See Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, The Sounds of Silence: Default Rules and Contractual Consent, 78 VA. L. REV. 821, 884-85 (1992) ("Partnership law also provides an example of a default rule that defies common sense."). Corporate and LLC capital losses are suffered by individual shareholders. No obligation exists for the entity to repay a capital loss, let alone for another shareholder to repay. Corporate and LLC law make no distinction between shares and interests purchased with money and shares and interest purchased with services or the promise of services. See, e.g.,
See Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxxx, The Manila Water Privatization Fiasco and the Role of Suez Lyonnaise/Ondeo: Presentation at the Summit for Another World 1-2 (May 20, 2003), xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/altreg-docs/manila.pdf. 100. BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 1267 (8th ed. 2004).
See Xxxxx X. Xxxx Mem’l Hosp., 460 U.S. at 23. 89 424 U.S. 800 (1976). 90 See Def. Mem. at 15-16 (stating, e.g., “Claim 1, which seeks a declaratory judgment of noninfringement, should be dismissed because it contains only a conclusory statement that there is ‘an actual controversy’ between the parties with respect to whether Hon Hai infringes the ‘402 Patent.”) (quoting Compl. ¶ 21). above.
See Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Deferred Prosecution and Non-Prosecution Agreements and the Erosion of Corporate Criminal Liability, 72 MD. L. REV. 1295, 1301 (2013).
See Xxxxx X. Xxxxx, Note, Religious Visitation Constraints on the Noncustodial Parent: The Need for National Application of a Uniform Compelling Interest Test , 71 IND. X.X. 815, 820 (1996) (discussing the substantial harm standard, and arguing that despite its consistent applica- tion, the standard’s vague language fails to ensure a consistent level of protection for the non- custodial parent’s rights).
See Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx, Comment, The Uniform Premarital Agreement Act and
See Xxxxx X. X. Xxxx, The Epistle to the Galatians (Peabody, MA: Xxxxxxxxxxx, 0000), 159. argumentative or doctrinal portion,”29 these chapters actually tell Paul’s version of Israel’s story, running from the promises made to Xxxxxxx, through the period of the law, to the coming of faith. The foregrounded individuals include Xxxxxxx (3:6ff.), Scripture (3:8, 22), God (3:18), angels (3:19), faith (3:25), and the Galatians (3:26-29). Specific indications of time30 and causal connections between events31 carry the argument forward, and the story progresses from promises originally made through the fulfillment of those promises. Though there are certainly “argumentative” and “doctrinal” parts of chs. 3-4, Xxxx essentially re-tells the story of Israel, organizing the major events in the history of Israel around the coming of Xxxxxx. A third story, that of the Galatians’ past, is told throughout the letter. It is also marked by temporal and causal connections, characters, including the Galatians, God, Xxxxxx, and Xxxx, and a progression from a life “being enslaved to those things which are not by nature gods” to “now knowing God, or rather being known by God” (4:8-9).32 Xxxx continues to make reference to their progression from paganism, to an experience with the spirit, to their present situation, in which they are tempted by others to deny their progress. Galatians, therefore, does contain narratives, or at least narrative fragments, and one could consider the letter from this perspective.
See Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, We the People: Each and Every One, 000 Xxxx X.X. 2576, 2601–02 (2014).
See Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Env’t Remediation Tr., 633 F.3d 828, 833 (9th Cir. 2011) (noting such orders are authorized by district judge’s “broad discretion to manage discovery and to control the course of litigation under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16”).
