Assessment of Rodin Sample Clauses

Assessment of Rodin. Rodin is a well developed software environment having different plug-ins (ProB, AtelierB- Provers, Anim-B, UML-B, etc.). It provides a good support for Event-B language. The tool is sufficiently well documented and has an intuitive and user-friendly interface. Even though Rodin is a well-developed, stable and simple-to-use application, the large footprint of the Eclipse framework hinders its deployment inside of a web-service. Fortunately the ProB plug-in was also made available as a standalone tool, so that we could realize our envisioned client-server architecture for a seamless integration into the currently used test framework, as described in the previous sections. Another problem is due to the incompatibilities among plug-ins. For a realistic development, it is necessary to take advantage of the power of several plug-ins. This is however not supported by Rodin and its plug-ins. There is also no framework or methodology to ensure plug-in compatibilities. For instance, we need modularisation to decompose a software model into several sub-component, each having its public interface and private interface hidden from other components. Then, when we use ProB to check the model, ProB is unaware of the structure imposed by modularisation, and thus fails. References [D29] Xxxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxx Xxx, and Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx. DEPLOY Deliverable D29: Initial Assessment results. Technical report, FP7-DEPLOY Project, EU, 2010. published at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx-xxxxxxx.xx/. [D21] Xxxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxx Xxx, and Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx. DEPLOY Deliverable D4.1 D21: Report on Pilot Deployment in Business Information Sector. Technical report, FP7-DEPLOY Project, EU, 2010. published at http:// xxx.xxxxxx-xxxxxxx.xx/.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Assessment of Rodin

  • Assessment Center A promotional candidate may not appeal or dispute the Assessment Center or scoring of the Assessment Center to an administrative or judicial body except for fraud committed by an assessor.

  • ASSESSMENT REPORT Within 120 days following the general election held on November 2nd 2003, the returning officer of the munici- pality shall forward, in accordance with section 659.3 of the Act respecting elections and referendums in munici- palities (R.S.Q., c. E-2.2), an assessment report to the Chief Electoral Officer and the Minister setting out relevant ways to improve the trial and addressing, in particular, the following points : — the preparations for the election (choice of the new method of voting, communications plan, etc.) ; — the conduct of the advance poll and the poll ; — the cost of using the electronic voting system : – the cost of adapting election procedures ; – non-recurrent costs likely to be amortized ; – a comparison between the actual polling costs and the estimated polling costs using the new methods of voting and the projected cost of holding the general election on November 2nd 2003 using traditional methods ; — the number and duration of incidents during which voting was stopped, if any ; — the advantages and disadvantages of using the new method of voting ; — the results obtained during the addition of the votes and the correspondence between the number of ballot paper cards issued to the deputy returning officers and the number of ballot paper cards returned used and unused ; — the examination of rejected ballot papers, if it has been completed.

  • Lodgement of SWS wage assessment agreement C.6.1 All SWS wage assessment agreements under the conditions of this schedule, including the appropriate percentage of the relevant minimum wage to be paid to the employee, must be lodged by the employer with Fair Work Australia.

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of –

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Development of a transportation project must comply with applicable environmental laws. The party named in article 1, Responsible Parties, under AGREEMENT is responsible for the following:

  • Risk Assessments a. Risk Assessment - Transfer Agent shall, at least annually, perform risk assessments that are designed to identify material threats (both internal and external) against Fund Data, the likelihood of those threats occurring and the impact of those threats upon the Transfer Agent organization to evaluate and analyze the appropriate level of information security safeguards (“Risk Assessments”).

  • Assessment and updates 12.1 Various opportunities are provided to keep you up to date with your child’s progress. You will receive two comprehensive written reports each year and arrangements will be made for at least one interview where you can discuss your child’s development with their teacher. In addition, you can always contact the School to arrange a meeting if you have any concerns or wish to receive an update on progress.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013).

  • Statement of Grievance The grievance shall contain a statement of:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.