Secrecy Analysis Sample Clauses

Secrecy Analysis. We need to show that for the proposed encoder and decoder, the equivocation at the eavesdropper satisfies n (1) (31) function of (ui, si). Hence we have that where on(1) is a term that goes to zero as n → ∞. Σn H(y n|sn, un) = H(ye,i|si, ui). (35) Note that while the key κ in general can be a function of (sn, mx ) as indicated in (1), in our coding scheme the secret key is a deterministic functino of un and hence we have Furthermore note that e 1 | H(κ y n) = H(κ, un|y n) − e | H(un y n, κ) Σn e 1 ≤ H(y n) H(yei). (36) e 1 1 n n 1 n n = H(u |ye ) − n H(u |ye , κ) Finally, in order to lower bound the term n; y n|un) we e = H(un|y n) − εn let J to be a random variable which equals 1 if (sn, un) are n jointly typical. Note that Pr(J = 1) = 1 − on(1). where the last step follows from the fact that there are 1 I(sn; y n|un) = 1 H(sn|un) − 1 H(sn|un, y n) e e T0 = 2n(I(u;ye)−εn ) sequences in each bin. Again applying n n n the packing lemma we can show that with high probability 1 n n 1 n n n ≥ H(s |u , J = 1) Pr(J = 1) − H(s |u , y ) the eavesdropper uniquely finds the codeword un(L) jointly n n e typical with y n in this set and hence Xxxx’s Inequality implies 1 n n 1 n n n ≥ H(s |u , J = 1) − H(s |u , y ) − o (1) that e 1 n n 1 n n n It remains to show that |ye , κ) ≤ εn. ≥ H(s|u) − n H(s 1 Σn |u , ye ) − on(1) (37) 1 H(un |ye ) ≥ I(u; yr) − I(u; ye) − on(1). ≥ H(s|u) − n i=1 H(si|ui, ye,i) − on(1) (38) n Using the chain rule of the joint entropy we have where (37) follows from the fact that sn is an i.i.d. sequence 1 n n 1 n 1 n n 1 n and hence conditioned on the fact that (sn, un) is a pair of |ye ) = n H(u ) + n H(ye |u ) − n H(ye ) (32) typical sequence there are 2nH(s|u)−non(1) possible sequences 1 n 1 n n n 1 n 1 n n n sn. = H(u ) + n H(ye |u , s ) − n H(ye ) + n I(s ; ye |u ).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Secrecy Analysis. R− = We need to show that for the proposed encoder and decoder, the equivocation at the eavesdropper satisfies
Secrecy Analysis. First, consider splitting y n = and finally from the chain rule (y n1 , . . . , y nM ) where the subsequence y nj is obtained by grouping the symbols of ye when s = sj. From the con- e1 eM ej → ∞ 1 H(y n) ≤ 1 H(y ) → H(y ) (60) ei e struction of the wiretap codebook Cj it follows that j ej j n 1 H(κ |y nj ) ≥ 1 H(κ ) − ε , j = 1, . . . , M (49) as n . Substituting (55), (58), (59) and (60) into (54) completes the claim. The secrecy analysis can be completed by combining (51) Next since the messages are selected independently and the encoding functions are also independent it follows that and (52) as shown below. 1 H(κM , κ |y n) = 1 H(κM |κ , y n) + 1 H(κ |y n) (61) e H(κj|κ1, . . . , κj−1, κj+1, . . . , κM , y n, sn) n 1 s e n 1 s e n s e n ≥ H(κM |sn, y n) + H(κs|y n) (62) = H(κj|y n ) ≥ 1 n 1 H(κj) − εn (50) e n e 1 n ej n e ≥ I(u; yr|s) − I(u; ye|s) + H(κs|y ) − on(1) (63) Thus by the chain rule we have that 1 n n 1 n n e 1 H(κ1, . . . , κM |y n, sn) ≥ R0 − εn (51) ≥ I(u; yr|s)−I(u; ye|s)+ n H(s |ye ) − n H(s |ye , κs)−on(1) (64) | − | where R0 = H(κ1, . . . , κM ) = I(u; yr s) I(u; ye s). To complete the secrecy analysis we require the following addi- ≥ I(u; yr|s) − I(u; ye|s) + H(s|ye) − n H(s |ye , κs) − on(1) n n

Related to Secrecy Analysis

  • Risk Analysis The Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to Securities Depositories operating in the countries listed in Appendix B. If the Custodian is unable to provide a Risk Analysis with respect to a particular Securities Depository, it will notify the Fund. If a new Securities Depository commences operation in one of the Appendix B countries, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis in a reasonably practicable time after such Securities Depository becomes operational. If a new country is added to Appendix B, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to each Securities Depository in that country within a reasonably practicable time after the addition of the country to Appendix B.

  • Research Analyst Independence The Company acknowledges that the Underwriters’ research analysts and research departments are required to be independent from their respective investment banking divisions and are subject to certain regulations and internal policies, and that such Underwriters’ research analysts may hold views and make statements or investment recommendations and/or publish research reports with respect to the Company and/or the offering that differ from the views of their respective investment banking divisions. The Company hereby waives and releases, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any claims that the Company may have against the Underwriters with respect to any conflict of interest that may arise from the fact that the views expressed by their independent research analysts and research departments may be different from or inconsistent with the views or advice communicated to the Company by such Underwriters’ investment banking divisions. The Company acknowledges that each of the Underwriters is a full service securities firm and as such from time to time, subject to applicable securities laws, may effect transactions for its own account or the account of its customers and hold long or short positions in debt or equity securities of the companies that may be the subject of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics

  • Sampling and Analysis The Seller has sole responsibility for quality control of the coal and shall forward its “as loaded” quality to the Buyer as soon as possible. The sampling and analysis of the coal delivered hereunder shall be performed by Buyer and the results thereof shall be accepted and used for the quality and characteristics of the coal delivered under this Agreement. All analyses shall be made in Buyer’s laboratory at Buyer’s expense in accordance with ASTM standards where applicable, or using standards mutually acceptable to both parties. Samples for analyses shall be taken by any ASTM standards or standards mutually acceptable to both parties, and may be composited and shall be taken with a frequency and regularity sufficient to provide reasonably accurate representative samples of the deliveries made hereunder. Seller represents that it is familiar with Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices, and finds them to be acceptable. Buyer shall notify Seller in writing of any significant changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices. Any such changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices shall, except for ASTM or mutually agreeable changes in practices, provide for no less accuracy than the sampling and analysis practices existing at the time of the execution of this Agreement, unless the Parties otherwise mutually agree. (1) part shall be used for analysis by Buyer; one (l) part shall be used by Buyer as a check sample, if Buyer in its sole judgment determines it is necessary; one (1) part shall be retained by Buyer (LG&E) until the twenty-fifth (25th) of the month following the month of unloading (the “LG&E Disposal Date”) or Buyer (KU) until thirty (30) days after the sample is taken (the “KU Disposal Date”), the LG&E Disposal Date and the KU Disposal Date are collectively the “Disposal Date”), and shall be delivered to Seller for analysis if Seller so requests before the Disposal Date; and one part (“Referee Sample”) shall be retained by Buyer until the Disposal Date. Seller shall be given copies of all analyses made by Buyer by the tenth (10th) business day of the month following the month of unloading. Seller, on reasonable notice to Buyer shall have the right to have a representative present to observe the sampling and analyses performed by Buyer. Unless Seller requests a Referee Sample analysis before the Disposal Date, Buyer’s analysis shall be used to determine the quality of the coal delivered hereunder. The Monthly Weighted Averages shall be determined by utilizing the individual shipment analyses. If any dispute arises before the Disposal Date, the Referee Sample retained by Buyer shall be submitted for analysis to an independent commercial testing laboratory (“Independent Lab”) mutually chosen by Buyer and Seller. For each coal quality specification in question, a dispute shall be deemed not to exist and Buyer’s analysis shall prevail and the analysis of the Independent Lab shall be disregarded if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs from the analysis of Buyer by an amount equal to or less than: (i) 0.50% moisture (ii) 0.50% ash on a dry basis (iii) 100 Btu/lb. on a dry basis (iv) 0.10% sulfur on a dry basis. For each coal quality specification in question, if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs from the analysis of Buyer by an amount more than the amounts listed above, then the analysis of the Independent Lab shall prevail and Buyer’s analysis shall be disregarded. The cost of the analysis made by the Independent Lab shall be borne by Seller to the extent that Buyer’s analysis prevails and by Buyer to the extent that the analysis of the Independent Lab prevails.

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”

  • Escrow Analysis If applicable, with respect to each Mortgage Loan, the Seller has within the last twelve months (unless such Mortgage was originated within such twelve month period) analyzed the required Escrow Payments for each Mortgage and adjusted the amount of such payments so that, assuming all required payments are timely made, any deficiency will be eliminated on or before the first anniversary of such analysis, or any overage will be refunded to the Mortgagor, in accordance with RESPA and any other applicable law;

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • Disturbance Analysis Data Exchange The Parties will cooperate with one another and the NYISO in the analysis of disturbances to either the Large Generating Facility or the New York State Transmission System by gathering and providing access to any information relating to any disturbance, including information from disturbance recording equipment, protective relay targets, breaker operations and sequence of events records, and any disturbance information required by Good Utility Practice.

  • Protocols Each party hereby agrees that the inclusion of additional protocols may be required to make this Agreement specific. All such protocols shall be negotiated, determined and agreed upon by both parties hereto.

  • Quality Assurance The parties endorse the underlying principles of the Company’s Quality Management System, which seeks to ensure that its services are provided in a manner which best conforms to the requirements of the contract with its customer. This requires the Company to establish and maintain, implement, train and continuously improve its procedures and processes, and the employees to follow the procedures, document their compliance and participate in the improvement process. In particular, this will require employees to regularly and reliably fill out documentation and checklists to signify that work has been carried out in accordance with the customer’s specific requirements. Where necessary, training will be provided in these activities.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!