CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT COORDINATION WITH AIRLINE Sample Clauses

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT COORDINATION WITH AIRLINE. On or about July 1, or approximately ninety (90) days prior to the end of the then-current Fiscal Year, City shall notify Airline in writing of its proposed Capital Improvement program for the subsequent Fiscal Year, as contained in City’s proposed Capital Improvement budget for the Fiscal Year. City further reserves the right to notify Airline in writing at any other time of proposed Capital Improvements. The City agrees to provide Airline a written description of such Capital Improvements, such description to include the purpose, method of financing, and any reasonably anticipated effect on airline rents, fees, and charges hereunder and, to meet with Airline and other airlines within thirty (30) days after notification to Airline of said Capital Improvement to further discuss the proposed Capital Improvement. Such meeting may occur concurrently with the airline consultation described in Article 6. The City will give due consideration to the comments and recommendation of Airline with respect to the proposed Capital Improvements. Certain Capital Improvements are subject to deferral if Airline, together with other airlines, requests a deferral of a proposed Capital Improvement. If seventy-five percent (75%) in number of the airlines currently leasing premises from the City and operating at the Airport (excluding any Affiliates), and representing at least seventy-five percent (75%) of airline rents, fees, and charges associated with this Agreement paid during the previous Fiscal Year request deferral of a particular Capital Improvement not excluded below, it will be deferred for a period of twelve (12) months. Any such request for deferral must be in writing and submitted to City by Airline within thirty (30) days following the meeting as described above in accordance with Section 19.5. In the event of a Capital Improvement deferral, the Capital Improvement will be deferred for twelve (12) months following the deferral request. Following the twelve (12) months deferral period, the Capital Improvement may be constructed and the capital, operating, and maintenance costs and expenses will be included in airline’s rents, fees and charges upon the Capital Improvement’s completion.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT COORDINATION WITH AIRLINE

  • Engineer's Coordination with Owner Engineer shall be available for conferences with City so that Project can be designed with the full benefit of City's experience and knowledge of existing needs and facilities and be consistent with current policies and construction standards. City shall make available to Engineer all existing plans, maps, field notes, and other data in its possession relative to the Project. Engineer may show justification to City for changes in design from City standards due to the judgment of said Engineer of a cost savings to City and/or due to the surrounding topographic conditions. City shall make the final decision as to any changes after appropriate request by Engineer.

  • Capital Improvements The Department has identified the following possible opportunities for Capital Improvements:

  • Project Coordination The Engineer shall coordinate all subconsultant activity to include quality and consistency of deliverables and administration of the invoices and monthly progress reports. The Engineer shall coordinate with necessary local entities.

  • Utility Coordination Identify all potential utility conflicts and provide preliminary office check plans showing the problem locations, posted to the City’s FTP site. Plans will clearly identify specific utility company facilities by color and by name (i.e. not just “gas” or “fiber optic”). ENGINEER shall include a conflict list for each utility, also posted to the FTP site. ENGINEER shall meet with utility company representatives to review plans and utility verification forms (Attachment No. 3 to Exhibit “A”) at each milestone date and as directed by the CITY and as determined necessary by the ENGINEER. This in- formation will be compiled into a summary report (Attachment No. 4 to Exhibit “A” also available on the City’s FTP site) maintained and updated by ENGINEER as necessary to present a cohesive and reflective status of utilities, and provided to the City as necessary. ENGINEER shall maintain involvement with utility companies until all conflicts have been resolved (not just identified). When appropriate, the City Engineer will approve the identification on plans of conflicts to be resolved during construction. ENGINEER shall meet with involved utility company/ies and project contractor to resolve any conflicts with utilities that occur during construction.

  • Infrastructure Improvements The design, redevelopment and construction and completion of certain infrastructure improvements, including sewer, stormwater, electrical and water main improvements, along with other similar improvements.

  • Construction Activities Please list all major construction activities, both planned and completed, to be performed by Seller or the EPC Contractor. Activity EPC Contractor / Subcontractor Completion Date __/__/____ (expected / actual) __/__/____ (expected / actual)

  • Construction Phase Services 3.1.1 – Basic Construction Services

  • Asset Improvement 5. (a) The Bank shall not, directly or indirectly, extend or renew any credit to or for the benefit of any borrower, including any related interest of the borrower, who is obligated to the Bank in any manner on any extension of credit or portion thereof that has been charged off by the Bank or classified, in whole or in part, “loss” in the Report of Examination or in any subsequent report of examination, as long as such credit remains uncollected.

  • EDUCATIONAL IMPROVEMENT A leave of absence without pay of up to one (1) contract year may be granted to any employee, upon application, for the purpose of engaging in study at an accredited college or university reasonably related to professional responsibilities.

  • Donor Coordination Throughout the multi-year development of the Compact, MCC and the Government have engaged in an inclusive process that included consultations with the United States Government, Nepali communities and key private sector actors, non-government actors, and other donors as well as multilateral organizations. In particular, MCC worked closely with the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank in reviewing and agreeing on various power sector reforms required in Nepal for future programming by the two banks. MCC also consulted frequently with the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (“DFID”) during its preparation of a political economy analysis of power sector reform.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.