Access and Distribution. Subscriber (a) shall not provide the Public Use Information accessed by Subscriber through NMLS B2B ACCESS℠ to any person or entity other than End Users, and (b) shall limit the use and dissemination of the Public Use Information accessed by Subscriber through NMLS B2B ACCESS℠ solely to use(s) set forth in Section 3(ii). Subscriber shall not duplicate, download, publish, publicly display, modify or otherwise distribute the Public Use Information accessed through NMLS B2B ACCESS℠ for any purpose other than as expressly permitted by this Agreement. Subscriber shall not make any of the Public Use Information accessed through NMLS B2B ACCESS℠ available to the general public except pursuant to the requirements and limitations of Section 4 (“Use Limitations”). Subscriber shall not (a) reproduce, retransmit, republish, distribute or otherwise transfer for commercial purposes any Public Use Information that Subscriber accessed through NMLS B2B ACCESS℠, except to End Users. Subscriber shall not make Public Use Information accessed through NMLS B2B ACCESS℠ available in bulk format no matter the recipient.
Access and Distribution. Are there differences in levels of access to benefits and services across groups? Are there administrative requirements that result in disparities in ability to complete applications or meet eligibility criteria?
Access and Distribution. The End User may only use the Corpus after this License has been signed and returned to the Licensor. The End User must return the signed and dated License by email, in PDF format to the Licensor at the following address: xxxx@xxxxxxxx.xx. The Corpus is accessible online from the TASS website. The End User shall not, without prior authorization of Licensor, transfer in any way, permanently or temporarily, distribute or broadcast all or part of the Corpus to third parties.
Access and Distribution. The consequences of an information flood (Gleick, 2011) were already palpable well before our time. In the mid-18th century, for instance, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx (1713-1784) announces an information explosion in the L’Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des Sciences, des Arts et des Métiers (1751-1752): As long as the centuries continue to unfold, the number of books will grow continually, and one can predict that a time will come when it will be almost as difficult to learn anything from books as from the direct study of the whole universe. It will be almost as convenient to search for some bit of truth concealed in nature as it will be to find it hidden away in an immense multitude of bound volumes.253 (Xxxxxxx & d'Alembert, 1755/2002) 253 The original text in French is available via xxxx://xxxxxxxx00.xxxxxxxx.xxx/cgi-bin/philologic/xxxxxxxxx.xx?c.4:0000.xxxxxxxxxxxx0000: “Tandis que les siècles s'écoulent, xx xxxxx des ouvrages s'accroît sans cesse, & l'on prévoit un moment où il serait presqu'aussi With the coincidence of technological and theoretical progress in the mid-twentieth century Xxxxxxx’x prediction is generously surpassed and a transition from a Gutenberg Galaxy to a Global Village is effectuated (XxXxxxx, 1962). Within this context of global connectedness, the issue of information overload grows into an eminent factor which the integrated field of Library and Information Sciences [LIS] addresses by enquiring the encounters between a human brain – with all its inherent limits with regard to attention and memory – and a multitude of information: […] in an information-rich world, the wealth of information means a dearth of something else: a scarcity of whatever it is that information consumes. What information consumes is rather obvious: it consumes the attention of its recipients. Hence a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention and a need to allocate that attention efficiently among the overabundance of information sources that might consume it. (Xxxxx, 1971, pp. 40–41) Information overload is an essential concern today to information managers and architects. Addressing the phenomenon generally involves three interrelated fields: 1/ trying to structure information from the supply-side; 2/ attempting to understand the concerns and interests of the information-user; and 3/ constructing architectures and systems to negotiate between the former two domains, between information opportunity and overload (Xxxxxx, 1981)254. Next to this challen...
