Student Ratings Instrument Sample Clauses

Student Ratings Instrument. The Administration shall use a university-wide student rating system. The system, and the procedures and practices for the use of the system, shall be agreed upon by written mutual consent between the Administration and the Chapter. Until such written mutual consent is achieved, the current system, procedures, and practices shall continue unchanged. Faculty members and departments may choose to use additional evaluative tools. The Administration agrees to take the evidence on professional competence provided by such instruments into consideration in tenure and promotion reviews, as one of several sources of evidence of professional competence.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Student Ratings Instrument. The Administration shall use a university-wide student rating system. The system, and the procedures and practices for the use of the system, shall be agreed upon by written mutual consent between the Administration and the Chapter. Until such written mutual consent is achieved, the current system, procedures, and practices shall continue unchanged. Faculty members and departments may choose to use additional evaluative tools. The Administration agrees to take the evidence on professional competence provided by such instruments into consideration in tenure and promotion reviews, as one of several sources of evidence of professional competence. By January 15, 2018, the Administration shall provide the Chapter with a list of three to five (3-5) externally developed student ratings instruments that meet university and technical requirements. No later than March 15, 2018, the Chapter shall select an instrument from the list for implementation. The Chapter’s selection will constitute written mutual consent. Unless otherwise agreed upon by the Administration and the Chapter, the selection connotes acceptance of the vendor’s standard item template. If the Chapter chooses not to select a replacement instrument from the list, the existing system shall continue.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Student Ratings Instrument. The Administration and the Chapter agree to use the procedures and practices of ICES Online, as developed by the WMU ICES Implementation Committee and approved by the WMU ICES Steering Committee. ICES Online is the online version of the student ratings instrument recommended by the Evaluation Study Committee in its report of February 14, 2003, namely, the Instructor and Course Evaluation System (ICES) of the University of Illinois. A Steering Committee will be responsible for policies and procedures for the use of the student ratings instrument. Faculty members and departments may choose to use additional evaluative tools. The Administration agrees to take the evidence on professional competence provided by such instruments into consideration in tenure and promotion reviews.
Sample 1Sample 2
Student Ratings Instrument. Western and the Chapter agree to use the procedures and practices of ICES Online, as developed by the WMU ICES Implementation Committee and approved by the WMU ICES Steering Committee. ICES Online is the online version of the student ratings instrument recommended by the Evaluation Study Committee in its report of February 14, 2003, namely, the Instructor and Course Evaluation System (ICES) of the University of Illinois. A Steering Committee will be responsible for policies and procedures for the use of the student ratings instrument. Faculty members and departments may choose to use additional evaluative tools. Western agrees to take the evidence on professional competence provided by such instruments into consideration in tenure and promotion reviews.
Sample 1
Student Ratings Instrument. Western and the Chapter agree to use the student ratings instrument recommended by the Evaluation Study Committee in its report of February 14, 2003, namely, the Instructor and Course Evaluation System (ICES) of the University of Illinois. A Steering Committee will be responsible for policies and procedures for the use of the student ratings instrument. Faculty members and departments may choose to use additional evaluative tools. Western agrees to take the evidence on professional competence provided by such instruments into consideration in tenure and promotion reviews.
Sample 1

Related to Student Ratings Instrument

  • Moody’s Xxxxx’x Investors Service, Inc. and its successors.

  • Required Ratings The Offered Certificates shall have received Required Ratings of at least [ ] from [ ].

  • Cooperation with Rating Agencies If the ratings assigned to the Offered Notes by the Rating Agencies are conditional on the delivering of documents or the taking of any other actions by the Depositor, the Depositor will deliver those documents and take those actions.

  • Credit Rating With respect to the Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor, its senior unsecured, unsubordinated long-term debt rating, not supported by third party credit enhancement, and if such debt is no longer rated, then the corporate or long-term issuer rating of Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor.

  • Credit Ratings Use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain at all times (a) a credit rating by each of S&P and Xxxxx’x in respect of the Term Facility and (b) a public corporate rating by S&P and a public corporate family rating by Xxxxx’x for the Borrower, in each case with no requirement to maintain any specific minimum rating.

  • Debt Rating The Liquidity Provider has a short-term debt ratings of “P-1” from Xxxxx’x and “F1+” from Fitch.

  • Debt Ratings Prompt notice of any change in its Debt Ratings.

  • Insurance Carrier Rating Coverages provided by Contractor must be underwritten by an insurance company deemed acceptable to the State of Washington’s Office of Risk Management. Insurance coverage shall be provided by companies authorized to do business within the State of Washington and rated A- Class VII or better in the most recently published edition of Best’s Insurance Rating. Enterprise Services reserves the right to reject all or any insurance carrier(s) with an unacceptable financial rating.

  • Ratings No “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” as such term is defined for purposes of Rule 436(g)(2) (i) has imposed (or has informed the Company that it is considering imposing) any condition (financial or otherwise) on the Company’s retaining any rating assigned to the Company or any securities of the Company or (ii) has indicated to the Company that it is considering any of the actions described in Section 7(c)(ii) hereof.

  • Rating Agency Downgrade In the event that BSFP’s long-term unsecured and unsubordinated debt rating is withdrawn or reduced below “AA-” by S&P or its long-term unsecured and unsubordinated debt rating is withdrawn or reduced below “Aa3” by Moody’s (and together with S&P and Fitch, the “Swap Rating Agencies”, and such rating thresholds, “Approved Rating Thresholds”), then within 30 days after such rating withdrawal or downgrade, BSFP shall, subject to the Rating Agency Condition, at its own expense, either (i) cause another entity to replace BSFP as party to this Agreement that meets or exceeds the Approved Rating Thresholds and that is approved by Radian Insurance Inc. and Financial Guaranty Insurance Company (each a “NIMS Insurer” and collectively, the “NIMS Insurers”) (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) on terms substantially similar to this Agreement, (ii) obtain a guaranty of, or a contingent agreement of another person with the Approved Rating Thresholds, to honor, BSFP’s obligations under this Agreement; provided that such other person is approved by the NIMS Insurers, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, (iii) post collateral satisfactory to each Swap Rating Agency and the NIMS Insurers which will be sufficient to restore the immediately prior ratings of the Certificates and any note insured by the NIMS Insurers, or (iv) establish any other arrangement satisfactory to the Swap Rating Agencies and the NIMS Insurers, which will be sufficient to restore the immediately prior ratings of the Certificates and any note insured by the NIMS Insurers. For purposes of this provision, “Rating Agency Condition” means, with respect to any particular proposed act or omission to act hereunder that the party acting or failing to act must consult with any of the Swap Rating Agencies then providing a rating of the Certificates and receive from the Swap Rating Agencies a prior written confirmation that the proposed action or inaction would not cause a downgrade or withdrawal of the then-current rating of the Certificates.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!