Standards of Review Sample Clauses

Standards of Review. In exercising any authority created by the Easement to inspect the Façades; to review any construction, alteration, repair, or maintenance; or to review casualty damage or to reconstruct or approve reconstruction of the Façades following casualty damage, Grantee shall apply the Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings issued and as may be amended from time to time by the Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior (hereinafter “the Standards”), as well as the Park City Design Guidelines for Historic Districts and Historic Sites (hereinafter “the Guidelines”) and any state guidelines considered appropriate by Grantee for review of work affecting historically or architecturally significant structures or for construction of new structures within historically or architecturally significant structures or for construction of new structures within historically, architecturally, or culturally significant sites or areas. In the event the Standards or Guidelines are abandoned or materially altered or otherwise become, in the reasonable judgment of Grantee, inappropriate for the purposes set forth above, Grantee may apply reasonable alternative standards and notify Grantor of the substituted standards.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Standards of Review. The Compliance Officer will perform the following functions:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Standards of Review. A. Factual Findings and Conclusions of Law
Sample 1Sample 2
Standards of Review. The standards for review shall be whether there is good cause to conclude: (1) that the intent and purpose of the Sabbatical Leave of Absence have not been satisfied; or (2) that the Sabbatical Leave of Absence Report was not submitted within the required time period, or in the form and content prescribed. And if so, what is the appropriate penalty?
Sample 1Sample 2
Standards of Review. Our scope of review in an appeal from an orphans’ court’s decision is limited. When reviewing the orphans’ court’s decision, we must determine whether the record is free from legal error and the orphans’ court’s factual findings are supported by the evidence. In re Estate of Angle, 777 A.2d 114, 122 (Pa. Super. 2001).
Sample 1
Standards of Review. In exercising any authority created by the Easement to inspect the Façades; to review any construction, alteration, repair, or maintenance; or to review casualty damage or to reconstruct or approve reconstruction of the Façades followingcasualty damage, DDA shall apply the Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings issued and as may be amended from time to time by the Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior (hereinafter “the Standards”) and any state guidelines considered appropriate by DDA for review of work affecting historically or architecturally significant structures.
Sample 1
Standards of Review. A. Summary Judgment
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Standards of Review

  • STANDARDS OF DISCIPLINE 18.1 In order of severity, the usual types of disciplinary action are as follows: - oral reprimand, - written reprimand - suspension - demotion - termination of employment 18.2 When an employee is required to attend a meeting, the purpose of which is to investigate a disciplinary matter concerning the employee or to render a disciplinary decision concerning the employee, the employee is entitled to have, upon request, a representative of the Association attend the meeting. Where practicable, the employee shall receive a minimum of two (2) day’s notice of such a meeting and shall be informed of the reason for it. 18.3 When an employee is suspended from duty, demoted or terminated due to a disciplinary infraction, the Council shall notify the employee, in writing, of the reason(s) for the suspension, demotion or termination. The Council shall endeavour to provide this written notification at the time of the suspension, demotion or termination. 18.4 When an employee feels aggrieved by the application of any disciplinary action which was applied, or in the employee’s opinion was applied, to the employee by the Council, the employee may present a grievance in accordance with the Grievance Procedure Article of this Agreement. 18.5 Except in the case of an oral reprimand, the Council shall provide an employee with a written record of any disciplinary action taken by the Council against the employee after the date of signing of this Agreement, and such written record shall include the reason for the disciplinary action. 18.6 The Council agrees not to introduce as evidence in a hearing relating to disciplinary action any document from the file of an employee, the existence of which the employee was not aware at the time of filing or within a reasonable period thereafter. 18.7 The Council agrees not to introduce as evidence in an adjudication hearing any document from the file of an employee where the employee was not aware of its existence: 18.7.1 at the time of requesting the services of an adjudicator or 18.7.2 within a period of five (5) consecutive working days after the Council has been informed that the employee has requested the services of an adjudicator, whichever occurs later. 18.8 Notice of disciplinary action which may have been placed on the Council staff file of an employee following the date of signing of this Agreement shall be removed from the Council staff file of the employee after two (2) years have elapsed since the disciplinary action was taken provided that no further disciplinary action has been recorded during the two (2) year period. This two (2) year period will automatically be extended by the length of any period of leave without pay in excess of three (3) months.

  • Standards of Service In connection with the performance of any Services pursuant to this Agreement: 7.1 Number of Employees Contractor warrants it will provide sufficient employees to complete the Services ordered within the applicable time frames established pursuant to this Agreement. Furthermore, Contractor shall, at its expense, supply all tools, equipment, and other materials necessary to perform the Services contemplated in this Agreement. 7.2 Skill of Employees Contractor warrants that employees shall have sufficient skill, knowledge, and training to perform the Services and that the Services shall be performed in a professional and workmanlike manner.

  • Standard of Review The Parties acknowledge and agree that the standard of review for any avoidance, breach, rejection, termination or other cessation of performance of or changes to any portion of this integrated, non-severable Agreement (as described in Section 22) over which FERC has jurisdiction, whether proposed by Seller, by Buyer, by a non-party of, by FERC acting sua sponte shall be the “public interest” standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v.

  • Standards of Conduct Whenever the Member is required or permitted to make a decision, take or approve an action, or omit to do any of the foregoing, then the Member shall be entitled to consider only such interests and factors, including its own, as it desires, and shall have no duty or obligation to consider any other interests or factors whatsoever. To the extent that the Member has, at law or in equity, duties (including, without limitation, fiduciary duties) to the Company or other person bound by the terms of this Agreement, the Member acting in accordance with the Agreement shall not be liable to the Company or any such other person for its good faith reliance on the provisions of this Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement, to the extent that they restrict the duties of the Member otherwise existing at law or in equity, replace such other duties to the greatest extent permitted under applicable law.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Performance of Reviews The RIRs shall send a request for review to the Operator per email, where they shall specify the areas they request a review for. The Operator must comply with the request by providing the requested information within working days. The review may include an onsite inspection. In this case the RIRs and the Operator must agree on a specific date for the inspection to take place, which may not be later than sixty calendar days from the date of the request.

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • FERPA The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 USC §1232g, applies to education records of individual students held by the Agency. If Grantee has access to personally identifiable education records, Grantee shall not disclose them to anyone and upon completion of the education program and expiration of the Grant, Grantee shall destroy the records. Grantee shall comply with all applicable statutes and rules related to FERPA and education records.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!