Third Party Declaratory Judgment or Similar Action Sample Clauses

Third Party Declaratory Judgment or Similar Action. 8.6.1 If a Third Party asserts, in a declaratory judgment action or similar action or claim filed by such Third Party, that any Astellas Patent, Collaboration Patent or CytomX Patent is invalid or unenforceable, then the Party first becoming aware of such action or claim shall promptly give written notice to the other Party. Each Party shall reasonably cooperate with the other Party in any such action.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Third Party Declaratory Judgment or Similar Action. If a Third Party asserts, in a declaratory judgment action or similar action or claim filed by such Third Party, that any INS Patent or ViroPharma Patent is invalid or unenforceable, then the Party first becoming aware of such action or claim shall promptly give written notice to the other Party. With respect to the INS Patents, INS shall have the first right, but not the obligation, through counsel reasonably acceptable to ViroPharma, to defend against such action or claim provided, that control of the defense of the INS Technology Controlled by INS pursuant to the Academic License is subject to the terms of the Academic License. With respect to the ViroPharma Patents, ViroPharma (or its Sublicensees or any of its or their respective Affiliates) shall have the first right, but not the obligation, through counsel reasonably acceptable to INS, to defend against such action or claim. Any costs and expenses with respect to such defense shall be borne by the Party controlling such response or defense. If either Party determines not to assume such defense or fails to assume such defense within forty-five (45) days (or twenty (20) days in the case of an action brought under the Xxxxx-Xxxxxx Act or within the timeframe of any other relevant regulatory or statutory framework that may govern) of learning of the action, the other Party shall, at its sole cost and expense, have the right to defend against such action or claim; provided, however, that such other Party shall obtain the written consent of INS, with respect to the INS Patents, or ViroPharma, with respect to the ViroPharma Patents, prior to ceasing to defend, settling or otherwise compromising any such action or claim, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
Third Party Declaratory Judgment or Similar Action. If a Third Party asserts, in a declaratory judgment action or similar action or claim filed by such Third Party, that any Lupin Patent, Lupin Improvement Patent, Salix Patent, or Joint Patent is invalid or unenforceable, then the Party first becoming aware of such action or claim shall promptly give written notice to the other Party. With respect to the Lupin Patents, the Lupin Improvement Patents, and the Joint Platform Patents, Lupin shall have the first right, but not the obligation, through counsel reasonably acceptable to Salix, to defend against such action or claim. With respect to the Salix Patents and the Joint Patents other than the Joint Platform Patents, Salix (or its Sublicensees or any of its or their respective Affiliates) shall have the first right, but not the obligation, through counsel reasonably acceptable to Lupin, to defend against such action or claim. Any costs and expenses with respect to such defense shall be borne by the Party controlling such response or defense. If either Party determines not to assume such defense or fails to assume such defense within ninety (90) days (or twenty-five (25) days in the case of an action brought under the Xxxxx-Xxxxxx Act or within the timeframe of any other relevant regulatory or statutory framework that may govern) of learning of the action, the other Party shall, at its sole cost and expense, have the right to defend against such action or claim; provided, however, that such other Party shall obtain the written consent of Lupin, with respect to the Lupin Patents, the Lupin Improvement Patents, or the Joint Patents, or Salix, with respect to the Salix Patents or the Joint Patents, prior to ceasing to defend, settling or otherwise compromising any such action or claim, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
Third Party Declaratory Judgment or Similar Action. If a Third Party asserts, in a declaratory judgment action or similar action or claim filed by such Third Party in the Territory, that any Arena Patent or Program Patent is invalid or unenforceable, then the Party first becoming aware of such action or claim shall promptly give written notice to the other Party. With respect to the Arena Patent and Program Patents, the Parties jointly shall engage counsel, which counsel shall be reasonably agreed in good faith by the Parties, to defend against such action or claim. The Parties shall cooperate and consult fully with each other in strategizing, preparing, presenting and conducting any such defense, and the Parties shall seek in good faith to agree on all matters regarding such defense with Eisai having the final decision (regardless of whether or not Eisai is a party to such defense) in case such agreement cannot be reached within an appropriate time period (recognizing that certain decisions with respect to strategizing, preparing, presenting and conducting any such defense may be time sensitive) (subject to the other provisions of this Section 9.5(b)); provided, that Eisai shall fully consider and seek to accommodate Arena’s global intellectual property litigation positions in all such decisions that may impact such global positions (and Eisai shall fully take into account Arena’s interests with respect to the Compounds, the Related Compounds, the Products and other Compound Products and Related Products outside the Territory, including its intellectual property with respect thereto, and the impact outside the Territory of all its final decisions in, and conduct of, such defense, and Eisai shall not unreasonably reject or unreasonably act contrary to Arena’s advice and suggestions with respect thereto). Each Party shall cooperate fully with the other Party with respect to such defense, including being joined as a party defendant or joining the other Party as a party defendant in such defense and providing access to relevant documents and other evidence and making its employees available at reasonable business hours. The Parties shall share all out-of-pocket costs and expenses of such defense, with Eisai paying […***…]%, and Arena paying […***…]%, of such costs and expenses.
Third Party Declaratory Judgment or Similar Action. If a Third Party asserts, in a declaratory judgment action or similar action or claim filed by such Third Party, that any Licensed Patent or Joint Patent is invalid or unenforceable, then the Party first becoming aware of such action or claim shall promptly give written notice to the other Party. [* * *] shall have the first right, but not the obligation, through counsel of its choosing, to defend against such action or claim. Any costs and expenses with respect to such defense by [* * *] shall be borne in the same manner as described in Section 8.6.2 (such costs and expenses to be borne by [* * *] under Section 8.6.2 and Section 8.8); provided that if (i) [* * *] receives notice of a PIV Certification as contemplated by Section 8.6.2, (ii) [* * *], (iii) [* * *] notifies [* * *] that it will prosecute such infringement within the time period specified in Section 8.6.2 and (iv) [* * *] fails to prosecute such infringement, resulting in a declaratory judgment action in respect of such PIV Certification, [* * *] shall be responsible for [* * *]. If [* * *] determines not to assume such defense, [* * *] shall, at its sole cost and expense, have the right to defend against such action or claim.
Third Party Declaratory Judgment or Similar Action. During the Term, if a Third Party asserts, in a declaratory judgment action or similar action or claim filed by such Third Party in the Territory, that any Arena Licensed Patent is invalid or unenforceable, then the Party first becoming aware of such action or claim shall promptly give written notice to the other Party. With respect to the Arena Licensed Patents, Eisai shall have the first right to defend against such action or claim, at its own expense as it reasonably determines appropriate, and Arena shall have the right to be represented in any such action at its own expense by counsel of its choice. If Eisai determines not to defend against such action or claim, it will so notify Arena sufficiently in advance of the deadline for response to allow Arena to respond, and Arena shall have the right to defend against such action or claim, at its own expense as it reasonably determines appropriate, and Eisai shall have the right to be represented in any such action at its own expense by counsel of its choice. Each Party shall cooperate fully with the other Party with 51 respect to such defense, including being joined as a Party defendant or joining the other Party as a Party defendant in such defense and providing access to relevant documents and other evidence and making its employees available at reasonable business hours.
Third Party Declaratory Judgment or Similar Action. If a Third Party asserts, in a declaratory judgment action or similar action or claim filed by such Third Party, that any Licensed Patent or Joint Patent is invalid or unenforceable, then the Party first becoming aware of such action or claim shall promptly give written notice to the other Party. Seres shall, through counsel reasonably acceptable to NHSc, use Diligent Efforts to defend against such action or claim. [***] shall be borne by the [***]. If Seres fails, notwithstanding the foregoing, to assume such defense and [***], NHSc or its Affiliate or sublicensee shall have the right to defend against such action or claim.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Third Party Declaratory Judgment or Similar Action. 8.6.1 If a Third Party asserts, in a declaratory judgment action or similar action or claim filed by such Third Party, that any Santen Patent, Collaboration Patent or Aerie Patent is invalid or unenforceable, then the Party first becoming aware of such action or claim shall promptly give written notice to the other Party. Each Party shall reasonably cooperate with the other Party in any such action.
Third Party Declaratory Judgment or Similar Action. If a Third Party asserts, in a declaratory judgment action or similar action or claim filed by such Third Party, that any Arena Patent or Program Patent is invalid or unenforceable, then the Party first becoming aware of such action or claim shall promptly give written notice to the other Party. With respect to such Arena Patent and Program Patent, Roivant shall engage counsel to defend against such action or claim. The Parties shall consult fully with each other in strategizing, preparing, presenting and conducting any such defense, with Roivant having the final decision (regardless of whether or not Roivant is a party to such defense), which it shall exercise in good faith. Each Party shall cooperate fully with the other Party with respect to such defense, including being joined as a party defendant or joining the other Party as a party defendant in such defense and providing access to relevant documents and other evidence and making its employees available at reasonable business hours. The Parties’ reasonable and documented out-of-pocket costs and expenses of defending any such action or proceeding shall be [***].
Third Party Declaratory Judgment or Similar Action. If a Third Party asserts, in a declaratory judgment action or similar action or claim filed by such Third Party, that any Napo Patent or Salix Patent is invalid or unenforceable, then the Party first becoming aware of such action or claim shall promptly give written notice to the other Party. [*] shall have the first right, but not the obligation, through counsel of its choosing, to defend against such action or claim, provided that if [*] determines not to assume such defense, [*] shall, at its sole cost and expense, have the right but not the obligation to defend against such action or claim; provided, however, that the Party controlling such defense shall obtain the written consent of Napo, with respect to the Napo Patents, or Salix, with respect to the Salix Patents, prior to ceasing to defend, settling or otherwise compromising any such action or claim, such consent not to be * Confidential treatment requested; certain information omitted and filed separately with the SEC. unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. Any costs and expenses with respect to any such defense controlled by [*] shall be [*].
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!