Xxxxxxx Us. For any further clarification of our Terms and Conditions, please write to us at xxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.
Xxxxxxx Us. If you have any questions about these Terms or the Site, please contact us at xxxx@xxxxxxxxxx-xxxx.xxx.
Xxxxxxx Us. A.) v. United Mexican States, Award of 8 July 1927, 4 UNRIAA 219, paras. 23-24; Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx (U.S.A.) v. United Mexican States, Award of 15 October 1928, 4 UNRIAA 389, at 391; Xxxxx
Xxxxxxx Us. 1. If you have any questions about these Terms or if you wish to make any complaint or claim with respect to the Services, please contact us at: xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xx
Xxxxxxx Us. If you have any questions regarding these Terms of Use, you may call us at 000-000-0000, email us via our Contact Us form at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx or you can write to us at 0000 Xxxxx Xx. Xxx 000 Xxxxx, XX 00000.
Xxxxxxx Us. Please direct any questions you may have about the Site or this Agreement to xxxxx@xxx-xxx.xxx with a subject line of “Website Question”. The foregoing contact information may change from time to time by supplementation, amendment, or modification of this Agreement.
Xxxxxxx Us. Questions or comments regarding the Platform should be directed to the Platform Administrator at xxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.
Xxxxxxx Us. A.) v. United Mexican States, Award of 31 March 1926, 4 UNRIAA 41, para. 12, also pointed out that there are different ways of seizing power, differentiating between seizure from the center, or from the periphery, working towards the center. majority of the people’ has been put forward as a possible yardstick.101 But what is the relevance of the distinction between local and general de facto governments in terms of responsibility? The crucial difference is that while the latter are generally accepted as being capable of binding the state and engaging its responsibility, the same cannot be said of the former.102 Accord- ingly, this section explores whether – and to what extent – the conduct of local de facto governments is attributable to the state. Since this phenomenon involves both the exercise of public functions by private persons in the absence of the (de jure) government, as well as the conduct of insurrectional movements, local de facto governments find themselves at the intersection of Articles 9 and 10 ARSIWA.103 But which characteristic is more dominant in the end? The nature of the conduct (governmental functions), or the identity of its authors (insurrectional movement)? For the ILC, the latter appears to have been the decisive factor: the only reason why the Commission mentioned local de facto govern- ments in its 1974 Commentary to then-Draft Article 8 was to specifically exclude them from the scope of the Article, pointing out that they would be addressed instead under what was to become Article 10 XXXXXX.104
Xxxxxxx Us. The parties acknowledge and agree that Apple, and Apple’s subsidiaries, are third party beneficiaries of this XXXX, and that, upon your acceptance of the terms and conditions of this XXXX, Apple will have the right (and will be deemed to have accepted the right) to enforce this XXXX against you as a third party beneficiary thereof.
Xxxxxxx Us. If you have any questions or concerns about this XXXX, please contact us via email at xxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx
