Examples of Singapore Court in a sentence
In each case, the 363 Transaction and the Chapter 11 Plan will be conditional on (among other things) approval of all Court Supervised Arrangements by the requisite majority of Existing Creditors, sanction by the English Court and/or the Singapore Court (as the case may be) and satisfaction of the conditions set out therein.
Any Dispute that is not resolved using the Dispute Resolution procedure set out in Clause 21.17 shall be referred to and finally resolved by arbitration under the Singapore Court of International Arbitration Rules, which are deemed to be incorporated by reference into this clause.
In that case, the Singapore Court of Appeal held that a DAB decision made pursuant to the standard Clause 20.4 of the 1999 FIDIC Red Book was both final and binding on both Parties unless one of the Parties gave notice of its dissatisfaction with the decision.
As mentioned in the Company’s announcement dated 9 April 2019, the Singapore Court granted, inter alia, an order that the Companies’ application for the debt arising from the Business Quick Start Financing be granted priority over all the preferential debts specified in Section 328(1)(a) to (g) of the Companies Act (the “Act”) and all other unsecured debts pursuant to Section 211E(1)(b) of the Act (the “Super Priority Order”).
However, the Singapore Court of Appeals held that the Lost Land Claim may be the subject of a fresh arbitration proceedings before a new arbitral tribunal.
However, the Singapore Court of Appeals held that the NSC Liquidator and Secured Creditors are still required to deliver to Global Steel clean title to the NSC Plant Assets.
The Singapore Court of Appeals likewise awarded litigation costs to the Liquidator but none to the Secured Creditors.
Any conflict, indemnity, dispute (collectively referred to as a dispute) arising out of or in connection with the use of the Website, Radar Option Products and Services, shall be governed by the Singapore Court of Justice for the breach, termination, performance, interpretation or validity of this Agreement.
The extent to which the concept of “dependence” featured in the outcome of the decision in Xxxxx is also uncertain – indeed, the Singapore Court of Appeal in Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx and another v Xx Xxxxx & Hue LLC and another [2014] 3 SLR 761 at [160] analysed White as a case which “treat[ed] the concept of assumption of responsibility as a legal test, in and of itself” [emphasis in original omitted].
On November 27, 2015, the Singapore Court of Appeals further held that the issue of Global Steel’s lost opportunity to make profit cannot be remanded to the Arbitral Tribunal, or to a new Arbitral Tribunal for that matter, to be litigated anew after the setting aside of the Partial Award.