Examples of Procedural Order in a sentence
See, e.g., WesternMassachusetts Electric Company, D.T.E. 99-56 (1999); Dispatch Communications of New England d/b/a Nextel Communications, Inc., D.P.U. 95-59-B/95-80/95-112/96-13, September 2, 1997 Procedural Order.
Meaning of terms used in the Procedural Order: Party is an individual or corporation permitted by the Board to participate fully in the hearing by receiving copies of written evidence, presenting witnesses, cross-examining the witnesses of the other parties, and making submissions on all of the evidence.
From January to May 2012, the Parties exchanged extensive correspondence concerning compliance with Procedural Order No.12.
In accordance with Procedural Order No. 10 (as amended by the Tribunal on 23 June 2010), Claimants filed their Memorial on the Merits (“Memorial”) on 16 September 2010.
On 31 October 2006, the Tribunal issued Procedural Order No. 3, in which it deferred consideration of the Parties’ contentions concerning “unclean hands” and Respondent’s “criminal enterprise” contention to the merits phase.
On 31 May 2011, the Tribunal issued Procedural Order No. 11, in which it: (a) denied Respondent’s request that the proceedings be bifurcated between a liability and a damages phase; (b) reserved its decision on referral under Article 21(5)(b)(i) of the ECT to a later stage of the proceedings, when the evidentiary record would be completed; and (c) ordered the Parties to proceed in accordance with the amended procedural calendar.
On 12 September 2012, the Tribunal issued Procedural Order No. 15 dealing with logistical and procedural issues for the Hearing on the Merits.
The calendar was confirmed in Procedural Order No. 1 on 8 November 2005.
Respondent also requested that the Tribunal modify its Procedural Order No. 13 to lift confidentiality restrictions with respect to documents disclosed in the course of these proceedings, to allow them to be used in “related proceedings” recently commenced against the Russian Federation.
Following an exchange of views by the Parties, the Tribunal ruled on Respondent’s objection in Procedural Order No. 17 dated 2 October 2012.