Assessment of Deficiencies Sample Clauses

Assessment of Deficiencies. Respondents stated all units were designed and built in accordance with the scoping requirements of the 2015 International Building Code [IBC 2015], which incorporates the standards of the 2009 American National Standards [ANSI 2009] for guidance on the technical requirements [i.e., the dimension requirements]. Neither the IBC 2015 nor the ANSI 2009 is one of the safe harbors accepted by HUD.16
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Assessment of Deficiencies. ICRC acknowledges the IBC 2006 is one of the safe harbors accepted by HUD for meeting the accessible design and construction requirements of the FHA, and that it integrates and applies ANSI 2003, which is another one of the safe harbors. HUD issued a Final Review of the IBC 2006, which outlines the way the safe harbors are to be used. The following is an excerpt from this document:
Sample 1
Assessment of Deficiencies. Respondents stated all units were built in accordance with the requirements of the ANSI 2003. ANSI 2003 is a safe harbor accepted by HUD. However, ANSI 2003 is only a safe harbor if it is used in conjunction with the FHA, HUD’s regulations, and the Guidelines. If Respondents followed the ANSI 2003 as a safe harbor in its entirety, then this code will be used to assess compliance with the design and construction accessibility requirements in the FHA and ICRA. But if Respondents did not follow the ANSI 2003 in its entirety, then the FHADM and ANSI 1986 will be used to determine any deficiencies. Following is the assessment of the reported deficiencies, based on the scoping and technical requirements of FHADM and the technical requirements of ANSI 2003:
Sample 1
Assessment of Deficiencies. Respondents stated all units were built in accordance with the requirements of the 2009 International Building Code [IBC 2009], which is not one of the safe harbors accepted by HUD.16 Therefore, the FHADM must be used to assess and determine compliance with the ICRA and FHA.
Sample 1
Assessment of Deficiencies. Respondents stated all units were built in accordance with the scoping requirements of the 2015 International Building Code [IBC 2015], which incorporates the standards of the 2009 American National Standards [ANSI 2009] for guidance on the technical requirements [i.e., the dimension requirements]. Neither the IBC 2015 nor the ANSI 2009 is one of the safe harbors accepted by HUD.15 Therefore, the 15 xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/faq/safeharbors.html (Last visited on September 28, 2018). Manual and the Guidelines, which incorporate ANSI 1986 for some of the technical requirements, must be used to assess and determine compliance with the ICRA and FHA, not IBC 2015 or ANSI 2009. The public areas must meet the requirements of the ADA in addition to those of the FHA, as people other than residents or residents’ visitors will visit or frequent those areas. The common use areas, however, such as the Fitness Center – which is only available to the individual condominium unit owners – dumpsters, recycling containers, and the wall-mounted mailbox units adjacent to the main entrance are governed by the FHA since they are only for use by the residents of Metropolitan and their guests. The ADA will only be referenced in the current report for the public areas, which include leasing office, exterior parking spaces, elevators, and hallways.16 Finally, the requirements of the ADA will be presented as stated in the “2010 American with Disabilities Act Standards: 2004 ADAAG for Titles II and III Facilities” (ADAAG). See 42 U.S.C. 12204, Part 0000, Xxxxxxxx X, xxx 00 X.X.X 00000(x); 28 CFR Part 36, Appendix B. Following is the assessment of Respondents’ proposed retrofits and determination, based on the scoping and technical requirements of the 2010 ADAAG and the Manual:
Sample 1
Assessment of Deficiencies. Respondents stated all units were built in accordance with the scoping requirements of the 2012 International Building Code [IBC 2012], which incorporates the standards of the 2009 American National Standards [ANSI 2009] for guidance on the technical requirements [i.e., the dimension requirements]. Neither the IBC 2012 nor the ANSI 2009 is one of the safe harbors accepted by HUD.15 Therefore, the FHADM, which incorporates ANSI 1986 for some of the technical requirements, must be used to assess and determine compliance with the ICRA and FHA, not IBC 2012 or ANSI 2009. The public areas must meet the requirements of the ADA in addition to those of the FHA, as people other than tenants or tenants’ visitors will visit or frequent those areas. The common use areas, however, such as parking spaces, mailboxes, and dumpsters, are governed by the FHA since they are only for use by the tenants of the subject property. The ADA will only be referenced in the current agreement for the public areas, which include the parking lot, sidewalks, and interior hallways.16 Finally, the requirements of the ADA will be presented as stated in the “2010 American with Disabilities Act Standards: 2004 ADAAG for Titles II and III Facilities” (ADAAG). See 42 U.S.C. 12204, Part 0000, Xxxxxxxx X, xxx 00 X.X.X 00000(x); 28 CFR Part 36, Appendix B. Following is the assessment of the reported deficiencies, based on the scoping and technical requirements of the 2010 ADAAG and the FHADM:
Sample 1

Related to Assessment of Deficiencies

  • Correction of Deficiencies The contractor must correct promptly any work of his/her own or his/her subcontractors found to be defective or not complying with the terms of the contract.

  • Significant deficiencies (1) The Contracting Officer will provide an initial determination to the Contractor, in writing, of any significant deficiencies. The initial determination will describe the deficiency in sufficient detail to allow the Contractor to understand the deficiency.

  • Deficiencies Without limiting or waiving any other remedies available to City, City’s remedies shall include the following in connection with deficiencies in Tenant’s operations:

  • ASSESSMENT REPORT Within 120 days following the general election held on November 2nd 2003, the returning officer of the munici- pality shall forward, in accordance with section 659.3 of the Act respecting elections and referendums in munici- palities (R.S.Q., c. E-2.2), an assessment report to the Chief Electoral Officer and the Minister setting out relevant ways to improve the trial and addressing, in particular, the following points : — the preparations for the election (choice of the new method of voting, communications plan, etc.) ; — the conduct of the advance poll and the poll ; — the cost of using the electronic voting system : – the cost of adapting election procedures ; – non-recurrent costs likely to be amortized ; – a comparison between the actual polling costs and the estimated polling costs using the new methods of voting and the projected cost of holding the general election on November 2nd 2003 using traditional methods ; — the number and duration of incidents during which voting was stopped, if any ; — the advantages and disadvantages of using the new method of voting ; — the results obtained during the addition of the votes and the correspondence between the number of ballot paper cards issued to the deputy returning officers and the number of ballot paper cards returned used and unused ; — the examination of rejected ballot papers, if it has been completed.

  • Assessment and updates 12.1 Various opportunities are provided to keep you up to date with your child’s progress. You will receive two comprehensive written reports each year and arrangements will be made for at least one interview where you can discuss your child’s development with their teacher. In addition, you can always contact the School to arrange a meeting if you have any concerns or wish to receive an update on progress.

  • Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Development of a transportation project must comply with applicable environmental laws. The party named in article 1, Responsible Parties, under AGREEMENT is responsible for the following:

  • Assessment 29) The Secretary of State will notify the appropriate body for assessment purposes about the Academy.

  • Environmental Assessment Buyer shall have the right for a period commencing upon execution of this Agreement by both parties and ending on November 28, 2012, to conduct an environmental assessment of the Assets, at Buyer’s sole risk, liability and expense. Seller shall make available to Buyer, during the environmental assessment period described above, Seller’s historical files regarding prior operations on the Assets, and provide Buyer and its representatives with reasonable access to the Assets to conduct the environmental assessment. Buyer shall provide Seller three (3) days prior written notice of a desired date(s) for such assessment and Seller shall have the right to be present during any assessment and, if any testing is conducted pursuant to Seller’s express prior written consent, Seller may require splitting of all samples. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, Buyer shall not have the right to drill any test, monitor or other xxxxx or to extract samples of any air, soil, water or other substance from the Assets without Seller’s express prior written consent. If Buyer proposes a reasonable request to drill a test well or extract a sample pursuant to a systematic and customary procedure for the assessment of the environmental condition of the Assets and Seller refuses to grant its consent to such a well or sampling, then Buyer shall have the right, for a period of seventy-two (72) hours following notification of Seller’s refusal to consent, to deliver written notice to Seller of Buyer’s election to exclude from this transaction the portion of the Assets affected by such proposed test well or sample, and the Purchase Price shall be adjusted accordingly by the Allocated Value of such portion of the Assets so excluded. Under no circumstances whatsoever shall Seller ever be obligated to grant its consent to any such test xxxxx or sampling proposed by Buyer, and Buyer’s sole and exclusive remedy for any refusal by Seller to grant its consent shall be the limited right contained in the preceding sentence to exclude the affected Assets from the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. If Buyer fails to exercise the right to exclude such Assets by written notice to Seller delivered prior to the expiration of the seventy-two hour period described above, then Buyer shall be conclusively deemed to have waived such right and shall be obligated to purchase the affected Assets without conducting such testing or sampling or any adjustment of the Purchase Price unless otherwise provided in this Agreement.

  • ADJUSTMENT OF COMPLAINTS Standing Committee Can Call in Members for Discussions of Grievances with the Company. (Page 261, 1946 Transcript) It is agreed that the Union Standing Committee may call in any other employee to accompany them in their meetings with Company officials. Exhibit "A"

  • Assessment of Performance The assignment of a teacher to a TLS position will be subject to review by the school district’s administration at least annually. The first review must be completed no later than five (5) work days before the beginning of the transfer process. The review shall include peer feedback on the effectiveness of the teacher’s performance of duty specific to the teacher’s TLS position. A teacher who completes an assignment in a TLS position may apply for assignment to a new TLS position.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.