No Surprises definition

No Surprises means that the government expects a DHB to:

Split View

AI-Powered Contracts

Draft, Review & Redline at the Speed of AI

Get StartedSchedule a Demo

No Surprises. Assurances. The ITP will include the “No Surprises” assurances set forth in 50 C.F.R. § 17.22(b)(5) and (b)(1)(iii)(B) and articulated in the HCP in Chapter 7.

No Surprises. Rule and Assurances

Examples of No Surprises in a sentence

• The federal No Surprises Act contains various protections relating to surprise medical bills on services performed by Non-Participating Providers and Non-Participating Emergency Facilities.

• In order to assist with plan administrator disclosure obligations under the federal No Surprises Act and Transparency in Coverage Rule, BCBSRI shall make GROUP’s health plan information and notice available on its public website in the required format.

• Rescissions and certain determinations that involve whether we complied with the surprise billing requirements and cost-protections of the No Surprises Act.

• If Medically Necessary covered services, excluding Emergency Services, are not available through one of our In-Network Providers we will approve a referral to an Out-of-Network Provider and issue payment to the Out-of-Network Provider at the Qualifying Paying Amount (QPA) as defined by Section 102 of the federal No Surprises Act.

• However, for out of network emergencies the federal No Surprises Act applies.

More Definitions of No Surprises

No Surprises. Assurances in accordance with Section 8.0 of this IA. The Services will notify the State if any changes in the ESA, regulations adopted by the Services implementing the ESA, other changes in federal law, or court decisions alter or eliminate the “No Surprises” Assurances provided in connection with the HCP, Permits, and this IA.

No Surprises means that the Government expects a board to:

No Surprises. Assurances. Pursuant to the No Surprises Rule at 50 C.F.R. Sections 17.3, 17.22(b)(5) and 17.32(b)(5), provided that MAPPOA, NBC, and the MAPPOA Landowners are properly implementing the MAP HCP, USFWS shall not require these entities to provide additional land, water or other natural resources beyond the level provided for under the MAP HCP, this Agreement and the Permit, with respect to Covered Activities under the Permit without the consent of MAP POA. However, nothing in this Section or in the Assurances Rule shall be interpreted: (1) to restrict the authority of USFWS to take appropriate action under the ESA or applicable regulations to insure that the MAPHCP is properly implemented in accordance with this Agreement; (2) to apply to future Adaptive Management modifications for Conservancy Lands that are deemed necessary or appropriate by the USFWS or CDFG, in consultation with the MAPPOA and the NBC, to respond to monitoring data or new information relevant to the MAPHCP or NBHCP, (3) to apply to future modifications to the MAPHCP as a result of future Giant Garter Snake or Swainson’s Hawk recovery plans, (4) to apply to MAPHCP responses to Changed Circumstances or (4) to apply to changes anticipated to occur as a result of the Urban Development activities anticipated by the Section 10(a)(1)(B) Permit, Section 2081(b) Permit, or as otherwise approved by the USFWS. If USFWS makes a finding of unforeseen circumstances, during the period necessary to determine the nature and location of additional or modified mitigation, all parties whose activities are covered by the MAP permit will avoid contributing to appreciably reducing the likelihood of the survival and recovery of the affected species.

No Surprises means that the community is given advance notification of activities that cause an impact.

No Surprises convention means that agencies should keep Ministers appraised

No Surprises. Assurances. The ITP will include the “No

No Surprises. Assurances of USFWS and CDFG Assurances: (a) “Unforeseen Circumstances”. As provided in 50 C.F.R. 17.3, the term "Unforeseen Circumstances" shall mean changes in circumstances affecting a species or geographic area covered by the RPV NCCP Subarea Plan that could not reasonably have been anticipated by the plan developers, USFWS, and CDFG at the time of the Plan's negotiation and development, and that results in a substantial and adverse change in the status of a Covered Species.