CEO Discussions. In the event that any Party asserts that there exists one or more disputes arising under or in connection with this Agreement (each a “Dispute”), such Party may deliver a written notice to the other Party involved therein specifying the nature of the asserted Dispute and requesting a meeting to attempt to resolve the same (“Notice of Dispute”). Both Parties agree that any Dispute shall be discussed by the CEOs of the Parties to seek to resolve the matter in good faith for a period of **** after the Notice of Dispute for that Dispute prior to either Party initiating arbitration in connection with such Dispute. Each Party hereby agrees not to initiate arbitration in connection with any Dispute prior to requesting such CEO discussions by written notice and subsequently engaging in such discussions in good faith (unless and except to the extent the notified Party’s refuses for its CEO to participate in such discussions).

CEO Discussions. Before initiating any litigation against each other, the Parties shall endeavor to amicably resolve any dispute arising out of this Agreement or any other dispute pertaining to the respective businesses of the Parties. Before initiating any litigation arising out of or related in any way to this Agreement, the Parties agree that the Chief Executive Officer of the party that proposes to initiate litigation (the “Initiating Party”) shall contact the Chief Executive Officer of the other party to attempt to resolve any dispute informally without resort to litigation, contemporaneously with or before giving any written notice of the existence of a dispute. The Chief Executive Officers may resolve the dispute themselves, or may designate other representatives to discuss and attempt in good faith to resolve the dispute. Each party shall work diligently to address the concerns raised by the other, and in any event shall attempt to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days of being notified in writing of the existence of a dispute, or such other length of time as the Parties may both agree upon in writing.

CEO Discussions. Before initiating any litigation against each other, the Parties shall endeavor to amicably resolve any dispute arising out of this Agreement or any other dispute pertaining to the respective businesses of the Parties. Before initiating any litigation, including without limitation litigation arising out of or related in any way to this Agreement, to the SYNERGETICS Patents or the ALCON Patents, to the SYNERGETICS Products or the ALCON Products, or otherwise arising out of the business activities of the Parties, the Parties agree that the Chief Executive Officer of the party that proposes to initiate litigation (the “Initiating Party”) shall contact the Chief Executive Officer of the other party to attempt to resolve any dispute informally without resort to litigation, contemporaneously with or before giving any written notice of the existence of a dispute. The Chief Executive Officers may resolve the dispute themselves, or may designate other representatives to discuss and attempt in good faith to resolve the dispute. Each party shall work diligently to address the concerns raised by the other, and in any event shall attempt to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days of being notified in writing of the existence of a dispute, or such other length of time as the Parties may both agree upon in writing.

CEO Discussions. Before initiating any litigation, the Parties shall endeavor to amicably resolve any dispute arising out of this Agreement or any other dispute pertaining to the respective businesses of the Parties. Before initiating any litigation arising out of or related in any way to this Agreement, to the AMO Patents or the Alcon Patents, to the AMO Products or the Alcon Products, or otherwise arising out of the business activities of the Parties, the Parties agree that the Chief Executive Officer of the party that proposes to initiate litigation (the “Initiating Party”) shall contact the Chief Executive Officer of the other party to attempt to resolve any dispute informally without resort to litigation, contemporaneously with or before giving any written notice of the existence of a dispute. The Chief Executive Officers may resolve the dispute themselves, or may designate other representatives to discuss and attempt in good faith to resolve the dispute. Each party shall work diligently to address the concerns raised by the other, and in any event shall attempt to resolve the dispute within twenty-one (21) days of being notified in writing of the existence of a dispute, or such other length of time as the Parties may both agree upon in writing.

Related to CEO Discussions

Informal Discussions The employee's concerns will be presented orally by the employee to the appropriate supervisor. Every effort shall be made by all concerned in an informal manner to develop an understanding of the facts and the issues in order to create a climate which will lead to resolution of the problem. If the employee is not satisfied with the informal discussion(s) relative to the matter in question, he/she may proceed to the formal grievance procedure.
Existing Discussions The Company agrees that it will immediately cease and cause to be terminated any existing activities, discussions or negotiations with any Persons conducted heretofore with respect to any Acquisition Proposal. The Company agrees that it will take the necessary steps to promptly inform the individuals or entities referred to in the first sentence hereof of the obligations undertaken in this Section 6.2. The Company also agrees that it will promptly request each Person that has heretofore executed a confidentiality agreement in connection with its consideration of acquiring it or any of its Subsidiaries to return or destroy all confidential information heretofore furnished to such Person by or on behalf of it or any of its Subsidiaries.
Mutual Discussions The Employer and the Union acknowledge the mutual benefits to be derived from dialogue between the parties and are prepared to discuss matters of common interest.
Informal Discussion If an employee has a problem relating to a work situation, the employee is encouraged to request a meeting with his or her immediate supervisor to discuss the problem in an effort to clarify the issue and to work cooperatively towards settlement.
Settlement Discussions This Agreement is part of a proposed settlement of matters that could otherwise be the subject of litigation among the Parties hereto. Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission of any kind. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and any applicable state rules of evidence, this Agreement and all negotiations relating thereto shall not be admissible into evidence in any proceeding other than to prove the existence of this Agreement or in a proceeding to enforce the terms of this Agreement.
Discussion Staff has reviewed the proposal relative to all relevant policies and advise that it is reasonably consistent with the intent of the MPS. Attachment B provides an evaluation of the proposed development agreement in relation to the relevant MPS policies.
No Existing Discussions As of the date hereof, the Company is not engaged, directly or indirectly, in any discussions or negotiations with any other party with respect to an Acquisition Proposal.
Publications and Presentations (a) Corvus may publish or present the final results of the Study (in accordance with this Section 8.2); provided that Corvus gives Genentech an opportunity to review and provide comments in accordance with subsection (b). (b) In the event that either Party (for purposes of this Section, the “Publishing Party”) wishes to publish or present any Study Data or Sample Data, the Publishing Party shall submit to the other Party (for purposes of this Section, the “Reviewing Party”) all materials related to the proposed publication or presentation (including posters, abstracts, manuscripts and written descriptions of oral presentations) at least [***] days (or [***], in the case of abstracts) prior to the date of submission for publication or the date of presentation, whichever is earlier, of any of such submitted materials. The Reviewing Party shall review such submitted materials and respond to the Publishing Party as soon as reasonably possible, but in any case within [***] (or [***], in the case of abstracts) of receipt thereof. The Publishing Party will be permitted to publish or present such Study Data or Sample Data, but shall give reasonable consideration to any request by the Reviewing Party; provided, however, at the request of the Reviewing Party, the Publishing Party shall (i) delete from such proposed publication or presentation Confidential Information of the Reviewing Party (including Sample Data), provided that the Publishing Party shall have no obligation to delete any Study Data; and/or (ii) if such proposed publication or presentation contains patentable subject matter owned solely or jointly by the Reviewing Party, delay such proposed publication or presentation, for [***], to permit the Reviewing Party to prepare and file a patent application. The Publishing Party shall comply with all applicable requirements regarding disclosure of industry support (financial or otherwise) in connection with any publications and presentations. For clarity, the provisions of this Section 8.2 only apply to publications or presentations of Study Data or Sample Data and do not apply to any other publications or presentations by a Party, including with respect to results from such Party’s development activities outside of the Study. (c) Authorship of publications or presentations of final results of the Study and/or any Study Data or Sample Data shall be determined in accordance with appropriate scientific and academic standards and customs.
Revisions of Prospectus -- Material Changes If at any time prior to the Settlement Date any event shall occur or condition exist as a result of which it is necessary, in the opinion of counsel for the Agents, counsel for the Company or counsel for the Trust, to amend or supplement the Registration Statement in order that the Registration Statement will not contain an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading or to amend or supplement the Prospectus in order that the Prospectus will not include an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein not misleading in light of the circumstances existing at the time the Prospectus is delivered to a purchaser, or if it shall be necessary, in the opinion of any such counsel, to amend or supplement the Registration Statement or amend or supplement the Prospectus in order to comply with the requirements of the 1933 Act or the 1933 Act Regulations, as applicable, the Company shall give prompt notice, confirmed in writing, to the Agents to cease the solicitation of offers for the purchase of Notes and to cease sales of any Notes by the Purchasing Agent, and the Company will promptly prepare and file with the Commission subject to Section III(b)(ii) hereof, such amendment or supplement as may be necessary to correct such statement or omission or to make the Registration Statement and Prospectus comply with such requirements, and the Company will furnish to the Agents, without charge, such number of copies of such amendment or supplement as the Agents may reasonably request. In addition, the Company will comply with the 1933 Act, the 1933 Act Regulations, the 1934 Act and the rules and regulations of the Commission under the 1934 Act (the "1934 Act Regulations") so as to permit the completion of the distribution of each offering of Notes.
Results and Discussion Table 1 (top) shows the root mean square error (RMSE) between the three tests for different numbers of topics. These results show that all three tests largely agree with each other but as the sample size (number of topics) decreases, the agreement decreases. In line with the results found for 50 topics, the randomization and bootstrap tests agree more with the t-test than with each other. We looked at pairwise scatterplots of the three tests at the different topic sizes. While there is some disagreement among the tests at large p-values, i.e. those greater than 0.5, none of the tests would predict such a run pair to have a significant difference. More interesting to us is the behavior of the tests for run pairs with lower p-values. Table 1 (bottom) shows the RMSE among the three tests for run pairs that all three tests agreed had a p-value greater than 0.0001 and less than 0.5. In contrast to all pairs with p-values 0.0001 (Table 1 top), these run pairs are of more importance to the IR researcher since they are the runs that require a statistical test to judge the significance of the per- formance difference. For these run pairs, the randomization and t tests are much more in agreement with each other than the bootstrap is with either of the other two tests. Looking at scatterplots, we found that the bootstrap tracks the t-test very well but shows a systematic bias to produce p-values smaller than the t-test. As the number of topics de- creases, this bias becomes more pronounced. Figure 1 shows a pairwise scatterplot of the three tests when the number of topics is 10. The randomization test also tends to produce smaller p-values than the t-test for run pairs where the t- test estimated a p-value smaller than 0.1, but at the same time, produces some p-values greater than the t-test’s. As Figure 1 shows, the bootstrap consistently gives smaller p- values than the t-test for these smaller p-values. While the bootstrap and the randomization test disagree with each other more than with the t-test, Figure 1 shows that for a low number of topics, the randomization test shows less noise in its agreement with the bootstrap com- pared to the t-test for small p-values.

CEO Discussions Sample Clauses

Filter & Search

Related Clauses

Parent Clauses

Related to CEO Discussions