Back to basics. The indicators on the performance plan are aligned to the 5 pillars of back to basics Back to Basics. The following back to basic key performance indicator apply to your department: Good Governance Public Participation Institutional Capacity The indicators in the performance plan are aligned to the back to basics key performance areas.
Back to basics. Whether it is your golf swing, or a business situation, Paris says that “when things start falling apart, go back to the fundamentals. The natural instinct for someone who is in trouble in golf, and most other stressful situations, is to press harder. Although this instinct is natural, it is also very wrong.” The result, he says, is a “death spiral” on the course or in the boardroom. “When you feel yourself in the death spiral, it’s time to get back to basics—slow your game down, use more conservative clubs and tactics and have your developed mind take over from your primal instincts,” Paris adds. “Slow down and step back. Observe and assess the situation and then re-engage. In business, if you find that you are digging yourself into a hole, the first thing you need to do is stop digging.” Paris says writing the blog was an enlightening experience as he uncovered more and more parallels between golf and business. He also discovered that “all of my business experiences haven’t helped my golf game as much as golf has helped my business experiences.” All the more reason you should be playing more golf, right?
Back to basics. While modern Blockchains such as Ethereum [5], Bitcoin [1], Corda [54], have their roots in traditional state machine replication [22], the intricacies of each of their protocols lead them to pay no importance to their foundation. However, we believe that there are significant lessons from state machine replication that can and should be applied to these Blockchain systems. In fact, we believe that significant improve- ments in performance will only be achieved by re-examining the system architecture in the view of state machine replication, independently of the details of each of the protocols. These modern Blockchains monolithic system architectures, as well as early Byzantine fault-tolerant state machine replication systems [26, 55] intertwine consensus and application execution into a sin- gle interdependent blob. While multiple BFT xxxxxxxxxx [00, 55–59] demonstrated that BFT consensus protocols could process tens of thousands of requests per second, these systems were in fact only considering trivial (e.g., no-op) requests [53, 60, 61]. Fortunately, there is a ready-made architectural solution to these systems: separate agreement from execution [23, 53, 61]. Under a separated architecture, one cluster of nodes provides an ordering ser- vice [62] with a shared log [39, 42], while one or more additional clusters independently execute the commands stored in that log [42, 61, 63]. Furthermore, this principle has already been applied to real- world, industry-ready systems: as we previously surveyed, Facebook successfully uses this architectural strategy to improve both performance and maintenance characteristics of their primary log processing system [42]. Now is the time to apply the same principles to Blockchains. In the following sections, we will describe a novel architecture that applies these well-established principles, and demonstrate their viability in the current Blockchain panorama.
