WORK VALUE REVIEW Sample Clauses

WORK VALUE REVIEW. D3.1 An employee, or a group of employees, or the union(s) or other employee representatives, may present a case to request the head of service to undertake a classification/work value review of a position or group of positions.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
WORK VALUE REVIEW. The clause dealing with an employee’s or group of employees’ right to request a review of their classification and the work value of their position(s), is being strengthened to ensure that genuine reviews will be undertaken where warranted. The ACT Government is committed to employees being classified appropriately, and is also intending to undertake a larger scale classification review, outside of the Agreement process, to identify categories of classifications that may need to be adjusted based on work value changes.
Sample 1Sample 2
WORK VALUE REVIEW. The proposed work value review of Classification Grades 6, 7, 8, & 9 as prescribed by Clause 5.2.12 of the Nurses and Midwives Heads of Agreement 2010 is to be completed in 2014/2015 and implemented in the financial year 2015/2016 subject to the following: • The work value exercise will be undertaken by Xxxxxx (or equivalent) and will be subject to the following: • A Joint principles document is to be drafted and agreed by the parties – an initial meeting of the parties is to be scheduled by SSMO to occur in January 2015 to finalise the document. • Projected completion date of the work value reviews is to be 30 June 2015. • In the event that the matter remains unresolved or a settlement of the work value review cannot be achieved the parties reserve the right to refer the finalisation of it to the Tasmanian Industrial Commission for arbitration.
Sample 1

Related to WORK VALUE REVIEW

  • Submittal Review 7.10.1 The A/E shall review Submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data, and Samples for conformity with design intent and conformity with the Contract Documents within 14 days of receiving Submittals or in accordance with the approved submittal schedule, or other period as mutually agreed by the A/E and Contractor.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Design Review At appropriate stages of design, documented reviews of the design results shall be planned and conducted. Participants at each Design Review shall include representatives of all functions concerned with the design stage being reviewed, as well as other specialist personnel, as required. Records of such reviews shall be maintained. Any computer software used to perform alternative calculations or verify clearances through the use of scale models or computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) techniques shall be validated before the use of the application, with validation documented in accordance with Section 2.2.15. In addition, at each submittal to IFA for review, Developer shall provide hand calculations that validate any calculations performed by computer software.

  • Quote Review Each Quote received from the Contractor will be reviewed in detail for appropriateness of quantities and tasks selected. Submittals will be reviewed, as well as the Work duration schedule and list of Subcontractor. The County will evaluate the proposed Work units and may compare them with the independent County estimate of the same tasks to determine the reasonableness of approach, including the nature and number of Work units proposed. The County will determine whether the Contractor’s Quote is acceptable.

  • Initial Review The Union may present a written grievance to the DOC Headquarters Labor Relations Office via electronic mail within the twenty-one (21) day period described above. The Agency Head or designee will meet or confer by telephone or electronic conferencing with a Business Representative and/or Shop Xxxxxxx and the grievant within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the grievance, and will respond in writing to the Union within twenty-one (21) days after the meeting.

  • Midterm Review The Recipient shall:

  • ACCEPTANCE TESTS 11.1 If the Contract provides acceptance tests for Goods and/or the result of Services after their completion and/or delivery to the Purchaser, the acceptance shall only be considered as definitive when such tests have demonstrated the compliance of the Goods and/or the result of the Services to the requirements in the Contract.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Acceptance Testing At the time of installation of a LIS trunk group, and at no additional charge, acceptance tests will be performed to ensure that the service is operational and meets the applicable technical parameters.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.