Examples of Non-Recyclable Materials in a sentence
Where you anticipate the bin will consist of more than 40% Non-Recyclable Materials then you must notify us prior to making a booking so that we can quote you in advance.
Images of common Target Materials, Non- Target Materials and Non-Recyclable Materials should also be provided.
Where Non-Recyclable Materials are found present in a bin, then additional charges will apply, depending on the size, weight, and material in the bin – with a minimum charge of$1595 (inc GST) to apply.
Franchisee is not required to, pick up Recycling Containers containing greater than or equal to ten percent (10%) by weight Non-Recyclable Materials or Organics Containers containing greater than or equal to one percent (1%) by weight Non-Compostable Materials; provided, however, that the allowable percentage of Non-Compostable Material contamination in Organics Containers is subject to change based on the Organics Processing Facility.
Non-Recyclable Materials that take up over 40% of the bin, will be charged differently and at a higher rate.
The regulation, registration and licensing of porters, carriers, truck drivers and other persons carrying goods, or driving vehicles for the conveyance of passengers or goods, within the Port.[ 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35.
Non-Recyclable Material(s); (ii) Recyclable Material that is not Processed into Recovered Material(s); (iii) Recyclable Material Not Practical to Recover; and (iv) Cross Contamination not transferred into the correct Processing stream in accordance with Section 3.0.6.
The District's intent is to estimate percent composition of the incoming material (including Non-Recyclable Materials) so as to help analyze the effectiveness of Respondent performance.
Chart 4 – Average Proportion of Recyclable to Non-Recyclable Materials – 90% 80% 70% 60% 23.4% 21.6% 33.4% 69.2% 50% Non-recyclableRecyclable40% 30% 20% 10% 76.6% 78.4% 66.6% 30.8%2005 2006 2007 2009Comparison with Previous Audits 100% 0%6.
Pike and Kuh, “First- and Second-Generation College Students: A Comparison of their Engagement and Intellectual Development” (2005).