We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Advisory Phase Sample Clauses

Advisory PhaseThe Advisory Phase shall only be implemented after concerns or questions of performance have been properly documented on the Recommendation to Advisory Form, submitted to and approved by the Advisory Team. 3.06.1 The practitioner may submit evidence to the Advisory Team and/or appear before the Team to present information. 3.06.2 After reviewing the evidence, the Advisory Team shall make the final decision. a. If the recommendation is not supported, the practitioner shall be deemed to have met standards satisfactorily and shall return to the Professional Practice cycle in accordance with section 3.04.6. The End of Year Summary form shall be completed by an administrator on the PGT. b. If the Advisory Team affirms the recommendation for the practitioner to participate in the Advisory Phase, an Advisor shall be assigned to the practitioner to implement the following process: i. The Advisor shall assume the role previously held by the Facilitator with the additional responsibility of co-creating an improvement plan with the practitioner and a timeline for implementation. ii. The Advisor and the Practitioner shall meet an average of two hours per week to implement the improvement plan. iii. The Advisor and the Practitioner shall meet with the Advisory Team at least every 25 working days to provide updates on evidence of progress. iv. The Practitioner shall have the right to be represented by SJTA staff in any meeting of the Advisory Team that the practitioner is entitled to attend and shall be given reasonable opportunity to present his/her view concerning any report being made. v. During the Advisory Phase, if the site Administrator has a concern while the practitioner is working with the Advisor, the administrator shall call a meeting with the practitioner and the Advisor together to inform them of concerns. After convening such meeting, the site Administrator may choose to submit evidence to the Advisory Team during the Advisory Phase. vi. At the conclusion of 80 working days of Advisory, the Advisory Team shall determine that: a). The practitioner meets standards in all areas and shall return to the Professional Practice cycle. The End of Year Summary shall be completed in accordance with section
Advisory PhaseThe Advisory Phase shall only be implemented after concerns or questions of performance have been properly documented on the Recommendation to Advisory Form, submitted to and approved by the Advisory Team. 3.06.1 The practitioner may submit evidence to the Advisory Team and/or appear before the Team to present information. a. If the practitioner is in agreement with the Recommendation and/or wants the additional support, the practitioner may submit a brief statement stating they want to enter into Advisory and would like to receive additional support. This may occur no earlier than the December Advisory Window. 3.06.2 After reviewing the evidence, the Advisory Team shall make the final decision.

Related to Advisory Phase

  • Construction Phase Services 3.1.1 – Basic Construction Services

  • Development Phase contractual phase initiated with the approval of ANP for the Development Plan and which is extended during the Production Phase while investments in xxxxx, equipment, and facilities for the Production of Oil and Gas according to the Best Practices of the Oil Industry are required.

  • Development Fee A fee for the packaging of a Property or Mortgage, including the negotiation and approval of plans, and any assistance in obtaining zoning and necessary variances and financing for a specific Property, either initially or at a later date.

  • Design Development Phase 1.3.1 Based on the approved Schematic Design Documents, model(s) and any adjustments to the Program of Requirements, BIM Execution Plan or Amount Available for the Construction Contract authorized by the Owner, the Architect/Engineer shall prepare, for approval by the Owner and review by the Construction Manager, Design Development Documents derived from the model(s) in accordance with Owner’s written requirements to further define and finalize the size and character of the Project in accordance with the BIM Execution Plan, “Facility Design Guidelines” and any additional requirements set forth in Article 15. The Architect/Engineer shall review the Design Development documents as they are being modeled at intervals appropriate to the progress of the Project with the Owner and Construction Manager at the Project site or other location specified by Owner in the State of Texas. The Architect/Engineer shall utilize the model(s) to support the review process during Design Development. The Architect/Engineer shall allow the Construction Manager to utilize the information uploaded into Owner’s PMIS to assist the Construction Manager in fulfilling its responsibilities to the Owner. 1.3.2 As a part of Design Development Phase, Architect/Engineer shall accomplish model coordination, aggregation and “clash detection” to remove conflicts in design between systems, structures and components. Architect/Engineer shall utilize Owner’s PMIS to accomplish model coordination and collaborate with Construction Manager in the resolution of critical clashes identified by the Construction Manager. Architect/Engineer shall demonstrate and provide written assurance to Owner that conflicts/collisions between models have been resolved. 1.3.3 The Architect/Engineer shall review the Estimated Construction Cost prepared by the Construction Manager, and shall provide written comments. 1.3.4 Before proceeding into the Construction Document Phase, the Architect/Engineer shall obtain Owner’s written acceptance of the Design Development documents and approval of the mutually established Amount Available for the Construction Contract and schedule. 1.3.5 The Architect/Engineer shall prepare presentation materials including an animation derived from the model(s) as defined in “Facility Design Guidelines” at completion of Design Development and if so requested shall present same to the Board of Regents at a regular meeting where scheduled within the state. 1.3.6 The Architect/Engineer shall prepare preliminary recommended furniture layouts for all spaces where it is deemed important to substantiate the fulfillment of program space requirements, or to coordinate with specific architectural, mechanical and electrical elements. 1.3.7 Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner, if requested, with seeking approval of the Project by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). Such assistance shall include (i) the preparation of a listing of the rooms and square footages in the Project, and (ii) the preparation of project cost information, in accordance with THECB Guidelines. This information shall be provided at the completion of the Design Development Phase when requested by the Owner. The listing of rooms and square footages shall then be updated to reflect any changes occurring during construction and provided to the Owner at Substantial Completion. 1.3.8 At the completion of the Design Development Phase, or such other time as Owner may specify to Architect/Engineer, at Owner’s sole option and discretion, Owner will furnish Architect/Engineer with a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal prepared by Construction Manager based upon the Design Development documents prepared by the Architect/Engineer and approved by the Owner. The Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner and endeavor to further and advocate the Owner’s interests in Owner’s communications with the Construction Manager in an effort to develop a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal acceptable to Owner, in Owner’s sole option and discretion. If the Owner does not accept the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal, the Architect/Engineer shall participate with the Owner and Construction Manager in constructability reviews and shall revise the documents as necessary in order to reach an agreement. If the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal exceeds the Schematic Design Phase Estimated Construction Cost prepared by, or otherwise accepted by the Construction Manager due to an increase in the scope of the Project caused by further development of the design documents by the Architect/Engineer to the extent that such could not be reasonably inferred by the Construction Manager from the Schematic Design documents, and Owner directs Architect/Engineer to revise the documents, the Architect/Engineer shall revise the documents at its own expense so that the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal for constructing the Project shall not exceed the Owner’s Amount Available for the Construction Contract and any previously approved Estimated Construction Costs. If it is determined to be in the Owner’s best interest, instead of requiring the Architect/Engineer to revise the Drawings and Specifications, the Owner reserves the right to accept a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that exceeds the stipulated Amount Available for the Construction Contract. The Architect/Engineer shall analyze the final Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal document, together with its supporting assumptions, clarifications, and contingencies, and shall submit a detailed written analysis of the document to the Owner. Such analysis shall include, without limitation, reference to and explanation of any inaccurate or improper assumptions and clarifications. The A/E will not be required to make revisions to the documents at its own expense under the provisions of this paragraph if the Owner’s rejection of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal is not due to a failure of the A/E to provide the services otherwise required herein. 1.3.9 After the Guaranteed Maximum Price has been accepted, the Architect/Engineer shall incorporate necessary revisions into the Design Development documents. The A/E will not be required to make revisions to the documents at its own expense under the provisions of this paragraph if the revisions are required as the result of inaccurate assumptions and clarifications made in the development of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that are not due to a failure of the A/E to provide the services otherwise required herein.

  • Development Fees To assist the City in meeting expenses resulting from ongoing development, a Developer shall pay development fees for direct capital expenses incurred by the City that it incurs related the property. (“Development Fees”) as follows, as set forth in the Table below. Non-Residential per 1,000 SF $721.00 A. All Development Fees shall be collected at the time of a Developer obtaining a building permit and placed in separate interest-bearing accounts established for direct capital expenses. The City may expend these funds for any purposes designed to meet a discrete need of the property or a discrete need created by the development of the property. B. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained within this Agreement, the Development Fees are being paid in lieu of any other impact fees, development fees or any other similar fees presently existing or adopted by the City at any time hereafter during the term of this Agreement; provided, however, the Owner and/or Developers shall be subject to the payment of any and all present or future permitting fees enacted by the City that are of City-wide application and that relate to processing applications, development permits, building permits, review of plans, or inspections (but no other capital improvement related impact, development or other extractions). C. Except as set forth in this Agreement, nothing herein shall be construed as relieving Owner, Developers, or their successors and assigns, from payment of any such fees or charges as may be assessed by entities other than the City imposes, or is permitted by City to impose, fees or obligations similar in nature to the provisions of this paragraph shall not preclude the City or another governmental authority from imposing a fee of a nature which is not for services or improvements contemplated under this Agreement (i.e., police, fire, and other obligations contemplated under this Agreement or services and improvements contemplated by this Agreement), which are imposed on a consistent basis throughout the area regulated by such governmental authority imposing such obligations. The City or other governing body shall not be precluded by this Agreement from charging fees for delivery of services to citizens or residents (i.e., an EMS response fee or the like), nor from charging fees statutorily authorized in the future (i.e., a real estate transfer fee or the like) which are not collected as a prerequisite to approval of a plat, plan, or construction. The City shall, at Owner’s request, together with Owner, challenge any developer fee, impact fee or other obligation imposed by other governmental authorities to the extent that such fees or obligations are not specifically permitted to be imposed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The Owner and/or Developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with such challenge and may be required to make a deposit of such costs in advance with the City. D. The parties hereto recognize that Jasper County may, now or in the future, impose certain development impact fees upon the Property. The intent hereof is that the Owner shall not be charged in both jurisdictions for the same impact fee (development fee) categories, however, should a dispute arise as to whether Owner/Developer shall pay fees to the County or to the City, the Owner/Developer shall be responsible for settling such dispute with each party. The City shall not offset any development fee contained herein against such fees payable to Jasper County. The same principle shall apply regarding all applicable Development Fee categories hereunder. Owner and City Manager may meet and agree to resolve any issues that may arise in the future regarding the application of these principles to Development Fees due hereunder, and any such future agreement shall not be deemed a material amendment or breach hereof. E. Any Development Fees paid and/or credits for Development Fees with respect to property conveyed, services performed and/or money paid as provided in this Agreement may be assigned by the Owner and/or Developer owning such credits and all such credits shall remain valid until utilized. The Owner and/or Developer shall provide written notice of transfer of such credits to the City. The City shall recognize all such written assignments of such rights and shall credit same against any Development Fees which are owned pursuant to this Agreement. F. The Development Fees set forth in the Fee Chart are based upon 2022 figures. The Development Fee amounts shall be increased annually according to the Adjustment Factor. G. The City, County, or other governmental entity, may establish, solely or in conjunction with each other, a Tax Increment, fee in lieu of tax (FILOT), Multi-County Business Park, or any other special tax district or financing vehicle authorized by applicable provisions of the Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976), as amended, which does not impose additional ad valorem taxes or assessments against the Project. The establishment by the City, County, or other governmental entity, solely or in conjunction with each other, of a special tax district or financing vehicle authorized by applicable provisions of the Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976), as amended, which increases the assessments within the Property solely, shall require the consent of the Owner, Developer, or a Secondary Developer, a Municipal Improvement District may be implemented with the consent of the City for the Project as set forth in this Agreement. H. If the Property contains more wetlands than are necessary to meet Developer’s requirements for open space or for wetlands mitigation on the Property, to the extent that there are excess wetlands available, if Owner, Developer or a Secondary Developer creates a mitigation bank with such excess wetlands and the City has a need for mitigation bank credits in connection with road improvements it is obligated to undertake, then the City may purchase such mitigation bank credits from Owner, Developer, or a Secondary Developer, as applicable. Such purchases shall be at the fair market value of such mitigation bank credits and shall be paid by the City in form of credit to Development Fees, cash, or in such other form as agreed upon by the parties. I. Owner and/or Developer agrees to pay the actual costs and reasonable, actual expenses of the City’s consultants and professionals incurred in negotiating, processing and evaluating the Development Agreement and the PDD Standards. Owner and/or Developer requesting amendments, assignments, estoppel letters or any other documentation as contemplated by this Agreement, shall pay the actual costs and reasonable, actual expenses of the City’s consultant and professionals incurred in negotiating, processing and evaluating such documentation based upon the City’s fee schedule available upon request. City will provide invoices and sufficient documentation of these charges. Owner and/or Developer, as applicable, shall pay such fees within sixty (60) days of the delivery by the City of the invoice(s).

  • Construction Management Fee The Construction Management Fee for the Project shall be either a ☒Lump Sum or ☐Not-To-Exceed Fee of Thirteen Thousand, Six Hundred Thirty-Two Dollars ($13,632.00). NOTE: Allowances will be on a Not-To-Exceed basis. All unused funds will be returned to the School District at the time of construction closeout. Fee will be paid only on cost of work for these items.

  • Information Systems Acquisition Development and Maintenance a. Client Data – Client Data will only be used by State Street for the purposes specified in this Agreement.

  • PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATIONAL IMPROVEMENT A. The Board of Education agrees to pay the actual tuition costs of courses taken by a teacher at accredited colleges or universities up to three courses per two (2) year fiscal periods from July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2010 respectively, except as follows: 1. No teacher may be reimbursed for courses taken during the first year of teaching in Vineland. 2. Teachers taking courses in the second and third years of employment in Vineland will not receive remuneration until tenure has been secured. The remuneration will then be retroactive and will be paid to the teacher in a lump sum within sixty (60) days after the teacher has secured tenure. 3. All courses must be pre-approved by the Superintendent or his designee subject to the following requirements: (a) A teacher must provide official documentation that he/she has obtained a grade of B or better; (b) Reimbursement shall be paid only for courses directly related to teacher’s teaching field which increase the teacher’s content knowledge and are related to the teacher’s current certification, as determined by the Superintendent or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion; no reimbursement shall be paid for courses leading to a post graduate or professional degree in a field other than education or teaching. Further, effective September 1, 2010, all newly hired teachers shall not be eligible for reimbursement until they are tenured, and they shall not be eligible for retroactive reimbursement upon gaining tenure for courses taken prior to being tenured. (c) The maximum total payments to be made by the Board shall not exceed $130,000.00. Courses shall be applied for no earlier than the following dates: Summer Session - April 1 Fall/Winter Session - June 1 Spring Session - October 1 Courses must, as set forth hereinabove in this sub-article 18.A.3, be pre-approved by the Superintendent or his designee, prior to the teacher commencing the course(s); and (d) Teacher taking courses shall sign a contract requiring them to reimburse the Board for all tuition paid for a course if the teacher shall voluntarily leave the employ of the Board within one (1) full school/academic year of completion of said course, except that reimbursement shall not be required when the teacher shall voluntarily leave the employ of the Board due to a significant, documented life change. 4. Tuition reimbursement costs shall be a sum not to exceed the actual cost of college credits charged in an accredited public State college/University of the State of New Jersey. B. When the Superintendent initiates in-service training courses, workshops, conferences and programs designed to improve the quality of instruction, the cooperation of the Vineland Education Association will be solicited. Notwithstanding the above, the initiation of in-service training courses, workshops, conferences and programs shall be determined solely at the discretion of the Board. C. One professional leave day may be granted to a teacher upon request, according to the following guidelines: 1. The professional day may be for attendance at a workshop, seminar or visit to another school for the expressed purpose of self professional improvement for the job. 2. The request shall arrive in the office of the Superintendent of Schools at least ten (10) working days prior to the date requested and shall be reviewed by the immediate supervisor prior to submission. The Board reserves the right to deny a professional leave day before or immediately following a holiday or on a day which by its nature suggests a hardship for providing a substitute. 3. No more than two teachers from any one elementary school or from any one department in the secondary schools may be granted a professional leave for a given day. 4. The teacher may be required to submit a report to the Superintendent of Schools, Assistant Superintendent, supervisor (s), principal and staff regarding the activity of the professional day. 5. Costs incurred by the teacher for the professional day authorized under this Section shall be the teacher’s responsibility. 6. A maximum of 90 professional leave days may be authorized for the school year which shall be apportioned as follows: elementary, 35; grades seven and eight, 20; and high school, 35. D. If the Board initiates a teacher’s attendance at a professional workshop, seminar or visit, the expenses shall be the responsibility of the Board. Further, this day shall not be subtracted from the 90 professional leave days granted to teachers of the Association. E. The Board agrees to pay the full cost of courses taken by secretaries related to skills and knowledge improvement when such courses are required and approved by the Board. F. The Board and the Association agree that it is important to communicate when developing and implementing current and future learning technologies, including but not limited to distance and on-line learning.

  • Project Development a. Collaborate with COUNTY and project clients to identify requirements and develop a project Scope Statement. a. Develop a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) for each project. b. Evaluate Scope Statement to develop a preliminary cost estimate and determinate whether project be vendor bid or be executed under a Job Order Contract (JOC).

  • Construction Phase Fee Contractor’s Construction Phase Fee is the maximum amount payable to Contractor for any cost or profit expectation incurred in the performance of the Work that is not specifically identified as being eligible for reimbursement by Owner elsewhere in this Agreement. References in the UGSC to Contractor’s “overhead” and “profit” mean Contractor’s Construction Phase Fee. The Construction Phase Fee includes, but is not limited to, the following items: 9.1 All profit, profit expectations and costs associated with profit sharing plans such as personnel bonuses, incentives, and rewards; company stock options; or any other like expenses of Contractor.