Common use of The Evaluation Committee Clause in Contracts

The Evaluation Committee. The goal of the Evaluation Committee is to identify and validate strengths, to identify Article 6 (continued) areas needing improvement, and to suggest areas for growth. The committee should limit itself to the agreed-upon expectations for conditions of improvement and parameters that the faculty member and department have identified. During the evaluation cycle, the Educational Administrator and the Evaluation Committee members shall make scheduled and announced visits to classes or work areas for observation purposes. The Evaluation Committee will meet with the faculty member in the Pre-Observation and Post- Observation Meetings and sign the final evaluation report. Every effort will be made for evaluation meetings to be scheduled with due consideration of faculty assignments. In the event that a committee member misses a meeting, that committee member will meet with both the Educational Administrator and the evaluation committee chair, within five work days, to fulfill committee obligations. A minority statement may be submitted to the evaluation package prior to the report being finalized and signed. All comments and recommendations will be tied to components relevant to the faculty member’s job description. Personal criticisms, challenges to academic freedom, and identification of goals outside of these parameters are not appropriate.

The Evaluation Committee. The goal of the Evaluation Committee is to identify and validate strengths, to identify Article 6 (continued) areas needing improvement, and to suggest areas for growth. The committee should limit itself to the agreed-upon expectations for conditions of improvement and parameters that the faculty member and department have identified. During the evaluation cycle, the Educational Administrator and the Evaluation Committee Article 6 (continued) members shall make scheduled and announced visits to classes or work areas for observation purposes. The Evaluation Committee will meet with the faculty member in the Pre-Observation and Post- Post-Observation Meetings and sign the final evaluation report. Every effort will be made for evaluation meetings to be scheduled with due consideration of faculty assignments. In the event that a committee member misses a meeting, that committee member will meet with both the Educational Administrator and the evaluation committee chair, within five work working days, to fulfill committee obligations. A minority statement may be submitted to the evaluation package prior to the report being finalized and signed. All comments and recommendations will be tied to components relevant to the faculty member’s job description. Personal criticisms, challenges to academic freedom, and identification of goals outside of these parameters are not appropriate.

The Evaluation Committee. The goal of the Evaluation Committee is to identify and validate strengths, to identify Article 6 (continued) areas needing improvement, and to suggest areas for growth. The committee should limit itself to the agreed-upon expectations for conditions of improvement and parameters that the faculty member and department have identified. During the evaluation cycle, the Article 6 (continued) Educational Administrator and the Evaluation Committee members shall make scheduled and announced visits to classes or work areas for observation purposes. The Evaluation Committee will meet with the faculty member in the Pre-Observation and Post- Observation Meetings and sign the final evaluation report. Every effort will be made for evaluation meetings to be scheduled with due consideration of faculty assignments. In the event that a committee member misses a meeting, that committee member will meet with both the Educational Administrator and the evaluation committee chair, within five work days, to fulfill committee obligations. A minority statement may be submitted to the evaluation package prior to the report being finalized and signed. All comments and recommendations will be tied to components relevant to the faculty member’s job description. Personal criticisms, challenges to academic freedom, and identification of goals outside of these parameters are not appropriate.