Text Processing Component Sample Clauses

Text Processing Component. English Xxxxxxxx, X., Xxxxx, B., Xxxxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxxx, M., Xxxxx, X., and Xxxxx, M. 2006. FreeLing 1.3: Syntactic and semantic services in an open-source NLP library. In the Proceedings of LREC. Genoa, Italy. Xxxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxx X., and Xxxxxx, R. 2006. The second release of the RASP system. In the Proceedings of the COLING/ACL interactive presentation sessions. Sydney, Australia. Cer, D., de Marneffe M.-C., Xxxxxxxx X., and Xxxxxxx X. X. 2010. Parsing to Stanford dependencies: Trade-offs between speed and accuracy. In the Proceedings of LREC. Xxxxx, X., Xxxxxxxxx, X., Xxxxxx, J. R., Xxxxx, X., Xxxxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxxx, X., Ahn, X.-X., Xxx, C. V., Xxxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxxxxx, X., and Xxxxxxx, T. 2009. Large-scale syntactic processing: Parsing the web. Final report of the JHU CLSP Workshop, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx University. Xxxxxx, X.X., and Xxxxx, S. 2003. Investigating GIS and smoothing for maximum entropy taggers. In the Proceedings of EACL, pp.91-98. xx Xxxxxxxx, M.-C., XxxXxxxxxx, B., and Xxxxxxx X. X. 2006. Generating Typed Dependency Parses from Phrase Structure Parses. In the Proceedings of LREC. Xxxxxxxx, D. 1994. Does Xxxx-Xxxxx re-estimation help taggers? In the Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pp. 53-58. Xxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxx, X., and Xxxxx, M. 2000. LT TTT - A Flexible Tokenisation Tool. In the Proceedings of LREC. Xxxxxxxx, X., and Xxxxxx, J. 2000. Speech and Language Processing, Xxxxxxxx-Xxxx. Xxxx, T., and Xxxxxx, J. 2006. Unsupervised multilingual sentence boundary detection. Computational Linguistics 32(4):485-525. Xxxxx, X., and Xxxxxxx, X. X. 2003. Accurate Unlexicalized Parsing. In the Proceedings of ACL, pp. 423-430. Xxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxx, X., and Xxxxxx D. 2000. Robust, applied morphological generation. In the Proceedings of INLG. Xxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxx, X., and Xxxxx, D. 2006. Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In the Proceedings of COLING-ACL. Xxxxxxxxx, X., Xxxxx, X., Xxxxxxx, C., and Xxxxxx, Y. 2003. Feature-Rich Part-of-Speech Tagging with a Cyclic Dependency Network. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL, pp. 252-259. French Xxxx, X., Xxxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxxx, P., and Xxxxxx, M. 1998. The XXXXX Xxxxxx Part-of-Speech Tagging Evaluation Task. In the Proceedings of LREC. Granada, Spain. Xxxxxxxx, X., and Xxxxxxx-Xxxxxxx, H. 2008. Training and evaluation of POS taggers on the French multitag corpus. In the Proceedings of LREC. Xxxxx, E. 1995. Transforma...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Text Processing Component

  • Program Components Activities and services delivered under this Program Element align with Foundational Programs and Foundational Capabilities, as defined in Oregon’s Public Health Modernization Manual, (xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx/oha/PH/ABOUT/TASKFORCE/Documents/public_health_modernization_man ual.pdf) as well as with public health accountability outcome and process metrics (if applicable) as follows:

  • Subprocessing 1. The data importer shall not subcontract any of its processing operations performed on behalf of the data exporter under the Clauses without the prior written consent of the data exporter. Where the data importer subcontracts its obligations under the Clauses, with the consent of the data exporter, it shall do so only by way of a written agreement with the subprocessor which imposes the same obligations on the subprocessor as are imposed on the data importer under the Clauses. Where the subprocessor fails to fulfil its data protection obligations under such written agreement the data importer shall remain fully liable to the data exporter for the performance of the subprocessor's obligations under such agreement.

  • Sub-processing 1. The data importer shall not subcontract any of its processing operations performed on behalf of the data exporter under the Clauses without the prior written consent of the data exporter. Where the data importer subcontracts its obligations under the Clauses, with the consent of the data exporter, it shall do so only by way of a written agreement with the sub-processor which imposes the same obligations on the sub-processor as are imposed on the data importer under the Clauses. Where the sub-processor fails to fulfil its data protection obligations under such written agreement the data importer shall remain fully liable to the data exporter for the performance of the sub-processor’s obligations under such agreement.

  • Purchase Order Flip via Ariba Network (AN) The online process allows suppliers to submit invoices via the AN for catalog and non- catalog goods and services. Contractors have the ability to create an invoice directly from their Inbox in their AN account by simply “flipping” the purchase order into an invoice. This option does not require any special software or technical capabilities. For the purposes of this section, the Contractor warrants and represents that it is authorized and empowered to and hereby grants the State and the third-party provider of MFMP the right and license to use, reproduce, transmit, distribute, and publicly display within the system the information outlined above. In addition, the Contractor warrants and represents that it is authorized and empowered to and hereby grants the State and the third-party provider the right and license to reproduce and display within the system the Contractor’s trademarks, system marks, logos, trade dress, or other branding designation that identifies the products made available by the Contractor under the Contract.

  • Computer Equipment Recycling Program If this Contract is for the purchase or lease of computer equipment, then Contractor certifies that it is in compliance with Subchapter Y, Chapter 361 of the Texas Health and Safety Code related to the Computer Equipment Recycling Program and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rules in 30 TAC Chapter 328.

  • Payment Processing Citizens may require any other information from Vendor that Citizens deems necessary to verify any compensation request placed under this Agreement and Vendor agrees that it will provide such information as reasonably requested by Citizens. Payment shall be due net thirty (30) calendar days of Citizens’ actual receipt of a complete and undisputed invoice. Where a submitted invoice is incomplete, such as not containing the information described in this Section, Citizens will return the incomplete invoice to Vendor for correction within thirty (30) calendar days of Citizens’ actual receipt of such invoice. Where Citizens reasonably disputes any part of a complete invoice, such as the amount of the compensation request, Citizens shall pay any undisputed portion of the invoiced amount within (30) calendar days of Citizens’ actual receipt of the complete invoice and will describe the basis for the disputed portion of the invoiced amount. Where Vendor disagrees with Citizens dispute of any invoice, the Parties shall seek to resolve the dispute in accordance with the Dispute Resolution Process further described in this Agreement. In no case shall Citizens be subject to late payment interest charges where Vendor has submitted an incomplete invoice or where Citizens has reasonably disputed an invoice. Where Vendor fails to submit an invoice within twelve (12) calendar months of the Services for which compensation is being requested, Vendor acknowledges and agrees that any payment due for such Services is forfeited by Vendor for its failure to timely submit an invoice.

  • Loop Provisioning Involving Integrated Digital Loop Carriers 2.6.1 Where InterGlobe has requested an Unbundled Loop and BellSouth uses IDLC systems to provide the local service to the End User and BellSouth has a suitable alternate facility available, BellSouth will make such alternative facilities available to InterGlobe. If a suitable alternative facility is not available, then to the extent it is technically feasible, BellSouth will implement one of the following alternative arrangements for InterGlobe (e.g. hairpinning):

  • wire Unbundled ISDN Digital Loops These will be provisioned according to industry standards for 2-Wire Basic Rate ISDN services and will come standard with a test point, OC, and a DLR. NewPhone will be responsible for providing BellSouth with a Service Profile Identifier (SPID) associated with a particular ISDN-capable Loop and customer. With the SPID, BellSouth will be able to adequately test the circuit and ensure that it properly supports ISDN service.

  • -wire Unbundled Digital/DS0 Loop These are designed 4-wire Loops that may be configured as 64kbps, 56kbps, 19kbps, and other sub-rate speeds associated with digital data services and will come standard with a test point, OC, and a DLR.

  • Wire Unbundled DS1 Digital Loop This is a designed 4-wire Loop that is provisioned according to industry standards for DS1 or Primary Rate ISDN services and will come standard with a test point, OC, and a DLR. A DS1 Loop may be provisioned over a variety of loop transmission technologies including copper, HDSL-based technology or fiber optic transport systems. It will include a 4-Wire DS1 Network Interface at the End User’s location.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.