Examples of Authorship Dispute in a sentence
If the matter is taken to the Authorship Dispute Board without the unanimous agreement of the parties, the decision of the Authorship Dispute Board is not binding, but the Board will make a written recommendation that will be provided to all parties of the dispute and can be made public by any of the parties involved.Please refer to Appendix P, “Guidelines for Authorship and Authorship Dispute Resolution” for details on how Duke addresses issues of authorship.
Such communication can clarify roles, spur motivation, and minimize disappointments among the participants.Disputes over authorship are best resolved at the local level by the authors themselves or in consultation with the laboratory chief, chair or head of department(s), or dean, as appropriate.If resolution at the local level cannot be achieved, the matter can be referred to the Authorship Dispute Board in one of two ways.
Prior to a case being heard, and on a regular basis, the Dean should appoint and maintain a standing pool of seven members of an Authorship Dispute Committee .
Informal steps should be taken to resolve the dispute first, but if informal resolution fails, the dispute may be submitted to the Authorship Dispute Panel for formal resolution.
NIH’s IRP researchers adhere to a NIH-wide Policy for Manuscript and Abstract Clearance Procedures at https://oir.nih.gov/sourcebook/submitting-research-publications/publication-abstract-clearance and follow established guidance to ensure transparency in research findings through Processes for Authorship Dispute Resolution at https://oir.nih.gov/sourcebook/ethical-conduct/authorship- guidelines-resources/nih-irp-authorship-conflict-resolution-process if the situation arises.
The appropriate Dean(s) should meet with the parties to mediate the dispute.If the Dean(s) cannot mediate a consent resolution, then any author or party may request an Authorship Dispute Panel.
The Authorship Dispute Panel shall interview the disputing parties and may interview additional persons who are identified as possessing information relevant to the dispute at its sole discretion.
CoR Chair McCloskey stated that after meeting with Associate VPF Valdez about the Data and Authorship Dispute Boards Policy, it became clear that the joint memo sent to Valdez by the chairs of CoR, GC, FWAF is not being interpreted in the manner in which it was written.
If the Dean determines that formal resolution is appropriate, the Dean will appoint an Authorship Dispute Panel to consider and make recommendations in the matter.
If the Dean determines that the allegations do state a claim, and that the parties and/or the University have access to information necessary to evaluate the claim, the Dean will appoint a three-member Authorship Dispute Panel to consider the matter and make recommendations, according to the procedures in section 2.4 below.