A New Paradigm Sample Clauses

A New Paradigm. In the SBPSxc portion of the Chilcotin study area, since 1869, 25% of the area has had one fire event, 48% of the area has had two fire events, 22% of the area has had three fire events and 5% of the area has had four fire events. Over the same period of time, in the SBPSdc portion of the study area, 48% of the area has had one fire event, 36% of the area has had two fire events, and 8% of the area has had three fire events. (Xxxxxxx et al. pg 87). • Fire sizes as indicated in the previous patch size discussion, are dominated by large and very large fire events, in excess of previously considered maximums and in excess of guidebook recommendations. So much so that Xxxxxxx et al. suggests that without aggregating the Biodiversity target distributions a landscape will result that does not approximate historic fire patterns over the last 150 years (pg 136). • Results indicated that the majority of small patches within TSF maps are residuals (pg 199). • Results of data indicated that small patches of timber should NOT be considered as discrete disturbance patches (pg 115, 124). • Most patches that are < 100 ha in size are fire residuals (pg 128, 132, 138 and 139) • Further relationships may exist between patch size and age-class with the expectation that most small patches are older than the surrounding forest matrix (p119). • Fire results suggest that most small patches are fire remnants within a larger burn matrix, and that most old forest exists within these small remnant islands (pg 79). These results seem to point to a different process than what has been assumed to be at work on the sub-boreal landscape. Start with the same single class even-aged landscape as was imagined in the ‘current perspective’ above. The landscape is subject to several large fires that leave remnant patches (and various levels of single trees) and large areas unburned. The next fire year has several more large fires, which will reduce the area left unburned by the first fire year and may overlap some of the first fire area. Xxxxxxx et al. indicates that in the Chilcotin there were 43 fire years between 2001 and 1869 (pg 42), or approximately one every three years. For the East Fraser study area over the same period of time there were 21 fire years, or approximately one every six years. The next fire year will do the same thing again, further reducing the remaining unburned area, leaving more remnants, and possibly overlapping previously burned area. The process continues for many ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to A New Paradigm

  • Introductory Paragraph—Original THIS GUARANTY (this “Guaranty”), dated as of , 20 , is made by (the “Guarantor”), a organized and existing under the laws of , in favor of Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois (the “Guaranteed Party”), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois. Terms not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the [ ] dated , 20 (as amended, modified or extended from time to time, the “Agreement”), between the Guaranteed Party and , a organized and existing under the laws of (the “Counterparty”). This Guaranty is made by Guarantor in consideration for, and as an inducement for the Guaranteed Party to enter into, the Agreement with the Counterparty. Guarantor, subject to the terms and conditions hereof, hereby unconditionally, irrevocably and absolutely guarantees to the Guaranteed Party the full and prompt payment and performance when due, subject to any applicable grace period, of all payment obligations of the Counterparty to the Guaranteed Party arising out of the Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Guarantor further agrees as follows:

  • Additional Guarantors The Company shall cause each of its subsidiaries formed or acquired on or subsequent to the date hereof to become a Guarantor for all purposes of this Guarantee by executing and delivering an Assumption Agreement in the form of Annex 1 hereto.

  • New Partners No person shall be admitted as a Partner of the Partnership except with the consent of all the Partners who shall determine the terms and conditions upon which such admission is to be effective.

  • Additional Partners (a) Effective on the first day of any month (or on such other date as shall be determined by the General Partner in its sole discretion), the General Partner shall have the right to admit one or more additional or substitute persons into the Partnership as Limited Partners or Special Partners. Each such person shall make the representations and certifications with respect to itself set forth in Section 3.6 and Section 3.7. The General Partner shall determine and negotiate with the additional Partner (which term shall include, without limitation, any substitute Partner) all terms of such additional Partner’s participation in the Partnership, including the additional Partner’s initial GP-Related Capital Contribution, Capital Commitment-Related Capital Contribution, GP-Related Profit Sharing Percentage and Capital Commitment Profit Sharing Percentage. Each additional Partner shall have such voting rights as may be determined by the General Partner from time to time unless, upon the admission to the Partnership of any Special Partner, the General Partner shall designate that such Special Partner shall not have such voting rights (any such Special Partner being called a “Nonvoting Special Partner”). Any additional Partner shall, as a condition to becoming a Partner, agree to become a party to, and be bound by the terms and conditions of, the Trust Agreement. If Blackstone or another or subsequent holder of an Investor Note approved by the General Partner for purposes of this Section 6.1(a) shall foreclose upon a Limited Partner’s Investor Note issued to finance such Limited Partner’s purchase of his or her Capital Commitment Interests, Blackstone or such other or subsequent holder shall succeed to such Limited Partner’s Capital Commitment Interests and shall be deemed to have become a Limited Partner to such extent. Any additional Partner may have a GP-Related Partner Interest or a Capital Commitment Partner Interest, without having the other such interest.

  • Incorporation of Preamble and Recitals The Preamble and Recitals of this Agreement are incorporated into the terms and conditions of this Agreement and made a part thereof.

  • RECITALS WHEREAS the Lessor is the registered owner of the Vehicle, WHEREAS, the Lessor is desirous of leasing the Vehicle to the Lessee on such terms as are set out in this Vehicle Lease Agreement (the Agreement”) and the Lessee is desirous of leasing the Vehicle from the Lessor on said terms, WHEREAS, this Agreement is a lease-only and Lessee will have no right, title, or interest in or to the Vehicle except for the use of the Vehicle as described in this Agreement, WHEREAS, this Agreement shall be treated as a true lease for federal and applicable state income tax purposes with Lessor having all benefits of ownership of the Vehicle, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows: 2.

  • Objection Right for New Sub-processors Client may reasonably object to Data Processor’s use of a new Sub-processor for reasons related to the GDPR by notifying Data Processor promptly in writing within three (3) business days after receipt of Data Processor’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.2 and such written objection shall include the reasons related to the GDPR for objecting to Data Processor’s use of such new Sub-processor. Failure to object to such new Sub-processor in writing within three (3) business days following Data Processor’s notice shall be deemed as acceptance of the new Sub-Processor. In the event Client reasonably objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentences, Data Processor will use reasonable efforts to make available to Client a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Client’s use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening the Client. If Data Processor is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Client may, as a sole remedy, terminate the applicable Agreement and this DPA with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Data Processor without the use of the objected- to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Data Processor provided that all amounts due under the Agreement before the termination date with respect to the Processing at issue shall be duly paid to Data Processor. Until a decision is made regarding the new Sub-processor, Data Processor may temporarily suspend the Processing of the affected Personal Data. Client will have no further claims against Data Processor due to the termination of the Agreement (including, without limitation, requesting refunds) and/or the DPA in the situation described in this paragraph.

  • Creation of New Positions 3.33 Staff Reductions - Transfers (may impact Section C.?)

  • Incorporation of Recitals The recitals hereto are incorporated herein as part of this Agreement.

  • PREAMBLE The parties agree that this article constitutes the method and procedure for a final and conclusive settlement of any dispute (hereinafter referred to as "the grievance") respecting the interpretation, application, operation or alleged violation of this Collective Agreement, including a question as to whether a matter is arbitrable.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.