Reasonableness definition

Reasonableness in the preceding sentence will be judged by references -------- [***] Confidential treatment has been requested for the bracketed portion. The confidential redacted portion has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 16 to ordinary course, arms-length negotiations conducted in good faith. If the parties are unable to reach agreement with respect to ancillary rights in any case, AD and its affiliates will not do a deal with any third party on terms less favorable than the terms offered to RCA or its affiliate without first offering such terms to RCA or its affiliate.
Reasonableness will be subject to “force majeure” events - i.e., any response time that is delayed because of a force majeure event is excluded from the determination whether the prescribed response criteria have been met. Force majeure events are events outside the reasonable control of Englewood, the interpreting service agency, or the interpreter called to respond, such as weather problems, other Acts of God, unanticipated illness or injury of the interpreter while en route to the reporting site, and unanticipated transportation problems (including, without limitation, mechanical failure of the interpreter’s automobile, automobile accidents and roadway obstructions other than routine traffic or congestion).
Reasonableness in this context means . . . the compatibility of the agency’s interpretation with the policy goals . . . or objectives of Congress. To say, however, that the agency’s interpretation must be “compatible” with Congressional purposes is, again, not to say that the agency must identify a single, overarching statutory purpose and strive to interpret the statute in such a way that best promotes that purpose. To state the obvious, “compatibility” is a considerably less exacting standard.71

Examples of Reasonableness in a sentence

  • Reasonableness is a standard that may vary depending on the facts and circumstances.

  • Reasonableness of Northeast Utilities’ 1987 avoided cost estimates.

  • Reasonableness (i.e., does the proposed pricing accurately reflect the Proposer’s effort to meet requirements and objectives?);2.

  • A Clean Claim does not include claims under investigation for fraud and abuse or claims under review for Medical Necessity and Reasonableness, or fees under review for Usual and Customariness, or any other matter that may prevent the charge(s) from being covered expenses in accordance with the terms of this document.

  • Reasonableness of the individual firm-fixed prices and/or hourly rates, and competitiveness of quoted firm-fixed prices with other proposals received; adequacy of the data in support of figures quoted; basis on which prices are quoted.


More Definitions of Reasonableness

Reasonableness means that the solution proposed by the MPCA is appropriate and that there is a rational basis for the MPCA’s proposed action. The need for the rule is described below.
Reasonableness means “that, even where purposefully generated contacts exist, courts must consider a panoply of other factors which bear upon the fairness of subjecting a nonresident to the authority of a foreign tribunal.” Ticketmaster-New York, Inc. v. Alioto, 26 F.3d 201, 209 (1st Cir. 1994) (citation
Reasonableness means that the solution proposed by the MPCA is appropriate. The need for the rule is described below.
Reasonableness also means safeguarding that there is no unreasonable discrimination between the actual and prospective licensees. When making their determination, the Tribunals shall in particular have regard to (i) the availability of other schemes, or the granting of other licences to other similar users in similar circumstances, and (ii) the terms of those schemes or licences (Sec. 129 CDPA; Sec. 167 Copyright Ordinance; Sec. 161 Copyright Act 1994).
Reasonableness means the term shall have been a fair and reasonable one to
Reasonableness shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Uniform Commercial Code, as interpreted by the federal and state courts having jurisdiction over Illinois matters.
Reasonableness in a specific case. In some cases, the Chinese courts may not provide full effectiveness to a jurisdiction clause, which, however, is not due to the consideration of administration of justice or consumer protection, but due to a zealous attempt to protect the jurisdiction of Chinese courts, especially concerning the effectiveness of a jurisdiction clause choosing a foreign court. The law does not expressly require the Chinese courts to decline jurisdiction if the foreign court is chosen in an exclusive jurisdiction clause. Therefore, some Chinese courts may decide to exercise jurisdiction anyway, irrespective of a valid jurisdiction clause choosing a foreign court.39 This may nevertheless benefit Chinese consumers, who would avoid the consequence of having to sue a foreign company abroad. However, other courts may wish to enforce a foreign jurisdiction clause anyway. The uncertainty of the effectiveness of a foreign choice-of-court clause cannot be relied on in protecting Chinese consumers. A Chinese court, on the other hand, cannot decline exercising jurisdiction if it is chosen in a jurisdiction clause, even if it requires a foreign consumer to sue in China and the dispute may have no substantive connections with China.40 It may largely benefit Chinese businesses, which could confidently insert a clause in e-contracts choosing Chinese courts and such clauses would be enforced by Chinese courts given the “reasonable notice” test is satisfied. In general, the Chinese law follows the US model. Although the EU model may provide stronger protection to consumers, the potential cost and burden for businesses are not favoured by Chinese legislators. E-consumers are protected in China through regulating the bargaining power. The newly developed “reasonable notice” test plays a crucial role in determining the success of the Chinese approach. However, there is no consistent guidance provided to apply the test in e-commerce. Since e-commerce changes the communication method, the judges would exercise discretion to determine whether reasonable notice is given on a case-to-case basis. Difficulties usually arise concerning jurisdiction clauses which are included at the end of a lengthy contract which can only be read by scrolling down the bar, which are displayed in small font, in grey colour or against a low contrast background, which are contained in a hyperlink, which are made binding when consumers continue to browse the website, or which are concluded when an icon...