Utilization Review and Control Sample Clauses

Utilization Review and Control. In accordance with 42 CFR §438.210(a)(4), the MCO may place appropriate limits on the covered services provided under this Contract on the basis of criteria applied under the Medicaid State Plan, such as medical necessity or for the purpose of utilization control, provided that: 1. MCO services can reasonably be expected to achieve the purpose for which such services are furnished; 2. Services supporting individuals with ongoing or chronic conditions are authorized in a manner that reflects the enrollee’s ongoing need for such services and supports; and 3. Family planning services are provided in a manner that protects and enables the enrollee’s freedom to choose the method of family planning to be used. The MCO must ensure that services are sufficient in amount, duration, or scope to reasonably be expected to achieve the purpose for which the services are furnished. The MCO is prohibited from arbitrarily denying or reducing the amount, duration, or scope of a required service solely because of the diagnosis, type of illness, or condition. Notwithstanding the above, all covered services must be provided in compliance with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008, and with EPSDT requirements, and the respective federal regulations. BMS will have the authority to override any MCO utilization management guideline on a case- by-case basis. The BMS Medical Director shall coordinate with the MCO Medical Director in the event an override is appropriate based on thorough internal review. The MCO must be responsible for payment should a utilization management guideline be overridden.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Utilization Review and Control. The MCO may place appropriate limits on the covered services provided under this Contract on the basis of criteria applied under the State plan, such as medical necessity or for the purpose of utilization control, provided the MCO services can reasonably be expected to achieve the purpose for which such services are furnished. The MCO must ensure that services are sufficient in amount, duration, or scope to reasonably be expected to achieve the purpose for which the services are furnished. The MCO is prohibited from arbitrarily denying or reducing the amount, duration, or scope of a required service solely because of the diagnosis, type of illness, or condition. Notwithstanding the above, all covered services must be provided in compliance with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 and its respective federal regulations. The Department will have the authority to override any MCO utilization management guideline on a case-by-case basis. The BMS Medical Director shall coordinate with the MCO Medical Director in the event an override is appropriate based on thorough internal review. The MCO shall be responsible for payment should a utilization management guideline be overridden.
Utilization Review and Control. The MCO may place appropriate limits on the covered services provided under this Contract on the basis of criteria applied under the Medicaid or BCF State Plans, such as medical necessity or for the purpose of utilization control, provided the MCO services can reasonably be expected to achieve the purpose for which such services are furnished. The MCO must ensure that services are sufficient in amount, duration, or scope to reasonably be expected to achieve the purpose for which the services are furnished. The MCO is prohibited from arbitrarily denying or reducing the amount, duration, or scope of a required service solely because of the diagnosis, type of illness, or condition. Notwithstanding the above, all covered services must be provided in compliance with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008, and with EPSDT requirements and respective federal regulations. The Department will have the authority to override any MCO utilization management guideline on a case-by-case basis. The DHHR Medical Director or BCF designee must coordinate with the MCO Medical Director in the event an override is appropriate based on thorough internal review. The MCO must be responsible for payment should a utilization management guideline be overridden.
Utilization Review and Control. Waive, to the extent allowed by law, any present Department requirements for prior authorization, second opinions, co-payment, or other Medicaid restrictions for the provision of contract services provided by the HMO to enrollees, except as may be provided in Addendum II.
Utilization Review and Control. The Department will waive any current Department fee-for-service requirements for prior authorization, second opinions, or other fee-for-service Medicaid restrictions for the provision of those contract services provided by the MCO to enrollees, except when such requirements are provided by State or Federal law or by the State Plan.
Utilization Review and Control. The DEPARTMENT shall waive, to the extent allowed by law, any current DEPARTMENT requirements for prior authorization, second opinions, copayment, or other Medicaid restrictions for the provision of contract services provided by the MCO to Members.
Utilization Review and Control. The MCO may place appropriate limits on the covered services provided under this Contract on the basis of criteria applied under the State plan, such as medical necessity or for the purpose of utilization control, provided the MCO services can reasonably be expected to achieve the purpose for which such services are furnished. The MCO must ensure that services are sufficient in amount, duration, or scope to reasonably be expected to achieve the purpose for which the services are furnished. The MCO is prohibited from arbitrarily denying or reducing the amount, duration, or scope of a required service solely because of the diagnosis, type of illness, or condition. The Department will have the authority to override any MCO utilization management guideline on a case-by-case basis. .
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Utilization Review and Control

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Subscribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services un- der the plan. Blue Shield has completed documen- tation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required under Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review pro- cess, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • Review and Consultation Employee acknowledges and agrees he (a) has read this Agreement in its entirety prior to executing it, (b) understands the provisions and effects of this Agreement and (c) has consulted with such attorneys, accountants and financial or other advisors as he has deemed appropriate in connection with the execution of this Agreement. Employee understands, acknowledges and agrees that he has not received any advice, counsel or recommendation with respect to this Agreement from Employer’s attorneys.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Quality control system (i) The Contractor shall establish a quality control mechanism to ensure compliance with the provisions of this Agreement (the “Quality Assurance Plan” or “QAP”). (ii) The Contractor shall, within 30 (thirty) days of the Appointed Date, submit to the Authority’s Engineer its Quality Assurance Plan which shall include the following: (a) organisation, duties and responsibilities, procedures, inspections and documentation; (b) quality control mechanism including sampling and testing of Materials, test frequencies, standards, acceptance criteria, testing facilities, reporting, recording and interpretation of test results, approvals, check list for site activities, and proforma for testing and calibration in accordance with the Specifications for Road and Bridge Works issued by MORTH, relevant IRC specifications and Good Industry Practice; and (c) internal quality audit system. The Authority’s Engineer shall convey its approval to the Contractor within a period of 21 (twenty-one) days of receipt of the QAP stating the modifications, if any, required, and the Contractor shall incorporate those in the QAP to the extent required for conforming with the provisions of this Clause 11.2. (iii) The Contractor shall procure all documents, apparatus and instruments, fuel, consumables, water, electricity, labour, Materials, samples, and qualified personnel as are necessary for examining and testing the Project Assets and workmanship in accordance with the Quality Assurance Plan. (iv) The cost of testing of Construction, Materials and workmanship under this Article 11 shall be borne by the Contractor.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Quality Management System Supplier hereby undertakes, warrants and confirms, and will ensue same for its subcontractors, to remain certified in accordance with ISO 9001 standard or equivalent. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the Supplier shall, if so instructed by ISR, provide evidence of such certifications. In any event, Supplier must notify ISR, in writing, in the event said certification is suspended and/or canceled and/or not continued.

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out – 6.1.1 The standards and procedures for evaluating the Employee’s performance; and 6.1.2 The intervals for the evaluation of the Employee’s performance. 6.2 Despite the establishment of agreed intervals for evaluation, the Employer may in addition review the Employee’s performance at any stage while the contract of employment remains in force; 6.3 Personal growth and development needs identified during any performance review discussion must be documented in a Personal Development Plan as well as the actions agreed to and implementation must take place within set time frames; 6.4 The Employee’s performance will be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan (IDP) as described in 6.6 – 6.12 below; 6.5 The Employee will submit quarterly performance reports (SDBIP) and a comprehensive annual performance report at least one week prior to the performance assessment meetings to the Evaluation Panel Chairperson for distribution to the panel members for preparation purposes; 6.6 Assessment of the achievement of results as outlined in the performance plan: 6.6.1 Each KPI or group of KPIs shall be assessed according to the extent to which the specified standards or performance targets have been met and with due regard to ad-hoc tasks that had to be performed under the KPI, and the score of the employer will be given to and explained to the Employee during the assessment interview. 6.6.2 A rating on the five-point scale shall be provided for each KPI or group of KPIs which will then be multiplied by the weighting to calculate the final score; 6.6.3 The Employee will submit his self-evaluation to the Employer prior to the formal assessment; 6.6.4 In the instance where the employee could not perform due to reasons outside the control of the employer and employee, the KPI will not be considered during the evaluation. The employee should provide sufficient evidence in such instances; and 6.6.5 An overall score will be calculated based on the total of the individual scores calculated above.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Quality Assurance/Quality Control Contractor shall establish and maintain a quality assurance/quality control program which shall include procedures for continuous control of all construction and comprehensive inspection and testing of all items of Work, including any Work performed by Subcontractors, so as to ensure complete conformance to the Contract with respect to materials, workmanship, construction, finish, functional performance, and identification. The program established by Contractor shall comply with any quality assurance/quality control requirements incorporated in the Contract.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!