Tenn. No. 3:14-cv-311) (the “Federal Litigation”); and
Tenn a multi-state antitrust settlement involving both third party payors and consumers that purchased or paid for the brand and generic version of the prescription drug metaxalone; Xxxxxxxx v. Whirlpool Corporation, No. 8:11-cv-01733 (C.D. Cal.), a national product defect case involving class members who experienced or may experience the overheating of an automatic dishwasher control board; In re Trans Union Corp. Privacy Litigation, MDL No. 1350 (N.D. Ill.), perhaps the largest discretionary class action notice campaign involving virtually every adult in the United States and informing them about their rights in the $75 million data breach settlement; and In re Residential Schools Litigation, No. 00-CV- 192059 (Ont. S.C.J.), the largest and most complex class action in Canadian history incorporating a groundbreaking notice program to disparate, remote aboriginal persons qualified to receive benefits in the multi-billion dollar settlement.
Tenn. Sept. 24, 2012) (adjudicating individual damages claims for named plaintiffs after certifying Rule 23(b)(2) class); Satchell v. FedEx Exp., No. C03-2659 SI, 2006 WL 3507913, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2006) (“Defendant does not cite any authority for the proposition that a named plaintiff may not assert additional, non-class claims.”); cf. Williams v. Nat. Sec. Ins. Co., 237 F.R.D. 685, 696 (M.D. Ala. 2006) (approving incentive award of $5,000 each in Rule 23(b)(2) for two named plaintiffs). representation requirements under Rule 23. See generally Fox Decl. ¶¶ 24, 30; Williams Decl. ¶
Tenn. 2003). Some states authorize the filing of a “notice of security interest” (NOSI) to perfect an interest prior to the issuance of the certificate of title. If the title certificate fails to include the lien, perfection ceases. Xxxxxx x. Xxxxx (In re Xxxxx), 491 F.3d 1136 (10th Cir. 2007). A snowmobile has been held not to be a motor vehicle and is a consumer good subject to automatic perfection for a purchase money security interest. In re Xxxxx, 59 U.C.C. Rep.
Tenn. This Agreement shall become binding and enforceable on the date upon which it is fully executed by the parties hereto (Effective Date"), and this Agreement shall continue in force for a term through December 31, 2001.
Tenn. Service under this Agreement shall commence as ofApril 1, 2018, and shall continue in full force and effect until March 31, 2023. Pre-granted abandonment shall apply upon tennination of this Agreement, subject to any right offirst refusal Shipper may have under the Commission's regulations and Transporter's Ta1iff.
Tenn. No. 16-cv-00224) 16-cv-02883 3/7/2016
Tenn. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon the later of: (i) execution by the duly authonzed representatives of each of PG&E and Seller; or (ii) \\'hen PG&E notifies Seller that PG&E can accommodate Seller's Facility in PG&E's proportionate share of the statewide cumulative total of250 MW as specified in ruc Section 399.20( e), and shall remam in effect until the conclusion of the Delivery Term or unless terJ1llnated sooner pursuant to SectIOn 10.3 of this Agreement (the "Term"). All indemnity rights shall survive the telll1ination of this Agreement for twelve (12) months.
Tenn. Code Xxx. § 6-58-104(a)(6) provides:
Tenn. Code Xxx. § 00-000-000. The Technical Secretary may issue an order for correction to the responsible person when provisions of the Act or Rules are violated, and such person may be liable for resulting damages to the State. Id. Rules.
