Risk Assessment – General Outcome Sample Clauses

Risk Assessment – General Outcome. In June 2014, a special CCA working group meeting was held in Aix-en-Provence at the laboratory of SGS in order to discuss the test results and also to analyse and compare risk assessment methodology and results. The participating authorities felt that this was a very useful session since they all had the opportunity to directly discuss certain technical issues with the laboratory whilst looking directly at the respective samples that were tested. Additionally, it was found that it was easier to discuss risk assessment issues as the test samples were physically present during the meeting as well. The table below, extracted from the European Commission guidelines on risk assessment, depicts the two main factors leading to risk assessment: (i) the severity level of the injury and (ii) the probability of damage occurring during the foreseeable lifetime of the product. Most market surveillance authorities struggled when it came to identifying the probability factors. However, during the CCA meeting at SGS laboratory in Aix-en-Provence, each sample was discussed with all the group as well as the SGS experts. This helped to come up with a common approach in relation to probability factors for varying scenarios, which in turn ensured a more synergised approach to risk assessment. Although the risk assessment methodologies used were the same, this did not mean that the results were exactly the same throughout all the participating Member States. Certain risk scenarios developed by the participating authorities could be slightly different to one another. This may have been partly due to cultural differences in how high chairs are actually used within various Member States. One thing that needs to be addressed at a European level was the lack of accident data that was available. If such data was available, this would really improve the situation and further ensure that project results were backed up by concrete evidence when assessing the probability factors for accidents happening. Participating authorities and external stakeholders are both totally in agreement on the importance of having an updated European accident database. Figure 44 below, provides an overview of the risk levels found within the 70 samples tested by this working group. The remaining 30% of the samples had considerable risks. 17% of all samples were classified as having ‘serious risk’ whilst the remaining 13% were found to have ‘high risk’ factor. It is important to note that in the case of ser...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Risk Assessment – General Outcome

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Periodic Risk Assessment Provider further acknowledges and agrees to conduct periodic risk assessments and remediate any identified security and privacy vulnerabilities in a timely manner.

  • Risk Assessments a. Risk Assessment - DST shall, at least annually, perform risk assessments that are designed to identify material threats (both internal and external) against Fund Data, the likelihood of those threats Schedule 10.2 p.2 occurring and the impact of those threats upon DST organization to evaluate and analyze the appropriate level of information security safeguards (“Risk Assessments”). b. Risk Mitigation - DST shall use commercially reasonable efforts to manage, control and remediate threats identified in the Risk Assessments that it believes are likely to result in material unauthorized access, copying, use, processing, disclosure, alteration, transfer, loss or destruction of Fund Data, consistent with the Objective, and commensurate with the sensitivity of the Fund Data and the complexity and scope of the activities of DST pursuant to the Agreement. c. Security Controls Testing - DST shall, on approximately an annual basis, engage an independent external party to conduct a review (including information security) of DST’s systems that are related to the provision of services. DST shall have a process to review and evaluate high risk findings resulting from this testing.

  • Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract. a. The contractor shall notify all potential subcontractors and suppliers and lessors of their EEO obligations under this contract. b. The contractor will use good faith efforts to ensure subcontractor compliance with their EEO obligations.

  • Data Protection Impact Assessment and Prior Consultation Processor shall provide reasonable assistance to the Company with any data protection impact assessments, and prior consultations with Supervising Authorities or other competent data privacy authorities, which Company reasonably considers to be required by article 35 or 36 of the GDPR or equivalent provisions of any other Data Protection Law, in each case solely in relation to Processing of Company Personal Data by, and taking into account the nature of the Processing and information available to, the Contracted Processors.

  • Data Protection Impact Assessment If, pursuant to Data Protection Law, Customer (or its Controllers) are required to perform a data protection impact assessment or prior consultation with a regulator, at Customer’s request, SAP will provide such documents as are generally available for the Cloud Service (for example, this DPA, the Agreement, audit reports or certifications). Any additional assistance shall be mutually agreed between the Parties.

  • Loss Assessment We will pay up to $1000 for your share of loss assessment charged during the policy period against you by a corporation or as- sociation of property owners, when the assess- ment is made as a result of:

  • Geotechnical Engineer « »« » « » « » « » « »

  • Interconnection Facilities Engineering Procurement and Construction Interconnection Facilities, Network Upgrades, and Distribution Upgrades shall be studied, designed, and constructed pursuant to Good Utility Practice. Such studies, design and construction shall be based on the assumed accuracy and completeness of all technical information received by the Participating TO and the CAISO from the Interconnection Customer associated with interconnecting the Large Generating Facility.

  • Emergency Medical Condition a medical condition manifesting itself by acute symptoms of sufficient severity (including severe pain) that a prudent layperson, who possesses an average knowledge of health and medicine, could reasonably expect the absence of immediate medical attention to result in the following: a) Placing the health of the individual (or, with respect to a pregnant woman, the health of the woman or her unborn child) in serious jeopardy; b) Serious impairment to bodily functions; or c) Serious dysfunction of any bodily organ or part.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!