Trial GO / NO GO decision Sample Clauses

Trial GO / NO GO decision. Whilst it is expected that the Power Potential trial will proceed as planned, the Project Steering Committee may deem it necessary to halt the project if it cannot deliver on its core objectives. With respect to DER participation, this decision would focus on two indicators: 1. Sufficient participation, defined as having at least 7 participants signed up to the project 2. Sufficient effect, defined as expecting to see at least 40MVar of Reactive Power availability across the GSPs. The project will also consider business readiness to deliver the Trial and the readiness of the technical solution. From a technical perspective, we track detailed progress of the overall build and test of the DERMS solution and its system integration, and we will use our mailing list to inform our stakeholders, including participating DER, of the technical progress. In October 2018, the project decided to adopt a staged approach to delivery of the DERMS solution – starting with an Interim Solution followed by the DERMS Full Solution. The Interim Solution is sufficient to start Wave 1, but would not support the whole Trial. The DERMS Interim Solution provides a technical demonstration of key aspects of the infrastructure including communication from National Grid’s systems to DERMS to UKPN’s network management system to RTUs and DER controllers and in reverse. DER providers will still use the web interface to enter their availability data. We have committed to inform DER of the project’s progress, including development of the DERMS and as a minimum, reporting on the following development milestones: 1. the build of the individual components of the DERMS Interim Solution is complete by 21st Dec ‘18 2. the ‘Factory/System Acceptance Test’ (FAT/SAT) for the DERMS solution is complete i.e. the system is working in UKPN’s cloud-based test environment by 4th Feb ‘19 3. the ‘Site Integration Test’ (SIT) for the solution is complete i.e. end-to-end system test on a pre-production environment by 25th Mar ‘19 4. the ‘Operational Acceptance Test’ (OAT) for the solution is complete on our live systems 22nd Apr ‘19, before the two-week period for Mandatory Technical Trials beginning 13th May ‘19. Expected dates for these are also included in APPENDIX 1 – Indicative Market Trial Calendar. Similar dates will be published for the DERMS Full Solution. If any of these criteria are not met, the Steering Committee may decide not to start the trial. The project’s formal ‘GO / NO GO’ decision will be ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Trial GO / NO GO decision

  • The Decision If mediation fails, or is not appropriate, and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the Arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the Arbitrator’s decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the Arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case.

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth: (i) The specific reasons for the denial; (ii) The specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Agreement on which the denial is based; (iii) A description of any additional information or material necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary; (iv) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the claimant wishes to submit the claim for review and the time limits applicable to such procedures; and (v) A statement of the claimant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a) following an adverse benefit determination on review.

  • Arbitrator’s Decision Within thirty (30) days after the appointment of the third arbitrator, the three (3) arbitrators shall decide whether the parties will use Landlord’s or Tenant’s submitted Fair Market Rental Value and shall notify Landlord and Tenant of their decision. The decision of the majority the three (3) arbitrators shall be binding on Landlord and Tenant.

  • Independent Decision The Investor is not relying on the Issuer or on any legal or other opinion in the materials reviewed by the Investor with respect to the financial or tax considerations of the Investor relating to its investment in the Shares. The Investor has relied solely on the representations and warranties, covenants and agreements of the Issuer in this Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto) and on its examination and independent investigation in making its decision to acquire the Shares.

  • COURT'S DECISION 33.01 In the event of any articles or portions of this Agreement being held improper or invalid by any Court of Law or Labour Relations Board, such decision shall not invalidate any other portions of this Agreement than those directly specified by such decision to be invalid, improper or otherwise unenforceable.

  • Disagreement on Decision Should the parties disagree as to the meaning of the Board's decision, either party may apply to the Chairperson of the Arbitration Board to reconvene the Board to clarify the decision, which it shall make every effort to do within seven days.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!