Validation of Integrated Administrative Hearing Officer Decisions Sample Clauses

Validation of Integrated Administrative Hearing Officer Decisions. As part of the Administration and Oversight activities set forth in this MOU and for purposes of validating that Integrated Administrative Hearing Officer decisions are supported by applicable Medicare law, regulations and coverage criteria, all decisions related to Medicare coverage will also be reviewed by the Part C qualified independent contractor (QIC) for a period of at least one (1) and not to exceed two (2) years. The FIDA-IDD Plan will be responsible for automatically forwarding a complete paper copy of the administrative case file to the Part C QIC. OTDA will be responsible for forwarding a complete paper copy of its decision to designated CMS staff, who will compare the OTDA decision with the QIC decision. The primary purpose of this process is for quality assurance and to provide feedback to OTDA to ensure that cases are adjudicated according to Medicare rules. The Part C QIC’s review does not suspend or toll the enrollee’s right to request review from the Medicare Appeals Council. CMS reserves the right to make any necessary adjustments to the appeals process to assure beneficiary access to Medicare items and services. CMS and NYSDOH will evaluate whether and how to continue this quality assurance process in subsequent demonstration years.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Validation of Integrated Administrative Hearing Officer Decisions. As part of the Administration and Oversight activities set forth in this MOU and for purposes of validating that Integrated Administrative Hearing Officer decisions are supported by applicable Medicare law, regulations and coverage criteria, all decisions related to Medicare coverage will be reviewed by the Part C qualified independent contractor (QIC) for a period not to exceed one (1) year. OTDA will be responsible for forwarding a complete paper copy of the administrative case file to the Part C QIC within two (2) days of the Integrated Administrative Hearing Officer’s decision. The primary purpose of the Part C QIC’s review is for quality assurance and to provide feedback to OTDA to ensure that cases are adjudicated according to Medicare rules. The Part C QIC’s review does not suspend or toll the enrollee’s right to request review from the Medicare Appeals Council. CMS reserves the right to make any necessary adjustments to the appeals process to assure beneficiary access to Medicare items and services.
Validation of Integrated Administrative Hearing Officer Decisions. CMS and NYSDOH are establishing a quality oversight process for the integrated appeal system. As part of this quality review process, the FIDA plan shall forward all or a portion of adverse appeal decisions for quality oversight, as will be specified in forthcoming guidance. This quality oversight process will not alter the integrated appeals process set forth in this Section of this contract.

Related to Validation of Integrated Administrative Hearing Officer Decisions

  • Hearing Officer The Hearing Officer shall be jointly selected by the parties within thirty (30) days of the execution of this contract and shall serve for a minimum of one (1) year from the date of selection. At that time the parties may choose to re-appoint the Hearing Officer or select a different Hearing Officer who will also serve for a minimum of one (1) year from date of selection.

  • Claims Administration An employee will be required to comply with any and all rules and regulations and/or limitations established by the carrier or applicable third party administrator and contained in the policy, and employees and their dependents shall look solely to such carrier or third party administration for the adjudication of the payment of any and all benefits claims.

  • Administrative Appeals An administrative appeal is a request for us to reconsider a full or partial denial of payment for covered healthcare services for the following reasons: • the services were excluded from coverage; • we determined that you were not eligible for coverage; • you or your provider did not follow BCBSRI’s requirements; or • a limitation on an otherwise covered benefit exists. You are not required to file a complaint (as described above), before filing an administrative appeal. If you call our Customer Service Department, a Customer Service Representative will try to resolve your concern. If the issue is not resolved to your satisfaction, you may file a verbal or written administrative appeal with our Grievance and Appeals Unit. If you request an administrative appeal, you must do so within one hundred eighty (180) days of receiving a denial of payment for covered healthcare services. The Grievance and Appeals Unit will conduct a thorough review of your administrative appeal and respond within: • thirty (30) calendar days for a prospective review; and • sixty (60) calendar days for a retrospective review. The letter will provide you with information regarding our determination.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Search, Enquiry, Investigation, Examination And Verification a. The Property is sold on an “as is where is basis” subject to all the necessary inspection, search (including but not limited to the status of title), enquiry (including but not limited to the terms of consent to transfer and/or assignment and outstanding charges), investigation, examination and verification of which the Purchaser is already advised to conduct prior to the auction and which the Purchaser warrants to the Assignee has been conducted by the Purchaser’s independent legal advisors at the time of execution of the Memorandum.

  • Minor Administrative Changes System Agency is authorized to provide written approval of mutually agreed upon Minor Administrative Changes to the Project or the Contract that do not increase the fees or term. Upon approval of a Minor Administrative Change, HHSC and Grantee will maintain written notice that the change has been accepted in their Contract files.

  • Contracting Officer The person authorized to administer and make written determinations for the Commonwealth with respect to the Prime Contract. Department – The Department of General Services of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Issuing Office – The department, board, commission or other agency of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that issued the Procurement. Procurement – The Invitation for Bids, Request for Quotes, Request for Proposals or other solicitation and all associated final procurement documentation issued by the Commonwealth to obtain proposals from firms for award of the Prime Contract.

  • Procurement Related Complaints and Administrative Review 49.1 The procedures for making a Procurement-related Complaint are as specified in the TDS.

  • Terms of Reference of the Investigator (a) The purpose of the investigator will be to ascertain facts.

  • Hearing Decision The decision of the Board shall be in writing and shall contain findings of fact and the personnel action approved, if any. The findings may reiterate the language of the pleadings or simply refer to them. The decision of the Board shall be certified to the Superintendent or designee who recommended the personnel action, and he/she shall enforce and follow this decision. A copy of the decision shall be delivered to the appellant or his/her designated representative personally or by registered mail. The decision of the Board shall be final.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!