Survey Protocol Sample Clauses

Survey Protocol. For the purposes of 7.1, the Parties will develop and agree on a protocol for the priority and timing of Adequate Surveys for the Lands, including proposed Closing Dates, having regard for: (a) HRFN’s priorities; (b) efficiency and economy, including the availability of British Columbia land surveyors; (c) the necessity to clarify the boundaries due to imminent public or private development on adjacent lands; and (d) the requirements under provincial law, including legislated timelines.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Survey Protocol. For the purposes of 7.1, the Parties will develop and agree on a protocol for the priority and timing of Adequate Surveys for the Lands, including proposed Closing Dates, having regard for: (a) PRFN’s priorities, including, as appropriate, the processes, procedures and policies of the Federal Crown relating to additions to reserve; (b) efficiency and economy, including the availability of British Columbia land surveyors and minimizing the number of different Closing Dates; (c) the necessity to clarify the boundaries due to imminent public or private development on adjacent lands; and (d) the requirements under provincial law, including legislated timelines.
Survey Protocol. All “suitable” habitats within an action area (area to be affected by a project) should be surveyed. Surveys in suitable lentic and lotic systems should be conducted as follows: For use by central data repository only: NEW SITE: Y N NUM: _ _ _--- _ _ _ _
Survey Protocol. ODOT agrees to conduct a full ecological investigation, and to prepare an ESR (or equivalent appropriate documentation) in accordance with the ODOT Ecological Manual, to document that these conditions have been met. This documentation will be included in the ODOT project file and discussed in the NEPA document prepared for the project.
Survey Protocol. For the purposes of 7.1, the Parties will, following the finalization of the Lands under Article 6, develop and agree on a protocol for the priority and timing of Adequate Surveys for the Lands, including proposed Closing Dates, having regard for: (a) DRFN’s priorities; (b) efficiency and economy, including the availability of British Columbia land surveyors and minimizing the number of different Closing Dates; (c) the necessity to clarify the boundaries due to imminent public or private development on adjacent lands; (d) the requirements under provincial law, including legislated timelines; and (e) any changes to the protocol to which the Parties may agree from time to time.
Survey Protocol. The current Service endorsed protocol for northern spotted owls. As of this writing, this refers to the USFWS Protocol for Surveying Proposed Management Activities That May Impact Northern Spotted Owls February 2, 2011, revised January 9, 2012.
Survey Protocol. All “suitable” habitats within an action area (area to be affected by a project) should be surveyed. Surveys in suitable lentic and lotic systems should be conducted as follows: DATE: MM DD YYYY DRY TANK: Y START TIME: STOP TIME: SEARCH TIME:MIN OBSERVERS: *SITE NAME: SITE AT: NUM *UTM ZONE: 11 12 13 EASTING NORTHING ELEVATION m
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Survey Protocol

  • Protocol No action to coerce or censor or penalize any negotiation participant shall be made or implied by any other member as a result of participation in the negotiation process.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Signaling protocol 4.1.3.1 SS7 Signaling is AT&T-21STATE’s preferred method for signaling. Where MF signaling is currently used, the Parties agree to use their best efforts to convert to SS7. If SS7 services are provided by AT&T-21STATE, they will be provided in accordance with the provisions of the applicable access tariffs. 4.1.3.2 Where MF signaling is currently used, the Parties agree to interconnect their networks using MF or dual tone MF (DTMF) signaling, subject to availability at the End Office Switch or Tandem Switch at which Interconnection occurs. The Parties acknowledge that the use of MF signaling may not be optimal. AT&T-21STATE will not be responsible for correcting any undesirable characteristics, service problems or performance problems that are associated with MF/SS7 inter-working or the signaling protocol required for Interconnection with CLEC employing MF signaling.

  • Security Protocols Both parties agree to maintain security protocols that meet industry standards in the transfer or transmission of any data, including ensuring that data may only be viewed or accessed by parties legally allowed to do so. Provider shall maintain all data obtained or generated pursuant to the Service Agreement in a secure digital environment and not copy, reproduce, or transmit data obtained pursuant to the Service Agreement, except as necessary to fulfill the purpose of data requests by LEA.

  • Study Population Infants who underwent creation of an enterostomy receiving postoperative care and awaiting enterostomy closure: to be assessed for eligibility: n = 201 to be assigned to the study: n = 106 to be analysed: n = 106 Duration of intervention per patient of the intervention group: minimum 21 days/3 weeksuntil patient's weight >2000g, averaged 6 weeks between enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure Follow-up per patient: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months following enterostomy closure (12- month follow-up only applicable for patients that are recruited early enough to complete this follow-up within the 48 months of overall study duration).

  • Additional Acceptable Uses of Student Data Contractor is prohibited from using Student Data for any secondary use not described in this agreement except: a. for adaptive learning or customized student learning purposes; b. to market an educational application or product to a parent or legal guardian of a student if Contractor did not use Data, shared by or collected per this Contract, to market the educational application or product; c. to use a recommendation engine to recommend to a student i. content that relates to learning or employment, within the third-party contractor's internal application, if the recommendation is not motivated by payment or other consideration from another party; or

  • Contract Database Metadata Elements Title: Xxxxxxx-Xxx Xxxxx Central School District and Xxxxxxx-Xxx Xxxxx Teachers Association (2007)

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • Web Site Information on registration for and use of the E-Verify program can be obtained via the Internet at the Department of Homeland Security Web site: xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/E-Verify.

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 Telepak Networks will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. Telepak Networks must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non-designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, Telepak Networks will be required to provide the results of the Telepak Networks test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop. 2.1.6.2 Once Telepak Networks has isolated a trouble to the BellSouth provided Loop, and had issued a trouble report to BellSouth on the Loop, BellSouth will take the actions necessary to repair the Loop if a trouble actually exists. BellSouth will repair these Loops in the same time frames that BellSouth repairs similarly situated Loops to its End Users. 2.1.6.3 If Telepak Networks reports a trouble on a non-designed or designed Loop and no trouble actually exists, BellSouth will charge Telepak Networks for any dispatching and testing (both inside and outside the CO) required by BellSouth in order to confirm the Loop’s working status. 2.1.6.4 In the event BellSouth must dispatch to the end-user’s location more than once due to incorrect or incomplete information provided by Telepak Networks (e.g., incomplete address, incorrect contact name/number, etc.), BellSouth will xxxx Xxxxxxx Networks for each additional dispatch required to repair the circuit due to the incorrect/incomplete information provided. BellSouth will assess the applicable Trouble Determination rates from BellSouth’s FCC or state tariffs.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!