No Surprises definition

No Surprises means that the government expects a DHB to:

No Surprises. Assurances. The ITP will include the “No Surprises” assurances set forth in 50 C.F.R. § 17.22(b)(5) and (b)(1)(iii)(B) and articulated in the HCP in Chapter 7.

No Surprises. Rule and Assurances

Examples of No Surprises in a sentence

• Also, the incidental take statement in a section 7 biological opinion does not provide a "No Surprises assurances" guarantee.

• The purpose of the No Surprises Rule is to provide assurances to non-Federal landowners participating in habitat conservation planning under the ESA that no additional land restrictions or financial compensation will be required for species adequately covered by a properly implemented HCP, in light of unforeseen circumstances, without the consent of the permittee.

• NOTE: The revisions to Your Plan made by this Amendment are based upon the No Surprises Act, a federal law enacted in 2020 and effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2022.

• The purpose of the No Surprises Rule is to provide assurances to non-Federal landowners participating in habitat conservation planning under the Act that no additional land restrictions or financial compensation will be required for species adequately covered by a properly implemented HCP, in light of unforeseen circumstances, without the consent of the permittee.

• Rescissions and certain determinations that involve whether we complied with the surprise billing requirements and cost-protections of the No Surprises Act.

More Definitions of No Surprises

No Surprises means that the Government expects a board to:

No Surprises. Assurances in accordance with Section 8.0 of this IA. The Services will notify the State if any changes in the ESA, regulations adopted by the Services implementing the ESA, other changes in federal law, or court decisions alter or eliminate the “No Surprises” Assurances provided in connection with the HCP, Permits, and this IA.

No Surprises. Assurances. Pursuant to the No Surprises Rule at 50 C.F.R. Sections 17.3, 17.22(b)(5) and 17.32(b)(5), and provided that CITY, SUTTER and TNBC are properly implementing the NBHCP, USFWS shall not require CITY, SUTTER or TNBC to provide additional land, water or other natural resources, or financial compensation or additional restrictions on the use of land, water, or other natural resources beyond the level provided for under the NBHCP, this Agreement and the Permits with respect to Covered Activities under the Permits without the consent of CITY or SUTTER. However, nothing in this Section or in the Assurances Rule shall be interpreted: (1) to restrict the authority of USFWS to take appropriate action under the ESA or applicable regulations to ensure that the NBHCP is properly implemented in accordance with this Agreement; (2) to apply to future Adaptive Management modifications for Mitigation Lands that are deemed necessary or appropriate by the USFWS or CDFG as determined in accordance with Chapter VI of the NBHCP and in consultation with CITY, SUTTER and TNBC, to respond to the results of monitoring in the Plan Area, or to new scientific information relevant to the NBHCP, (3) to apply to future modifications to the NBHCP as a result of future recovery plans as determined in accordance with Chapter VI of the NBHCP, (4) to apply to the NBHCP responses to Changed Circumstances identified in Chapter VI of the NBHCP, or (5) to apply to changes anticipated to occur as a result of the Urban Development activities anticipated by the Section 10(a)(1)(B) Permit, Section 2081(b) Permit, or as otherwise approved by the USFWS, provided that such actions, modifications and changes comply with the limitations and restrictions set forth in Chapter VI of the NBHCP. If USFWS makes a finding of unforeseen circumstances, during the period necessary to determine the nature and location of additional or modified mitigation, CITY, SUTTER and TNBC will avoid contributing to appreciably reducing the likelihood of the survival and recovery of the affected species and ensure that third persons under their control that are carrying out Covered Activities avoid contributing to appreciably reducing the likelihood of the survival and recovery of the affected species.

No Surprises. If some Pi ∈ H obtained y for some tid from consensus[], then V never decides accepted for any party Pj, tid, and any y′ =/ y. Termination of verify[]: Each V and each Pi ∈ H eventually terminate. We now show how to define the contract signing problem within our framework.

No Surprises assurances. Provided that Permittee has complied with its obligations under the HCP, this Agreement, and the Permit, the Service can require Permittee to provide mitigation beyond that provided for in the HCP only under unforeseen circumstances, and only in accordance with the “No Surprises” regulations at 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.22(b)(5), 17.32(b)(5), 222.22(g).

No Surprises. The OSC would expect a principle of “No Surprises” to operate. It would expect to know of any issues at the earliest possible stage. This will xxxxxx a good working relationship between the OSC and local NHS bodies/other health service providers and support a credible scrutiny process. Local NHS bodies / health service providers are requested to provide any consultative documents regarding issues to be reported to the OSC, to the Council’s Democratic Services Team.

No Surprises convention means that agencies should keep Ministers appraised