The Argument Sample Clauses

The Argument. As agreed, the parties will not cite legal precedents but may refer to Xxxxx and Beatty, Palmer, etc. However, it is imperative that the relevant provisions of the Collective Agreement be canvassed by counsel to ensure that all relevant clauses are put before the arbitrator.

The Argument. The Parties will not cite legal precedents but may refer to Xxxxx and Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx, etc. However, it is imperative that the relevant provisions of the Collective Agreement be canvassed by each Party to ensure that all relevant clauses are put before the arbitrator.

The Argument. Unless otherwise mutually agreed, the parties will not cite legal precedents but may refer to authorities such as Xxxxx and Beatty, Palmer, etc. However, it is imperative that the relevant provisions of the Collective Agreement be canvassed to ensure that all relevant provisions are put before the mediator-arbitrator.

The Argument. As agreed, the parties will not cite legal precedents but may refer to Xxxxx and Beatty, Palmer, etc.

The Argument. I shall, in brief state the arguments and submissions of the plaintiff and Defendant. Mr. Yada Xxxxxxxx Counsel for the Plaintiff in his argument submitted xx.xx the P!.1intiff is challenging Sections 26, 27, and 32 - 37 of the Act 1965. These sections impinge or violate Section 25 (i) of the Constitution of Sierra Leone. There argument is not that the right to Freedom of expression is unlimited; but that these' sections contravene Section 25(i) of the Constitution. He referred to several authorities in support of his argument and that the reasons given in these cases were that they were in conflict with the Constitution of the said countries which guarantees freedom of expression in a democratic state and whatever provision in the Constitution must be democratic and objective. He submitted further that we do not have to adhere to our local standard, but to universal standard. To uphold the limitation, the burden rest on those who create the limitation to justify it. Finally he submitted that Sec. 25 (ii) creates a limitation upon the freedom of expression the extent to which the freedom of expression can be limited. The , 9 government cannot go around limiting the freedom of expression even if the first "'" huddle is crossed, The limitation created should be justified in a democratic state. Xx. Xxxxxx: Counsel for the 1st defendant submitted that his colleague has conceded that freedom of expression cannot be unlimited. He submitted that the Plaintiff did not invoke the court's jurisdiction as provided under Section 124 of the Constitution; which empowers the court in all matters to interpret the Constitution. He cites the case of Pepper v Xxxx 1993 1A.E.R.P. 50 He submitted that there are multi dimensional rule of interpretation of statute. includes the ordinc1ry meaning of the word; plus the context of the legislation, the subject matter the scope and purpose. He submitted that when reading sec. 25 (i) of the constitution, it should be read in the context and subject matter in which sec. 25 (i) of the constitution - the recognition and protection of fundamental human rights. It is essential to recognize the scope under sec. 25 (1) and the limitation provided under sec 25(11) of the Constitution. He submitted further where there is a legal restriction on the exercise of the freedom of expression under section 25 (i). That legal restriction is that of the Public Order Act 1965. He submitted that Public Order Act when read in its entirety provides the mech...

The Argument. The installation head or designee of the installation head must review and con- cur in a proposed suspension or removal prior to the issuing manager's issuance of the ac- tion. This "review" must not be just a perfunctory glance and nod, but rather an actual review and investigation to ensure the conclusions the issuing manager is proposing are accurate. The reviewing official must also ensure the issuing manager has conducted an investigation which meets the requirements of the Just Cause process including a pre-disciplinary inter- view. If the reviewing official does nothing more than glance and nod with no questions, no checking, no effort to ensure accuracy and due process, then Article

The Argument. The Parties will be limited to the usage of three (3) legal cases but may refer to Xxxxx and Beatty, Xxxxxx, etc. However, it is imperative that the relevant provisions of the Collective Agreement be canvassed by each Party to ensure that all relevant clauses are put before the arbitrator.

The Argument. Existing approaches 1. Gender in declension 2. Gender declension 3. Very few gender in declension 1. Feminine agreement contexts differ by the presence of a feminine gender feature in a noun phrase. 2. Restrictions are due to inability to insert an inflectional exponent. ã→ Additional gender feature rules out insertion of a nominal inflectional exponent. 3. Feminine agreement is acceptable only in those cells of a paradigm where class I inflection is syncretic to class III. These exponents are underspecified for gender.

The Argument. It is imperative that the relevant provisions of the Collective Agreement be canvassed to ensure that all relevant clauses are put before the Arbitrator.

The Argument. As agreed, the parties will not cite legal precedents but may refer to Xxxxx and Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx, etc.