Quality Assurance Process. Random Case Sampling
a. Below is the number of random sample cases of participation in paid work activities the district will review semi- annually. Refer to the Instruction Guide for the minimum number of cases per district and guidance regarding review requirements.
b. Below is the number of random sample cases of participation in unpaid work activities the district will review semi-annually. Refer to the Instruction Guide for the minimum number of cases per district and guidance regarding review requirements.
c. Below is the number of random sample cases in which a case member is reported as an TA employability code 38 – “Parent needed in the home full time to care for an incapacitated/disabled household member” or TA employability code 48 – “Needed in the home to care for an incapacitated child full time – time limit exemption”. Refer to the Instruction Guide for the minimum number of cases per district and guidance regarding review requirements.
d. Below is the number of random sample cases in which a case member is reported as an employability code 31 – “Parent or caretaker relative of a child under 12 months of age”. Refer to the Instruction Guide for the minimum number of cases per district and guidance regarding review requirements. The district will review district worker or approved provider/vendor collected documentation and data entry of the above listed elements. The district will assess and verify that participation in the reported work activities listed above meet the State approved definition for the activity.
Quality Assurance Process. The maintenance of the academic standards and the management and enhancement of both procedures for quality assurance and control are the collective responsibility of the Partner Institutions. The management bodies are: - Joint Consortium Board (JCB): It has the core responsibility for the quality assurance of the Programme. - External Advisory Board (EAB): It represents the industry stakeholders and internationally recognized experts in the field of cosmetic and dermatological sciences. This board gives non-binding judgements on the Programme structure and contents, and provides advice aimed at ensuring the excellence of the Programme. It is composed of 6 members that meet at least once yearly. It is named by the JCB. - Student - Academic Staff Committee (SASC): It is composed of one person per Partner Institution named by the Programme Coordinator and four elected Students per each intake. It is called upon in two ways: (i) Students use this Committee to bring formally to the attention issues to the management; (ii) the Committee gives a non-binding judgement on the changes proposed by the JCB. Student elections will be overseen by the JCB. SACS meets once a year.
Quality Assurance Process i. QA shall be done according to the IAED standards for Accreditation xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/standards_for_accreditation).
ii. Customer will receive weekly completed QA cases in AQUA based on the National Q timeline established by the parties. This will allow Customer to give appropriate and timely feedback.
iii. Customer must identify an individual to provide case review feedback to dispatchers as provided to them by the National Q reviewer. This individual must be certified by the IAED as an ED-Q. Customer’s contact person (ED-Q) will work directly with the National Q representative. The Customer’s ED-Q will provide any quality improvement feedback and training to Customer’s dispatchers/calltakers based on the feedback they receive from the National Q Reviewer. In other words, the customer ED-Q will work with Customer’s dispatchers/calltakers to help them understand structured protocol utilization, address protocol compliance and performance improvement requirements to become a more effective dispatcher/calltaker.
iv. In order to ensure the integrity of the QA Service, any feedback provided by the Customer’s ED-Q to its dispatchers/calltakers shall not be contrary or inconsistent with the National Q Reviewer’s audit and comments. If the ED-Q does not understand or agree with the National Q review of the call or believes a mistake or miscommunication has occurred the ED-Q should inform the dispatcher/calltaker that they will research the issue and contact the National Q representative so a resolution can be made through the appeals process. Once it has gone through the appeals process the decision is final.
Quality Assurance Process. Seller shall comply with any quality assurance process, inspections and standards applicable to Goods or Services that Buyer will use to comply with any purchase order issued to Buyer by a customer of Buyer, including ISO/TS 16949, ISO 14001, QS-9000 and/or the quality system requirements of any automotive OEM manufacturer issuing such a purchase order to Buyer.
Quality Assurance Process. Random Case Sampling Consistent with New York State’s approved Work Verification Plan (WVP), and in accordance with the requirements established by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, districts must develop a quality assurance plan to ensure that the data reported, from which their work participation rates are derived, are accurate. The plan must include the district’s procedure for monitoring reported scheduled and actual attendance in paid employment and unpaid work activities and the controls in place to ensure that reported exemption statuses resulting in federal exclusions from the work participation rate calculation are accurately made, work eligible individuals are correctly identified, hours of attendance reported are accurate and documented, data entry is accurate and that the district and its providers adhere to the approved work activity definitions and the determination of countable excused absences and holiday reporting within federal limits. Each district must maintain the documentation to verify what is being reported to NYS OTDA. Each district must describe how it will conduct periodic self audits to determine that system entries are consistent with documentation in case files. The district must also explain how it will choose the sample size, select sample cases and establish the review period (no less frequently than semi-annually). The plan must indicate the district will maintain documentation on all pertinent findings produced through its self audit process and that case records for all reviewed cases will be available for State and other auditors in their review of the local work verification system for the standard 6 year period associated with such reviews. The district will sample cases from each month within the (6 month) semi-annual period. The October to March review will be due by May 20th. The April to September review will be due by November 20th. The results of these audits will enable the district to identify policies, processes or cases that may need corrective action. After each self audit is completed, the district must submit a summary of findings to OTDA A&QI at XXX.XX.XxxxXxxxxx@xxxx.xx.xxx for State review including specific information on each of the errors identified. In addition, when monitoring reveals substantial problems, the district must describe the corrective action it will take. The Quality Assurance (QA) plan must include the following elements: • Ensure that documentation of wages...
Quality Assurance Process. Day-to-day monitoring and customer service quality assurance will be the responsibility of the Contractor’s community mediation case manager, in cooperation with the in-court mediator. All returned evaluations and surveys will be read immediately by program managers, with appropriate follow-up action in the event of negative comments. Minor customer service concerns (i.e. isolated incidents of tardiness, illegible or poorly crafted agreements, data gathering errors or omissions) will be addressed collegially by the community mediation case manager or in-court mediator. The purpose of the intervention will be to address the concern and provide appropriate guidance or resources to assure future service excellence. A pattern of such concerns will be referred to management. Serious or repeated customer service issues, or concerns involving the community mediation case manager or in-court mediator, will be handled by the program director. The program director will review all concerns in a timely manner, conduct fact-finding and investigations as warranted, and report remedial recommendations as appropriate. Remedies of a personal nature requiring only admonition or guidance will be handled with due discretion. This might include conversation or correspondence with affected Stanislaus County Mediation Center or Court personnel and customers. The program director will take necessary disciplinary action or address deficiencies in customer services standards or procedures. Credible allegations of personnel misconduct (breaches of the written customer service agreement), or matters raised and considered serious by Court officials, warrant direct and immediate referral to the program director, who will timely investigate such matters and will provide a written report of its findings and recommendations to the Court’s ADR administrator. Such recommendations may include, buy are no limited to, the remedies outlined in Stanislaus County Superior’s Court’s Local Rule 3.12(f)
Quality Assurance Process. ● Earth Advantage will contact the home energy assessor to coordinate a time to meet on-site and do a Quality Assurance Re-score walk through of the home. ● In this visit, Earth Advantage and home energy assessor do not need to do the walk through side by side. Earth Advantage and home energy assessor must not discuss the walk through and calculations until after each has completed data entry and produced a home energy score. ● Discussion between Earth Advantage and home energy assessor is recommended after the independent re-score of the home is completed to identify differences in interpretation or measurement and agree on a preferred approach going forward. ● The house must be in similar condition during both walk throughs and use the same level of data. ● If a blower door test was performed by the home energy assessor during the walk through, then it must be done during the Earth Advantage re-score as well. ● The home energy scores of the home energy assessor and the Earth Advantage must be comparable. ○ If the results for the same home differ by more than one point (on the 10- point scale), another re-score of the home may be required as determined by the QA Provider. ○ If a home energy assessor produces three of five consecutive home energy scores that are not comparable with quality assurance re-scores, re-training is required and must be completed before the home energy assessor can score more homes. Earth Advantage will monitor and identify these QA issues and will report them to the DOE. ● Besides in-field quality assurance described above, US DOE and Earth Advantage will be doing aggregate data review at minimum on a quarterly basis. During the first year of this program, aggregate review will typically occur more frequently. If significant potential errors are discovered, Earth Advantage will communicate any necessary follow-up to the home energy assessor. The home energy assessor may need to re-score the home.
Quality Assurance Process. The formal quality assurance process will comprise of the following four distinct parts:
Quality Assurance Process applicable to Goods or Services that Buyer will use to comply with any purchase order issued to Buyer by a customer of Buyer, including ISO/TS 16949, ISO 14001, QS-9000 and/or the quality system requirements of any automotive OEM manufacturer issuing such a purchase order to Buyer.
Quality Assurance Process. Quality Assurance (QA) involves the systematic review of educational provision to maintain and improve its quality, equity and efficiency. It encompasses school self-evaluation, external evaluation (including inspection), the evaluation of teachers and school leaders, and student assessments. The faculty/HEIs offering the structured doctoral programme has to pass regulations documenting the rights and duties of the doctoral candidates as well as relevant organizational arrangements. The faculty should collect data related to individual progression, net research time, completion rate, dissemination of research results, and career tracking and use this data to continuously assess the quality of the structured doctoral programme. Necessary documentation has to be provided: ● Regulations and Guidelines for structured Ph. D programme; ● Internal regulations about quality management (quality assurance regulation etc.); ● Sample information material about the quality management and its results which the higher education institution regularly uses for its internal and external communication (e.g. link to specific web pages, reports, flyer) ● Quantitative and qualitative statistical data from evaluations, study progression statistics, number of graduates etc. Therefore, the QA Process might include: ● Setting up the basic elements for the internal quality assurance cycle: plan, do, check and act. ● Describing the controls for each element of the quality assurance system as to “what”, “when”, “where”, “who”, and “how” the service, which can be audited, is being implemented. ● Implementing and setting out key features of the internal QA system based on the University's strategic approach to quality management. ● Defining quality & standards framework for academic as well as for administration activities and services. ● Evaluating and assessing academic standards, quality of learning opportunities, research & scholarly activities, community involvement, and effectiveness of quality management. ● Monitoring periodically educational resources, teaching methods, course evaluation, and student’s assessment. ● Conducting quality activities aiming at improvement. ● Using certain parameters to measure the level of compliance with predefined standards, in order to demonstrate, assure and develop quality of education. There are several ways of gathering information to access the QA objectives. The following tools show how internal evaluation can be performed: ● Observations & ...
