Institutional Capacity. (i) Procurement procedures which provide for transparent practices, including in competition;
Institutional Capacity. 3 pages max. The applicant must present in narrative format a description of:
Institutional Capacity. The technical proposal must demonstrate the offeror’s institutional capacity to carry out projects in one or more of the following task areas: ● Design and implementation of evaluations (e.g., performance, whole-of-project, impact), studies, and/or research in relevant subject areas, such as: o Security and justice o Democracy and governance o Economic development o Anti-corruption and transparency o Education o Health o Agriculture and food security o Environment and infrastructure o Water and sanitation o Humanitarian Assistance o Resilience o Gender and youth ● Data Collection, including: o Large scale surveys o Quantitative data collection o Qualitative data collection (e.g., key informant interviews, focus group discussions) o Instrument design, ethical clearance, training of data collection staff, pre-testing, pilot testing, data collection, quality assurance, management of appropriate software, and data management o Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews (CATI), Computer Assisted Web Interviews (CAWI), and Xxx and Paper Personal Interviews (PAPI) o Data collection in complex, high crime, or other types of hard to reach, restrictive and non-permissive environments. ● Design and Implementation of TPM data collection processes in relevant technical sectors including: o Democracy, Human Rights and Governance (DRG) o Education o Health (including Nutrition) o Economic Growth and Agricultural Development (EGAD) o Infrastructure, Energy, and Engineering (OIEE) which includes Water and Sanitation o Humanitarian Assistance (OHA) o Resilience and New Partnership Engagement (RNPE) ● Other XXX related tasks and expertise Offers should demonstrate that they have sufficient institutional capacity, including in the areas of financial management, administration, project management and human resources, to carry out the tasks described in this RFP. This section of the proposal does not need to reference specific past performance or project or highlight individual key staff, as those will be included in sections 2.2.3 and 2.2.4.
Institutional Capacity. The District will implement the project with support from Yolo County. Although a small district, the District has institutional knowledge of grant management as it has received grant funding many times in the past including from CalFire and federal grants for fire protection gear. Pursuit and management of grant funds is a well-established part of the District’s administrative functions. Yolo County staff have significant experience with State and federal grants and can provide additional assistance to ensure successful management of the grant. The District will contract with a construction firm to complete the tasks and will oversee the construction themselves with additional assistance from Yolo County as needed.
Institutional Capacity. The MENTOR Initiative was established in 2002 and is a not-for-profit, charitable, designed to strengthen the capacity of Roll Back Malaria (RBM) country partnerships, MoH and national malaria control teams, international NGOs, UN and FBOs. Together with partners MENTOR implements more effective and coordinated action to reduce malaria-related morbidity and mortality. The MENTOR Initiative works in collaboration with the RBM secretariat in Geneva, UN, INGOs, and IFRC, as well as a network of academic and private partners. The MENTOR team includes international and national specialists for malaria, and vector borne and neglected tropical disease control in more challenging operational settings and contexts including humanitarian crises and post-conflict/recovery settings. The range of expertise provided by the MENTOR team includes epidemiology, emergency field assessment and planning, disease, surveillance, large scale indoor residual spraying, Larviciding, fly control and use of treated materials (LLINs, ITPS and DL) for disease prevention, diagnosis and investigation, case management, community mobilization and applied operational research and evaluation. This team has developed a strong, action-based, and clearly measurable strategy to build technical and operational capacity of partners in order to scale up effective disease control among vulnerable populations. The MENTOR Initiative has significant experience in the surveillance, prevention and case management of malaria, dengue fever, lymphatic filariasis and other neglected tropical diseases. Through the delivery of its ongoing 5-day international training courses on malaria control in humanitarian crises, and its new 5 day course on Vector borne disease control in humanitarian crisis, The MENTOR Initiative has trained well over 1100 international field team managers/senior team members from more than 100 INGOs, FBOs, UN agencies and MoH Teams (including MoH teams from Angola, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Central African Republic, Cameroon, Chad, Kenya, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Tanzania, Malawi, Egypt, UAE, South Africa, Thailand, Burma, Philippines, Afghanistan, Indonesia and Yemen). Capacity building has focused on how to design appropriate malaria and VBD control activities and improve existing health systems in order to provide best practice case management and control in settings with limited infrastructure. The MENTOR Initiative works with national MoH and National Malaria Control Programmes (NMC...
Institutional Capacity. Despite recent progress on policy and institutional reforms, institutional capacity in the road sector remains limited. This is reflected by (i) relatively weak enforcement of some existing regulations such as those relating to vehicle axle-load controls and road safety; (ii) lack of experience and knowledge about private-public partnership in road construction and maintenance; and (iii) limited staff experience in management of road projects. The World Bank has continuously supported necessary institutional strengthening, and further external assistance is needed to help RD in implementing the planned large- scale investment program.
Institutional Capacity. Criterion A.1 - Institutional, Administrative and Managerial Structures (ESG 1.1, ESG 1.2)
Institutional Capacity. Criterion A.1: The Institutional, Administrative, and Managerial structures Indicators:
Institutional Capacity. The vast capacity investment program requirements places extreme pressure on the capacity of almost all of NTDC’s departments, including planning, design, procurement, project management, and implementation. ADB has provided project preparatory and procurement support to assist with the project readiness, and a facility management consultant to assist with the implementation and preparation of future tranches. A capacity development plan will be prepared under Tranche 1, focused on capacity development required to meet the outputs and outcomes of the multitranche financing facility.
Institutional Capacity
