Theme 4 Sample Clauses

Theme 4 preferences for risk mitigation/risk allocation This theme focuses on: • the potential options to remove the investment barriers, investment risks; and • the allocation of responsibility between public and private sector. Discussion topics used as guidance for interview: • Discussion on number of investment barriers. For example: storage liability, cross chain default, industrial downtime, international competitiveness. • Discussion on options/preferences to address them, allocation between private/public sector.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Theme 4. Preferences for risk mitigation/risk allocation • Public-private partnerships and government sharing of risks to be consistent with 2050 net zero policy.
Theme 4. Preferences for risk mitigation/risk allocation Not included in the scope of the case study
Theme 4. Digital Preservation (September 2012–February 2013) 9
Theme 4. Digital Preservation (September 2012–February 2013) Monitoring digital preservation policies and practice is an activity that is still relatively new to the cultural heritage field. Therefore the ENUMERATE team has decided, in consultation with a group of specialists that met in The Hague on 5 October 2012 to focus on the development of a small but balanced set of survey questions. The approach will be a combination of desk research, the consultation of a focus group on the topic, and a synthesis of outcomes. The ENUMERATE team has experienced that the need to monitor digital preservation in the domain of cultural heritage is emerging in several places. Realising synergy with other plans and projects will be part of the activities. The main activity, the focus group session, is scheduled in the month of January 2013. Schedule of activities Activity Start date Due date Actor Theme 4 desk research 01/09/2012 30/11/2012 DEN Theme 4 methodology development 15/09/2012 30/11/2012 DEN, Panteia Theme 4 brainstorm session topics 05/10/2012 05/10/2012 DEN, Panteia Theme 4 selecting participants 29/10/2012 16/11/2012 DEN Theme 4 preparation focus group 10/12/2012 04/01/2013 DEN, Panteia Theme 4 focus group - 18/01/2013 DEN, Panteia Theme 4 focus group report 21/01/2013 01/02/2013 Panteia
Theme 4. 9.22 The objections state that: • Insufficient information is provided regarding the costs of the scheme and funding arrangements. • That without further information regarding funding and viability the CPO ought not to be confirmed.
Theme 4. Impact on Staff Workload While identifying ways in which these devices could be implemented in clinical practice, participants in three focus groups also highlighted that this should not increase staff members’ already high workload. Participants stressed the need for automatic real-time analysis of the data collected by the device, to ensure that information can be acted on without additional burden on staff time: Yeah I mean that’s the only way I can think it’d be useful, without that real-time information, we’re gonna have to take the watch and then upload the data and see what’s going on. [Participant 002, nurse] Yeah [if] it’s automatic, and we don’t have to put in a lot more to get the data and to analyse the data, then it will be good, yeah. But if we have to put in a lot more to measuring and analysing the data and doing deductions for ourselves, that means additional work to do. [Participant 009, nurse] Participants also questioned whether additional checklists would accompany the devices, increasing the level of ongoing input required from staff: So does this come with a pack or a checklist or something that you’ve got to fill it out every day during the monitoring, or will you really only attend to it when you, it gives you any signals or something that there are any changes? How is it done, I’m just thinking if it’s something that’s supposed to be monitored every now and then and every day it means additional work, isn’t it, you feel, more boxes to tick. [Participant 009, nurse] Responsibility for ensuring that users are wearing the devices was also discussed, with participants feeling that it would fall to staff to spend additional time monitoring use, therefore taking time away from their other duties: Because it’s going to be more [inaudible] on staff now. Now they are wearing it they are gonna say, oh, gonna spend a couple of minutes encouraging them to put it on or go put it on, so it’s going to take valuable time out of your working day, so, it’s going to be time consuming in a way. [Participant 001, nurse]
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Theme 4. Searching The tests focused on how the platform performs searches, and how users can use and interpret the results of searches. Table 8 - Searching Theme Details Case Study Aspect Feature Version Observation Suggestions for improvement Further Actions Score CS1 Fuzzy search RF69 (old RF68) - The archive facilitates searching by providing fuzzy indexing and stemming BF1 If you use the repository search interface the record appears in the results (in the very first positions), which is logical and expected. Tests indicate that fuzzy indexing / stemming works as intended. No further suggestions. The development team confirmed that the repository is just providing stemming and not fuzzy indexing. It is believe that the searching engine is more than enough without the need of fuzzy indexing. 4 CS1 Search options RF83 - The archive offers a complete range of search options to the user BF1 Test searched under 2 authors’ names and was successful in retrieving posts written by them. When I click on the authors’ names I would like to be taken to a list of the blogs they write, showing context about them and what they write beyond the level of post. The development team confirmed that since a blog may have different authors, the 'Blog' records do not keep the author in the metadata. Only posts and comments have authors (according to WP2 data model) and this is what is shown when you click in an author's name. 3 CS3 Search history RF43 - For each record the archive stores the search keywords used to find them BF3 The user must type one or more keywords and press Search in order to achieve this. The user can display the list of past searches through account settings menu. The displayed list of past searches will be in chronological order. The user will be able to execute any past search using exactly the same search settings as before. No further suggestions. Further consultation between the tester and the development team concluded that there was a misinterpretation of the results due to the unclear description of the feature. The reality is that RF43 should provide the keywords to get to the record. The feature should be tested again within BF5 environment. N/A CS3 Search related external sources RF51 - The archive is able to search within external sources, to provide users with additional sources of information. BF3 Successfully set up 2 external sources in collection CS3 comments, and searched queries in the collections of external sources. Since there are no optio...

Related to Theme 4

  • Workshops During the month of September or October of each year during the term of this Agreement, there shall be held at each University a workshop for Department Chairs at which will be discussed their roles and responsibilities as such. Representatives of the University, at its election, and representatives of the Association, at its election, shall be permitted to participate jointly in such workshop.

  • RE-WEIGHING PRODUCT Deliveries are subject to re- weighing at the point of destination by the Authorized User. If shrinkage occurs which exceeds that normally allowable in the trade, the Authorized User shall have the option to require delivery of the difference in quantity or to reduce the payment accordingly. Such option shall be exercised in writing by the Authorized User.

  • Video This restriction includes, but is not limited to, use of the Beat and/or New Song in television, commercials, film/movies, theatrical works, video games, and in any other form on the Internet which is not expressly permitted herein.

  • Trials The Ship shall run the following test and trials:

  • Workshop The workshop purpose is to provide a training venue for TSS professionals engaged in LVC support and operational and institutional training. Official attendees are active duty military personnel, DOD civilians, and other personnel whose attendance is directed and paid for by a DOD/Army contract. Workshops are held annually in a CONUS location to accommodate all TSS Headquarters, Command, Installation, and supporting agencies involved with development, delivery, and support of the TSS program. The workshops may be attended by as many as 1,500 official participants, and include breakouts for each of the main TSS program areas, technical training with automated applications, briefings, and symposiums. The contractor shall provide evaluation of available venues, and assist with the selection and execute agreements to engage the venue. The contractor shall assist with the planning for the workshop to include preparation of required paperwork for Army conference approval. The contractor shall coordinate and execute the workshop including marketing, registration, logistical support, workshop operation, and After Action Reviews (AARs). There are no personal services associated with this contract.

  • Curriculum 2.U The Academy Trust must provide for the teaching of religious education and a daily act of collective worship at the Academy.

  • Synchronisation Commissioning and Commercial Operation 8.1 The Developer shall provide at least forty (40) days advanced preliminary written notice and at least twenty (20) days advanced final written notice to ESCOM of the date on which it intends to synchronize the Power Project to the Grid System.

  • Curriculum Vitae (a) The Chief Librarian shall maintain a curriculum vita for each Librarian. It is the Librarian’s responsibility to ensure that the curriculum vita on file is kept current. Members shall prepare their curriculum vita with the advice and assistance of their Chief Librarian. Members may revise their curriculum vita at any time.

  • Video Display Terminals ‌ The Employer shall ensure that any new office equipment or facility required for use in conjunction with VDTs shall meet the standards recommended by the Workers' Compensation Board.

  • Clinical Trials The studies, tests and preclinical and clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of, or sponsored by, the Company, or in which the Company has participated, that are described in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, or the results of which are referred to in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, were and, if still pending, are being conducted in all material respects in accordance with protocols, procedures and controls pursuant to, where applicable, accepted professional and scientific standards for products or product candidates comparable to those being developed by the Company and all applicable statutes, rules and regulations of the FDA, the EMEA, Health Canada and other comparable drug and medical device (including diagnostic product) regulatory agencies outside of the United States to which they are subject; the descriptions of the results of such studies, tests and trials contained in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus do not contain any misstatement of a material fact or omit a material fact necessary to make such statements not misleading; the Company has no knowledge of any studies, tests or trials not described in the Disclosure Package and the Prospectus the results of which reasonably call into question in any material respect the results of the studies, tests and trials described in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or Prospectus; and the Company has not received any notices or other correspondence from the FDA, EMEA, Health Canada or any other foreign, state or local governmental body exercising comparable authority or any Institutional Review Board or comparable authority requiring or threatening the termination, suspension or material modification of any studies, tests or preclinical or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of, or sponsored by, the Company or in which the Company has participated, and, to the Company’s knowledge, there are no reasonable grounds for the same. Except as disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, there has not been any violation of law or regulation by the Company in its respective product development efforts, submissions or reports to any regulatory authority that could reasonably be expected to require investigation, corrective action or enforcement action.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.