Chronology. 1. Evaluation tables are listed for Plans 1, 2.2, 2.2 Peer, 2.4, and 2.4 Peer describing the procedures for both formal evaluation years, in which summary evaluations are required, and informal years, in which no written summary evaluation is required.
Chronology. It is expected that the recovered artifact assemblage at the prehistoric site(s) will suggest the presence of at least one cultural component (such as the Mississippian or Late Woodland). Insights into more precise time spans at both sites can be gained through analysis of point and ceramic styles, as well as the acquisition of charcoal samples for radiocarbon analysis.
Chronology. This plan is available to any permanent staff member who has been in the District for ten or more years and who meets the Standards. It has a four-year cycle with a two-year reflective review and professional dialogue.
Chronology. This plan is available to any permanent staff member who has been in the District for ten or more years and who meets the Standards. It has a four-year cycle with a two-year reflective review and professional dialogue. Plan 2.4 Target Dates Staff Member Supervisor Informal Year (1) 10/15 Meet to write, discuss, and plan implementation of professional development plan 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year Reflective Year (2) 10/15 Meet to write, discuss, and plan implementation of professional development plan 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 4/30 Discuss and assess progress on professional development plan 5/1 Complete Reflective Review Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year Receive completed Reflective Review and send to HR Informal Year (3) 10/15 Meet to write, discuss, and plan implementation of professional development plan 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year Formal Year (4) 10/15 Meet to write, discuss, and plan implementation of professional development plan 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 4/30 Discuss and assess progress on professional development plan 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year Complete “Summary Form for Evaluation of Performance” Plan 2.4 Peer — Chronology This plan is available to any permanent staff member who has been in the District for ten or more years and who meets the Standards. It has a four-year cycle with a two-year reflective review and professional dialogue. Plan 2.4 Peer Target Dates Staff Member Peer(s) Supervisor Informal Year (1) 9/30 Identify professional partnership group 10/15 Meet to write, discuss, and plan implementation of professional development plan 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year Reflective Year (2) 9/30 If needed, modify professional partnership group 10/15 Meet to write, discuss, and plan implementation of professional development plan 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 4/30 Discuss and assess progress on professional development plan 5/1 Comp...
Chronology. This plan is available to any permanent staff member who has been in the District for ten or more years and who meets the Standards. It has a four-year cycle with a two-year reflective review and professional dialogue. Plan 2.4 Target Dates Staff Member Supervisor Informal Year (1) 10/15 Meet to write, discuss, and plan implementation of professional development plan 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year Reflective Year (2) 10/15 Meet to write, discuss, and plan implementation of professional development plan 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 4/30 Discuss and assess progress on professional development plan 5/1 Complete Reflective Review Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year Receive completed Reflective Review and send to HR Informal Year (3) 10/15 Meet to write, discuss, and plan implementation of professional development plan 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year Formal Year (4) 10/15 Meet to write, discuss, and plan implementation of professional development plan 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 4/30 Discuss and assess progress on professional development plan 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year Complete “Summary Form for Evaluation of Performance” Plan 2.4 Peer — Chronology This plan is available to any permanent staff member who has been in the District for ten or more years and who meets the Standards. It has a four-year cycle with a two-year reflective review and professional dialogue.
Chronology. If more than one policy is eligible for recapture, any recapture must be affected beginning with the policy with the earliest issue date and continuing in chronological order according to the remaining policies' issue dates.
Chronology. 1) December 2, 1995 – Submission of CLTC Application; Application No. 8
Chronology. A. December 2, 1995: Ms. Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxx’x agricultural application was received 8:09
Chronology. December 8, 2012 - Board of Directors approved 2012 WGQ Annual Plan whose scope included a master agreement survey and development under Items 7a. and 7b. • February 8, 2012 – WGQ Contracts Subcommittee (SC) completed the survey under Item 7a. that resulted in SC voting to proceed with development of a master agreement. • March 7, 2012 to September 13, 2012 – SC held 12 meetings with 60 representatives from 30 separate entities participating. Participation averaged 20 attendees at each meeting. • September 13, 2012 – SC unanimously voted a recommendation to the WGQ Executive Committee (EC) to adopt the Master Agreement as a Standard. • September 21, 2012 to October 22, 2012 – Industry comment period on Master Agreement where comments were submitted from 5 companies. • October 19, 2012 – SC meeting to review industry comments and prepare responses for EC meeting discussion and review. • October 25, 2012 – EC meeting where Master Agreement was discussed and adopted as a NAESB WGQ Standard. • November 7, 2012 – Master Agreement issued for NAESB Membership ratification. • December 6, 2012 – end of NAESB Membership ratification period. • Assuming ratification by NAESB Membership, Master Agreement will be posted as a NAESB WGQ Standard.
Chronology. [3] In order to fully understand the issues which are before the Court, it is helpful to chronicle some important events commencing with the death of Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xx. (“the deceased”) on 28
