CDF Formation as a Delegation Problem Sample Clauses

CDF Formation as a Delegation Problem. In order to answer the question of why only some incumbents resort to CDFs, I start by considering a most straightforward possibility — namely, that CDFs can in principle hurt COIN just as much as they can facilitate it. If so, we may get to observe fewer instances of counterproductive CDFs if governments are able to anticipate their performance with some accuracy and choose not to form them in the first place. Medical treatment of a disease might provide a useful everyday analogy. If physicians are able to recognize patients in whom the treatment is contraindicated, its administration to those in whom it is not should produce consistently positive effects — assuming, of course, that the treatment is effective in the first place. In theory, it is not difficult to conceive of ways in which CDF effectiveness may be undermined. When CDF personnel have ample reason to xxxxx on assigned duties or defect to the insurgent side, we may reasonably suppose that CDF deployment in such cases may prove to be at best ineffective and at worst counterproductive. Historically, anecdotal evidence suggests that CDFs may have ample reason to want to xxxxx in their duties or consort with the enemy (e.g. see XxXxxx 1966, 228; Xxxxxx 1994, 97). Since CDFs tend to have only rudimentary training and may be poorly armed, personnel may xxxxx to avoid armed confrontation with rebels in which they have no chance of winning. Furthermore, since civilian compliance is an important determinant of political outcomes in civil wars, insurgents want to punish harshly anyone who cooperates with the state. As a result, thanks to their visibility, CDFs are often subjected to brutal insurgent reprisals in which entire families are executed in order to deter further collaboration with the incumbent. Because the state is likely to harshly punish overt non-compliance as well, CDFs may have strong incentives to covertly defect to the rebel side while maintaining the pretense of compliance with assigned duties. At the same time, incumbents may find it difficult to detect such defections in a timely manner due to CDFs’ geographical remoteness and relative autonomy from central authorities. Unsurprisingly, then, instances of CDF shirking, collaboration with insurgents, and outright defection are not hard to find. Thus, the U.S.-backed Self-Defense Corps in Vietnam often proved no match for the insurgent Viet Cong (VC) forces due to being lightly armed and poorly trained. In consequence, these units we...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to CDF Formation as a Delegation Problem

  • Notification of Force Majeure Event 11.5.1 The Affected Party shall give notice to the other Party of any event of Force Majeure as soon as reasonably practicable, but not later than seven (7) days after the date on which such Party knew or should reasonably have known of the commencement of the event of Force Majeure. If an event of Force Majeure results in a breakdown of communications rendering it unreasonable to give notice within the applicable time limit specified herein, then the Party claiming Force Majeure shall give such notice as soon as reasonably practicable after reinstatement of communications, but not later than one (1) day after such reinstatement. Provided that such notice shall be a pre-condition to the Affected Party’s entitlement to claim relief under this Agreement. Such notice shall include full particulars of the event of Force Majeure, its effects on the Party claiming relief and the remedial measures proposed. The Affected Party shall give the other Party regular (and not less than monthly) reports on the progress of those remedial measures and such other information as the other Party may reasonably request about the Force Majeure Event.

  • Service Jointly Provisioned with an Independent Company or Competitive Local Exchange Company Areas 4.5.1 BellSouth will in some instances provision resold services in accordance with the General Subscriber Services Tariff and Private Line Tariffs jointly with an Independent Company or other Competitive Local Exchange Carrier.

  • Leave of Absence for Employees Who Serve as Local Coordinators for the Ontario Nurses' Association An employee who serves as Local Coordinator for the Ontario Nurses' Association shall be granted leave of absence without pay up to a total of thirty-five (35) days annually. Leave of absence for Local Coordinators for the Ontario Nurses' Association will be separate from the Union leave provided in (a) above.

  • Contact in Event of Unauthorized Transfer If you believe your Card and/or access code has been lost or stolen or that someone has transferred or may transfer money from your account without your permission, either call us immediately at:

  • Definition of Force Majeure For the purposes of this section, an event of force majeure shall mean any cause beyond the control of the affected Interconnection Party or Construction Party, including but not restricted to, acts of God, flood, drought, earthquake, storm, fire, lightning, epidemic, war, riot, civil disturbance or disobedience, labor dispute, labor or material shortage, sabotage, acts of public enemy, explosions, orders, regulations or restrictions imposed by governmental, military, or lawfully established civilian authorities, which, in any of the foregoing cases, by exercise of due diligence such party could not reasonably have been expected to avoid, and which, by the exercise of due diligence, it has been unable to overcome. Force majeure does not include (i) a failure of performance that is due to an affected party’s own negligence or intentional wrongdoing; (ii) any removable or remediable causes (other than settlement of a strike or labor dispute) which an affected party fails to remove or remedy within a reasonable time; or (iii) economic hardship of an affected party.

  • Event of Force Majeure 15.1 Neither Party shall be in breach of the Agreement nor liable for any delay in performing, or failure to perform, any of its obligations under the Agreement if such delay or failure results from an Event of Force Majeure. In such circumstances the affected Party shall be entitled to a reasonable extension of the time for performing such obligations. If the period of delay or non-performance continues for three consecutive months, the Party not affected may terminate the Agreement immediately by giving written notice to the affected Party.

  • Reporting Unauthorized Transactions You should notify us immediately if you believe your Access Codes or any Access Devices have been lost or stolen, that someone has gained access to the Security Procedure, or that someone has transferred or may transfer money from your Account without your permission or if you suspect any fraudulent activity on your Account. To notify us, call us at the number provided in Section 9.6 between 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central Time during a Business Day.

  • Termination for Force Majeure In the event of a force majeure that lasts longer than thirty (30) days from the date that a Party claiming relief due to the force majeure event gives notice to the other Party, the Party not claiming relief under the force majeure event may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the other Party. For the avoidance of doubt, the COVID-19 pandemic does not constitute a force majeure event.

  • Duration of relief for force majeure The right of an Affected Party to relief under Clause 17.2 shall cease on the earlier of:

  • Notice of Force Majeure Event 14.2.1. As soon as practicable and in any case within 3 days of the date of occurrence of a Force Majeure Event or the date of knowledge thereof, the Party which is rendered wholly or partially unable to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement because of a Force Majeure Event (the “Affected Party”) shall notify the other party of the same, setting out, inter alia, the following in reasonable detail:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.