Roles and Relationships. Employer is the sponsor of a high deductible health plan (“HDHP”) that is compatible with health savings accounts (“HSAs”), as defined in §223 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”). Employer, as permitted by DOL FAB 2004-01 and 2006-02, desires to (i) facilitate the opening of HSAs for or on behalf of eligible employees (each, an “Account Holder”), (ii) make Employer contributions and forward employee payroll reduction contributions to HSAs owned by Account Holders, and (iii) pay certain fees related to HSA implementation and maintenance. HQY is an IRS authorized non-bank trustee operating as a custodian of HSAs in accordance with the provisions of Code §223(d)(1)(B) and Employer has selected HQY as its preferred custodian for Account Holders.
Roles and Relationships. Employer, operating as the sponsor of a health plan, “plan administrator” and “fiduciary” within the meaning of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, desires to provide certain health related reimbursement arrangements and/or other work-related benefits to its eligible employees (“Participants”). HQY provides third party administration (“TPA”) services for health reimbursement arrangements as defined in IRS Notice 2002-45 (“HRAs”), health flexible spending arrangements as defined in 26 USC § 125 and the regulations thereunder (“FSAs”), dependent care assistance programs as defined in 26 USC § 129 and the regulations thereunder (“DCRA”), and limited- purpose FSAs and post-deductible HRAs (each within the meaning of Rev. Rul. 2004-45).
Roles and Relationships identity and positioning - here the learning is concerned with relationships and groups’ understandings of themselves as a group within an AR context. The analysis uses conceptions of discursive order and subject positions, and addresses questions such as, who is a member? Who is a peer? Who is a counterpart? The analysis explores varying relationships to institutional structures – characterised here as ‘close’, ‘loose’ and ‘autonomous’ It is important to note that the three themes are present in many of the ARPs and that the themes themselves overlap in some ways (for example, some of the projects which addressed issues of citizenship and rights did so through an activist campaign). There are other themes that would also merit further exploration – for example the importance of recognition as ‘love, rights and solidarity’, and of experiences of misrecognition, in the work of these groups, and what that tells us about youth participation more generally (Honneth, 1995; Xxxxxx, 2012; see also Partispace Glossary). Nonetheless, the three thematic approaches together enable a rich exploration of the theoretical learning from these projects that helps to answer Partispace’s central research questions about the styles and spaces of young people’s participation. Each of the thematic chapters draws on particular examples from the ARPs that best illustrate these themes. The following chapter begins this analysis with the theme ‘on the margins of citizenship’.
Roles and Relationships summary and discussion Most of the ARP cases presented in this chapter, are based on a wish for a changed state, in some regard. The motives for participating in this change-work seem also quite often to be associated with ethical values – something is sensed as wrong, unfair or immoral, and many of the participants seem to perceive the engagement in the ARP as a chance to solve a problem or to give remedy to a shortage- situation (such as lack of members, social spaces or compassion and understanding in society). To be able to do something about the problematic situation, the groups needed to agree on a common approach in their ARP work. They also had to make a preliminary definition about what or who constituted the problem. However, to define a social situation, a problem and a possible solution, cannot be done in an objective and neutral way – certain discourse orders, subject positions and identity-offers are inevitably produced and reproduced (Xxxxxxxxxx 1989/2001, Xxxxxxxxxxxxx 1993, 1997). So, when defining “the problem”, the groups also became involved in defining for example, the social context, themselves, their actions and other involved actors. This social definition-work, has been the focus in this chapter, and the analysis has shown that through the ARP process, different positioning patterns have occurred. In this section, some of the most recurring or in other way interesting formation-patterns are highlighted and discussed. ”We” in the group – friendly equals or task-oriented colleagues? A challenge all ARP groups had to face, were to form themselves in a functional way in relation to the aim of their project. Depending on the context, it seems like the groups placed themselves on a continuum from ‘friendly equals’ to ‘task-oriented colleagues’. Closest to the ‘friendly equals’-pole was the Drama Group members. They entered the ARP work as equals in all respects, and never really managed to transform into something else. For the working process, this meant some disadvantages. All through the ARP process, they dealt with problems in setting up commonly accepted boundaries between their friendship and work relations. In the absence of a negotiated task-division, it also happened that individual members took initiatives, that the rest of the group did not agree on, which each time meant a halt in the working process. Other groups, for example Young Entrepreneurship Association, Free Sport Association and Girls Group, where more ‘task-oriente...
Roles and Relationships. General responsibilities The Service Provider will: perform the Services under the Contract: diligently; competently, professionally and with due care and skill; in accordance with the Agreed RMAP and as Directed by RTA from time to time; and otherwise in accordance with the terms of the Contract; ensure that any subcontractor appointed by it performs that part of the Services with the skill, care and diligence expected of a contractor experienced in performing Services of the type performed by the subcontractor; and comply with the Law. RTA will: pay the Service Provider the Routine Services Fee, the Ordered Work Price and any other amounts due under the Contract for the Service Provider's performance of the Services in accordance with the Contract; and perform and observe its other obligations under the Contract. RTA may give Directions to the Service Provider concerning the Services and the Service Provider will comply with such Directions. Authorised person The Service Provider will ensure that at all times there is an appropriately experienced and qualified person appointed to act with the Service Provider's full authority in all matters relating to the Contract as the Service Provider's authorised person and the Service Provider will keep RTA informed in writing of the name of that person, and of any change. If RTA reasonably objects to the person appointed from time to time, the Service Provider will replace that person. RTA will ensure that there is a person appointed to act on behalf of RTA in relation to the Contract as RTA's authorised person and will advise the Service Provider in writing of any limitations or qualifications to the powers of RTA's authorised person. RTA will keep the Service Provider informed in writing of the name of that person and of any change. The person does not act as independent certifier, assessor or valuer. The person acts only as agent of RTA. RTA's authorised person: may from time to time appoint named persons to exercise any or all of the powers and functions of RTA's authorised person (Authorised Delegates); and will notify the Service Provider in writing of any such appointment and the powers and functions delegated. A delegation under this clause will not prevent RTA's authorised person from exercising the delegated power or function. RTA may revoke an appointment at any time by notice to the Service Provider. An Authorised Delegate may on the same terms delegate the exercise of all or any of the powers and func...
