Chronology. 1. Evaluation tables are listed for Plans 1, 2.2, 2.2 Peer, 2.4, and 2.4 Peer describing the procedures for both formal evaluation years, in which summary evaluations are required, and informal years, in which no written summary evaluation is required.
2. All temporary and probationary staff members will follow the chronology given for Plan 1, which involves formal evaluation every year.
3. All permanent staff members with fewer than ten years experience in the District unless requesting Plan 2.2 Peer (two-year cycle), shall follow Plan 2.2, having a formal evaluation (written summary evaluation) every other year except when:
a. The staff member has been placed under Evaluation Plan 3: Does Not Meet Standards — Support/Improvement Plan Implemented;
b. The staff member has been placed under Evaluation Plan 4: Does Not Meet Standards — Administrative Review.
4. All permanent staff members with ten years or more experience in the District, unless requesting Plan 2.4 Peer (four-year cycle), shall follow Plan 2.4, having a formal evaluation (written summary evaluation) every four years and a professional dialogue with reflective review with the supervisor/evaluator in the second year of the cycle, except when circumstances exist as detailed in G.3.a. and 3.b. listed above.
5. The target dates listed in the tables do not necessarily preclude those activities from also occurring during other times of the year.
6. This Chronology by itself does not give a complete picture of the evaluation process. It must be looked at in conjunction with the responsibilities listed on the previous pages. Further, the establishment of the following target dates is not meant to ignore the importance of ongoing informal meetings between the supervisor and the staff member. Such meetings are an important part of the evaluation process.
7. The target dates listed in these tables are dates by when the procedures are expected to be accomplished, although exceptions may be made. If procedures are not accomplished within two weeks after the target dates listed, some final judgments about the staff member’s performance that year may be impossible or inappropriate.
8. During the informal evaluation year, staff members will be expected to review and revise their professional development plans, and may use a variety of methods for assessing progress on their professional development plans, including self-evaluation. Informal meetings with supervisors are encouraged.
Plan 1 — Chronology Plan 1...
Chronology. It is expected that the recovered artifact assemblage at the prehistoric site(s) will suggest the presence of at least one cultural component (such as the Mississippian or Late Woodland). Insights into more precise time spans at both sites can be gained through analysis of point and ceramic styles, as well as the acquisition of charcoal samples for radiocarbon analysis.
Chronology. This plan is available to any permanent staff member who has been in the District for ten or more years and who meets the Standards. It has a four-year cycle with a two-year reflective review and professional dialogue.
Chronology. This plan is available to any permanent staff member who has been in the District for ten or more years and who meets the Standards. It has a four-year cycle with a two-year reflective review and professional dialogue. 10/15 Meet to write, discuss, and plan implementation of professional development plan 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year 10/15 Meet to write, discuss, and plan implementation of professional development plan 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 4/30 Discuss and assess progress on professional development plan 5/1 Complete Reflective Review Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year Receive completed Reflective Review and send to HR 10/15 Meet to write, discuss, and plan implementation of professional development plan 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year 10/15 Meet to write, discuss, and plan implementation of professional development plan 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 4/30 Discuss and assess progress on professional development plan 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year Complete “Summary Form for Evaluation of Performance” This plan is available to any permanent staff member who has been in the District for ten or more years and who meets the Standards. It has a four-year cycle with a two-year reflective review and professional dialogue.
Chronology. This plan is available to any permanent staff member who has been in the District for ten or more years and who meets the Standards. It has a four-year cycle with a two-year reflective review and professional dialogue. 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 5/1 Complete Reflective Review Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year Receive completed Reflective Review and send to HR 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year Complete “Summary Form for Evaluation of Performance” This plan is available to any permanent staff member who has been in the District for ten or more years and who meets the Standards. It has a four-year cycle with a two-year reflective review and professional dialogue. 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year 9/30 If needed, modify professional partnership group 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 5/1 Complete Reflective Review Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year Receive completed Reflective Review and send to HR 9/30 If needed, modify professional partnership group 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year 9/30 If needed, modify professional partnership group 2/14 Provide opportunity for staff assessment of administrative performance 5/1 Plan tentative revisions in professional development plan for following year Complete “Summary Form for Evaluation of Performance”
Chronology. If more than one policy is eligible for recapture, any recapture must be affected beginning with the policy with the earliest issue date and continuing in chronological order according to the remaining policies' issue dates.
Chronology. 1) December 2, 1995 – Submission of CLTC Application; Application No. 8
2) December 12, 1996 – CLTC Interview Report indicates that Xx. Xxxxxxxxxxx requested Lot 1, Block 3, Agat; Comments and Location Sketch portion indicates “Exchanging lots with Xxxxxx
Chronology. 3 Contractor's position (reason for AOC's potential liability) .4 Supporting documentation of merit or entitlement .5 Supporting documentation of damages .6 Begin each issue on a new page
Chronology. 9 On 1 May 2003 a request was received on form 21/77 to register under section 33 a licence in favour of LPP. Section 33 deals with the registration of rights in or under patents and patent applications. The form was dated 29 April 2003 and signed by Xx Xxxxxxx and also by Xx Xxxxxx acting as Xx Xxxxxxx’x agent. It was duly recorded on the register on 28 May 2003. 10 On 12 October 2004, Xx Xxxxxxx contacted the Office claiming that the form 21/77 had been altered after he had signed it, to extend the period of the licence from one to five years. After further correspondence with the Office, on 15 October 2004 Xx Xxxxxxx filed a request on form 51/77 seeking to replace Xx Xxxxxx as address for service by himself. This change was recorded on the Register on 18 October 2004.
Chronology. A. December 2, 1995: Ms. Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxx’x agricultural application was received 8:09
a. m. at the Piti intake site and issued numerical designation 2
B. December 29, 1995: Xx. Xxxx Xxxxxxxx’s non-refundable application fee of $50.00 was paid with receipt no. A4836540
C. March 17, 1997: Agricultural Interview naming her children, Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx and Xxxxx X. Xxxxx and sister, Xxxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx as her successors
D. June 25, 1997: Changing the request of acreage from two acres to one and half acres.
E. April 25, 2002: Inspection report stating very little farming activity on half acre noting Xx. Xxxx Xxxxxxxx left the island after Typhoon Paka (about 5 years prior)
