APEX Review Panel Sample Clauses

APEX Review Panel. 15.11.7.1 The APEX Review Panel shall serve in an advisory capacity to the Superintendent or designee. The Superintendent or designee shall be the final decision-making authority in determining the educator’s final Performance Evaluation Rating. 15.11.7.2 The APEX Review Panel shall be comprised of members who were not directly involved in the evaluation process for the appealing educator. 15.11.7.3 The selected APEX Review Panel members and alternates shall be trained so as to ensure credibility and expertise of the panel members. The panel shall be comprised of three (3) educators selected by the Association and three (3) administrators selected by the district. No more than six (6) panel members shall comprise the panel. 15.11.7.4 The appealing educator shall be given the opportunity to address the review panel and provide evidence to the review panel in person or in writing. The review panel shall review any written information provided by the appealing educator prior to the meeting to render a recommendation. 15.11.7.5 The APEX Review Panel may invite the educator or the educator’s evaluator to present in person or in writing where clarification is necessary; however, the educator and evaluator shall have the right of refusal without prejudice. 15.11.7.6 In order to overturn a rating of ineffective or partially effective, the panel must unanimously find that the rating of ineffective or partially effective was inaccurate. If the review panel is not unanimous, they shall submit the majority opinion and minority opinion to the Superintendent or designee. 15.11.7.7 The educator is permitted to appeal the second consecutive Performance Evaluation Rating of ineffective or partially effective. The educator filing an appeal shall include all grounds for the appeal within a single written document. Any grounds not raised at the time the written appeal is filed shall be deemed waived. 15.11.7.8 The grounds for an appeal shall be limited to the following: - The evaluator did not follow evaluation procedures that adhere to the requirements of statute, rule and Agreement, and that failure had a material impact on the final Performance Evaluation Rating that was assigned (e.g., an observation was never completed or feedback was never shared with the educator); and/or - The data relied upon was inaccurately attributed to the educator (e.g., data included in the evaluation was from students for whom the educator was not responsible).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to APEX Review Panel

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Claims Review Report The IRO shall prepare a Claims Review Report as described in this Appendix for each Claims Review performed. The following information shall be included in the Claims Review Report for each Discovery Sample and Full Sample (if applicable).

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

  • Claims and Review Procedure In the event that any claim for benefits that must initially be submitted in writing to the Board of Directors, is denied (in whole or in part) hereunder, the claimant shall receive from First Charter a notice of denial in writing within 60 days, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for denial, with specific reference to pertinent provisions of this Supplemental Agreement. Any disagreements about such interpretations and construction shall be submitted to an arbitrator subject to the rules and procedures established by the American Arbitration Association. The arbitrator shall be acceptable to both First Charter and the Executive (or Beneficiary); if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator, the disagreement shall be heard by a panel of three arbitrators, with each party to appoint one arbitrator and the third to be chosen by the other two. No member of the Board of Directors shall be liable to any person for any action taken under Article VIII except those actions undertaken with lack of good faith.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Claims Review The IRO shall perform the Claims Review annually to cover each of the five Reporting Periods. The IRO shall perform all components of each Claims Review.

  • Claims and Review Procedures 6.1 For all claims other than Disability benefits:

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!