot site. Also, the KPC survey will continue to use the same program area, so that subsequent surveys can be compared to the original. Program data from the facility and community reports will be used to insure that the areas added later are also progressing. The field team may also decide to do a second KPC survey in the new area.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Revisions from Original Proposal. The main table included in the M&E section of the original proposal was revised and further detailed. The new table, which became the work plan for the first two years as required in the DIP guidelines, includes intermediate results (outcomes), as well as specific results and process indicators for the same range of interventions originally proposed. The target area remains the same. See Appendix 4 for the map of the target area. In addition, a revised budget is included, which reflects the new Project HOPE’s NICRA with USAID approved on May 7, 2003. See Appendix 5 for the Memorandum of Understanding with the MOH and Project HOPE. Detailed Implementation Plan

Related to Revisions from Original Proposal

  • Amendments - Changes/Extra Work The Subrecipient shall make no changes to this Contract without the County’s written consent. In the event that there are new or unforeseen requirements, the County has the discretion with the Subrecipient’s concurrence, to make changes at any time without changing the scope or price of the Contract.‌ If County-initiated changes or changes in laws or government regulations affect price, the Subrecipient’s ability to deliver services, or the project schedule, the Subrecipient will give County written notice no later ten (10) days from the date the law or regulation went into effect or the date the change was proposed and Subrecipient was notified of the change. Such changes shall be agreed to in writing and incorporated into a Contract amendment. Said amendment shall be issued by the County-assigned Contract Administrator, shall require the mutual consent of all Parties, and may be subject to approval by the County Board of Supervisors. Nothing herein shall prohibit the Subrecipient from proceeding with the work as originally set forth or as previously amended in this Contract.

  • Agreement Exceptions/Deviations Explanation If the proposing Vendor desires to deviate form the Vendor Agreement language, all such deviations must be listed on this attribute, with complete and detailed conditions and information included. TIPS will consider any deviations in its proposal award decisions, and TIPS reserves the right to accept or reject any proposal based upon any deviations indicated below. In the absence of any deviation entry on this attribute, the proposer assures TIPS of their full compliance with the Vendor Agreement. No response

  • EXCLUSIONS FROM THE BARGAINING UNIT 1. Any position that is currently included in the bargaining unit may not be excluded from the bargaining unit without the agreement of the parties.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.